MJ kihara

There is a lot pliz ...it's a unit of time that we agree upon...it's one of the base units... that's enough to make it special. Your still paraphrasing may statements...what was the purpose of me using @ symbol?

Can you give examples of such sites?...you seem to have visited them...the issue is not being against mainstream science....it about someone like Modred with a willing to engage from various angles...therefore,ending up giving proper guidance of where mainstream guardrails are. Am not underrating other members but there seems to be a culture going around of encouraging verbose...giving lots of inconsistent terms, when someone start digging deeper to their verbose they use words to put dirt in someone's thread by using words like bollocks,colours of love,bullshits,shits..e.t.c..e.t.cc...while giving each other green positive marks,however,the point of discussion they give it negative red marks, are this words terms in physics? Someone can't declare to be a senior member who dirt other people's thread...while year in year out can't open even a single thread to have other people chart/discuss...but feel entitled to dirt others thread and given a free hand on green/red reputation marks... that's hyperbolic.

For them putting negative marks everywhere is easier than cracking their mental barrier; a barrier to being creative and inventive. A good example is someone around who is vocal and thread blocker initiator that makes declarations that a second belong to Babylonians and it's of no need to modern physics and that a second is not relevant to theoretical physics, on top of that,to make things worse he is given a green mark for such nonsense... What is the purpose of a second in reduced Planck's constant ?... Such a so called ''respected member"...is arguing even against the seven fundamental units(base units) and he receives claps...what kind/level of hypocrisy is that?...speed of light being a constant makes the units of space and time interconvertible.... nothing wrong with normalizing units...if something has a constant energy every second no matter what you do to it ..you wait for ten years the same energy wait for a billion years the them energy..it's common sense to know that particular energy is intrinsic to that particular particle, therefore, for that particle' action including units of second as j.s or just writing energy units alone i.e j. Is one and the same thing...such common sense it's not common to someone without intuitive understanding of physics concepts.

The more a I go through my thread and posts after Modred has not been around the more I appreciate how resourceful he was...I feel it's meaningless for a scientific forum to lack such kind of a person...some folks who appear conspicuous around just verbose...a lot of everything nonsensical,bullshit and bollocks...am feeling no progress can be made in such an environment.... Can someone tell me if Modred will be back in this forum?

Fro Wikipedia; When relativistic effects are significant, the action of a point particle of mass m travelling a world line C parametrized by the proper time τ is The one second I was previously referring to in the thread is the proper time.

Hahahaha...🤩🤗🥰....atleast atleast the forum has improved a little bit, you can see who is on your thread ...the negative marks....someone around holding ''personal vendetta" has been following me putting mad and cow dung in my threads inform of red negative marks...to that person DON'T BE JEALOUS! Open A thread and see I won't put such a shit there...such behavior is being uncivilized.

Do use your luck of understanding to clarify the OP...I had realized earlier; Your ranting doesn't make you correct. This is tantamount to soapboxing...your are becoming a preacher...you are pretending to defend science and yet you don't know the importance of standardization of units...are you not aware of Caesium atomic clock? Don't use your lack of understanding to clarify the OP...I had realized earlier; I fail to understand the relevance of your questions to OP...esp since you are leaving important fundamental questions unanswered...stop asking questions that leads tap-dancing. The first part of question;Michelson-Morley type experiment if it's able to detect such a particle..the answer is overwhelming No...as I had stated earlier.. Though you have brought up this issue; The kind of energy am talking about is very very little unimaginably little..10^-64 j....if you start to think about renormalization and the Planck's constant things start to make sense.. otherwise this argument is out of OP, therefore,I won't extend further than that. Regarding; The second part of the OP question involving units of action is the one being discussed, I don't think it has been sufficiently addressed in regard to the first part.... Is it possible to calculate the action of a single free falling particle,given it's energy is known?

