MJ kihara

What are sterile neutrino?...i.e their properties briefly,of course not using mathematical symbols just explanation ,so that I see how I can deal with them using this concept.

The issue is that anything new, stones are thrown to it....can you speculate about old already proven fact...there seems to be a taste of how things should be.

This is math.... simple math. Talking of consciousness is off topic,outside this thread remember it was quantum gravity ''simplified"...I talked of gravity, through gravitational waves from massive graviton decaying to massless spin 2 spacetime particles(virtual particles)...I said since it's massive and cause of E=mc^2, energy conservation the energy released becomes gravitational potential energy carried by gravitational waves...I showed through a diagram how components of Einstein fields equation relate to those diagrams giving an overview of spacetime curvature...my mission of simplifying I have already talked about it....the intention was not to complicate the already complicated issues of gravity. The discussions here is just one component of my overall agenda, where consciousness comes into place, meaning it belong to another thread..... Anyway you can't keep doing the same thing in exactly the same manner and expect different results otherwise I could have opened a thread to start doing exactly what has already been done.

I think this is what i have partially been explaining in this thread; If particles are excitation of fields...what do you get when spacetime field is excited?

The concept reproduces already developed math e.g f=ma,E=mc^2 ,EFE as shown in on the initial diagram e.t.c e.t.c we can't be in the business of repeating ourselves when we want to progress from the point we are already in....I think the predictions that matters is being able to explain new discoveries and deciphering the unknowns.....

I referred spacetime particles ( virtual particles) to be the least possible formation, something with it's periphery being just time and space...in the concept without it,there is no concept. To conform to the above explanations, spacetime particles ( virtual particles) in this case will be analogously to consciousness 'field' excitation. This concept go beyond the limit by stating that,speculating that, assuming that beyond those limits consciousness exist that initiate formation of virtual particles aka spacetime particles that becomes the basic unit of universe framework (spacetime fabric). In this concept movement of space time particles renormalise first via formation of dark matter,then dark photons,photons, neutrinos,up the hierarchy up to graviton in case of ablackhole up to event horizon then finally to the periphery of the universe which in our case(human)seems to be infinitely away.

In another thread I had to clear the issue by settling to use basic framework of the universe as synonymous to spacetime fabric...am not referring to rubber sheet analogy with that in mind it's difficult to get the concept am trying to layout. The difference comes when spacetime particle (virtual particle) disintergrate...they move in time or in space that is i.e instantaneously. I have to work on the mathematics...I think all this has something to do with 1,0 &-1.

Am not refuting that but rather than being 'just a geometry' it's something dynamic that is evolving...the issue is us separating ourselves from 'spacetime fabric'..we are just part of it... therefore,by assigning a set of coordinate we are extracting information out of it.

I prefer referring spacetime particles as virtual particles as they are fundamental to the structure of 'spacetime fabric' and so 'tiny' they are emitted by everything.. including the instruments used in M&M experiments, therefore,such arrangements is difficult to detect them. The analogy 'brooklyn is not expanding' in this case doesn't apply since every thing is expanding and contributing to expansion of the universe. Being in a galaxy which has of course a Blackhole leads to this expansion not being profound....since as stated earlier in the diagram pressure increase towards source of mass due to increase in virtual particles(spacetime particles) concentration leading to increase in their entanglement. Also stable and partially stable virtual particles(spacetime particles) move at speed of light, therefore, the issue of aether is not applicable here.

With due respect,what am dealing with should give us the source of time,space, information in essence everything we see around....it should tell us what time is. Spacetime particles with spin 2....it has four degrees of freedom that is energy density, energy flux, momentum density and momentum flux therefore, =4/2= 2 to get 2. As the spacetime particles will be moving from source of mass as gravitational waves to become part of spacetime fabric it will be undergoing change of basis among it's four degrees of freedom whereby at the peek of the amplitude it's either energy density or momentum density dorminating on the wave as shown on diagram. cummulatively eventually leads to effective measurable action...forming fields and particles. I think we can consider coordinate as information of what we are looking for.

Let consider this... space-time diagram--time axis meet space axis(x,y,z) at the origin 0....at this point,the most local point..there will be nothing(the ultimate Einstein vacuum) from there time axis and space axis emerge....forming spacetime particle(virtual particle), that probably stabilises when time and space reaches unity. Therefore, spacetime particle(virtual particle) represent the most basic geometry of spacetime t,x,y,z.... probably a unit of spacetime(Einstein vacuum with a periphery--the vacuum need to be bound for it to exist). When time and space reaches unity the resultant spacetime particle( virtual particle) is stable,when time is dilated or space dilated or with varying degrees of dilation of either component the resultant spacetime particle is partially stable while when time and space disintergrate the resultant spacetime particle(virtual particle) is unstable.

Tiny to the extent,if I state here at this point,you will say am going nuts...and get locked, initially as I was formulating this concept,it seemed mad but that's it worked like that.