I did I say that?...it becomes an energy when your dealing with one second.... substitute one second then tell us what you get? Being ambiguous is not an answer...why are you referring to others..the question was specifically directed to you...'others' is not an answer. given a particle of energy What's it's mass?....what childish game is there? What other information do you require to convert that to mass?.....I told you to use speed of light. You are talking of elementary physics...I'm realizing you have a serious problem with internalizing physics concepts...may I ask you, your qualification on physics? not in bad faith. Is there any other way apart from...E=mc^2..you have energy and speed of light is a constant? What else do you require?

I get you...I have been ambushed am considering your question. Can you precisely clarify what you mean by this? I see you take what I have been doing with seriousness...from that energy calculate the mass of that particle and you will see...it's almost massless therefore,just use the speed of light...let me give you a clue, follow the other posts then beat the bush around yang-mill theory mass gap problem then see which rabbit comes out....I think 🤔 that million dollar I should get....I don't think the majority of people around get it.

You like bullshitting..not everyone like bullshitting neither do I...you need to update your understanding... don't paraphrase my statements then ask me nonsensical questions...can you have your own bullshitting post we see how it appears? Action implies a constant energy which is a difference between kinetic energy and potential energy for a given duration.. what about if potential energy is zero?...it's energy will be in kinetic energy. It seems you are hallucinating your own definition of action that we/am not aware of...your verbose is full of confusion. If you can't see them what are they?....mmmm... This are your numbers. I talked about ; Meaning it's times 10^-41 the CMB photon energy your talking about.

It's for each particular particle in the 'stream'....note the quotes. Definition of action from Wikipedia.."..equivalently, action is the difference between the particle's kinetic energy and its potential energy, times the duration for which it has that amount of energy." If the particle consistently have that particular energy(it's K.E-P.E) as it free fall for a particular time...that is it's action...mmm... Look at this replies... The initial answer should be just simple Yes/No followed by explanation.which one is which Yes or No?

Okay then. Can you answer this question Upto that point?

Can we answer this question...we be in agreement before the fight begins about the other issues...exchemist and others. Are you okay? Or you need a psychiatrist?

Can you answer the question in OP, otherwise I will feel entitled to ignore you nonsense littered queries....also again your "PS"...don't divert attention around by your obsession with language.

👍 I have never forced you to follow my threads...fear mongering filled cocoon won't be allowed to hold everyone hostage. .''..never..''. according to your understanding ... Atleast you should have answered a simple Yes/No to the OP before unleashing your vitriol.

I don't know how you are looking at it. Hz^-1 equate to a second...then it will be 1×10−64 J⋅s. I can see your agreeing with my take regarding to OP

We should stick to the thread appropriately to avoid highjacking.

There more correspondence and symmetry to be discovered it's not like we are at end of the world..once we accept to come out of fear mongering echoes filled cocoon, problems like yang-mills mass gap issues can be easily deciphered ....they is nothing wrong with intuition as long as you are not doing magic,provided intuition is followed by scientific explanations...once person intuition can be different to another person intuition..if person is able to use his intuition well and good.

Well understood. Neither did I mean that. Correspondence and symmetry arguments work best when the urge of cherry picking is contained. Back to the first axiom of equivalency.

My question is simple can michelson-morley type experiment be able to detect a particle with an energy of 1×10−64 J or a stream of such particles @ 1×10−64 J⋅Hz−1 Discuss....My intake is NO.

That's not the point of discussion; you don't get it.

In what context? That sentence was part of a statement. or rather, a reply to request for further clarification/explanations following a conversation.

When the map breaks down at some points cause the territory happened to be wrapped in a manner the map can't handle or the territory behaves in a manner the map can't explain...what we end up with is the best map of the territory,not the territory.

🙏 ...even me I wonder the purpose of all these...it always take me back to mainstream concept,however,for me, with high form of controversial interpretation like for instance all have been doing is interpreting eiπ +1=0 in unconventional way....the weird thing I never started there but I ended up there. The latest part,is when I talked about 'metric emerging ' it was becoming clearer to me,I may also be dealing with Holography...talking about confusion....this makes me EVEN MORE CONFUSED....it's knocking on the gates of believe...what to be believe or not...you can imagine projection giving rise to physical distance...I need a break... Holography is a mainstream science.

😂 AI agent.