In this concept graviton forms as a standing waves on elementary particles,therefore,from the hierarchy of particles as shown on down quark diagram,it will be on higgs field, boson zone,the last bit from higgs boson,therefore it's expected to be massive. It decays at to less than planck's time as it's formed(graviton)to gravitational waves which in turn consist of entangled massless spin-2 spacetime particles (Virtual particles). Being massive and given E=mc^2,for energy conservation laws to hold,the energy released becomes the gravitational potential energy carried by gravitational waves.

Shifting goal posts... semantics. From the down quark diagram...if you have keenly looked at it there is what am referring to photons zoo zone....of course ultralight particles belong there.... They are talking about ultralight particles..."particles" ....Abstract: M08.00001 : Black Holes are Watching You* 10:45 AM–10:57 AM... ...the mere presence of the black hole will eventually destroy the coherence of the superposition..... I talked about CONSCIOUSNESS IN BLACKHOLE SINGULARITY. ....all said and done...you preference is fields and excitation....I prefer fields, excitation and particles... Not in bad faith...i sincerely hope the AI will reach to the point of reading all articles at arxiv.org and give us accurate, precise and prompt summary when requested and be able to be given ideas/ imaginations and turn them into papers that can be admitted at arxiv.org. It can be imagination, designs, diagrams then followed by mathematics......or mathematics followed by imagination, designs then followed by diagrams...it depends on someone preferences....on this point,you can't force someone into a certain preferences and overviews. I feel the thread should stop there...others issues should be opened in another thread.

Surely...APS(American physical society) press release... session paper...pop media? ....study of crinkles in spacetime....under supervision of a Nobel laureate....hhhh am short of words. This are things released as earlier as April this year just a month ago...the reason am quoting them, the diagrams that am using in this thread have been having them for more than three years and when I read those"pop" articles I was like this is what....anyway purpose of news,media, internet to give us the most updated happening... no further words.

....mumbo jumbo...you came late in the thread i wonder if you have gone through the discussions...I wonder if you have read the links that i have sent...what your doing is not mainstream....you look alot at the semantics rather than ideas especially when it's beyond your imagination....do you have idea what assumptions are in any case....virtual particles being too small to be subjected under principle of uncertainty.... Let's do this simple experiment to settle this....(I won't let you trash this thread)... Can you pliz make up your own statements here so that we see how they morph into those diagrams I have posted?.....or otherwise can you come up with a simple diagram to illustrate what a quark is to an uneducated layman... without plagiarising others ideas? What you are doing is defending status quo of knowledge gatekeeping. you can't see back up when already you have a notion. Anyway ✋🤗😊 am done. Clarification the above post is for...

.....mmmmm.....😴... It's clear the weight on my shoulders on this issues it's too heavy...trying to dare the undarable...since I know the next step is to be locked... Concerning this thread let wait for the evidence to stream in the near/far future...Am waiting for the Improvements on the AI programs to be able to feed it my ideas, imaginations and diagrams and Chun out formulars and mathematics ....at the rate at which things are happening going with the recent news articles concerning AI achievements it may end up to be earlier than expected....I wonder if they will come a day when professional papers will be published by the same AI to the point sites like this forum will invite humans to just speculate anything.. which may be wrong,correct,silly,word salads e.t.c, e.t.c anything... This links containing recent research maybe useful to change the perception; 1-"Astrophysicists reveal the nature of dark matter through the study of crinkles in spacetime." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 25 April 2023. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/04/230425111243.htm>. 2-https://www.google.com/url?q=https://meetings.aps.org/Meeting/APR23/Session/M08.1&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwi9kdf_lo7_AhXH-qQKHWxfCuwQFnoECAsQAg&usg=AOvVaw1erDW-TP6-bHzj-aq4NQJc 3-https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/22/world/webb-telescope-massive-early-galaxies-scn/index.html&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwiqhNyFmI7_AhVN3qQKHRu_As0QFnoECAUQAg&usg=AOvVaw1icyN0c0-4PpokoorY6dOI These are research done by respectable organisations that point to the fact we need to rethink...those diagrams helps me understand these observations....they are a design that should be followed by math....first part is design...and of course by reasoning and imagination....instead of putting lots of salads here, let us see your designs and imaginations without repetitions and plagiarism...before you dismiss other people ideas.

Are there mathematics in quantum mechanics,QFT or cosmology describing the blackhole singularity? The virtual particles am referring to are spacetime particles....I chose virtual because they are Soo tiny that being virtual is the correct to discribe them. The conventional virtual particles and virtual photons,I explain their source and properties according to electrodynamics as derived from this concept,which I haven't yet talked about them here. The concept of invariance of light speed is critical and standard in physics....in this concept there issues concerning that,based on the nature of spacetime particles...this may explain why alot of people have difficulties comprehending those diagrams..i.e some particles may move FTL in a manner not to violate SR and GR,synonymously to how wave function collapse happens. You haven't talked about this question.

Refuting those diagrams is same as saying the Up quark charge is not +2/3 and down quark charge is not -1/3..the foundation of standard model. Anyway...just a question from your understanding- 1-Are there particles/fields that move FTL? Yes/No 2-If there happened to exist could you change your interpretation of facts? Yes/No

The diagrams and descriptions is for the illustration purposes...otherwise the majority of mathematical aspects have already been developed....the math from the diagram that I have, just reproduces Newton laws of gravity then I try relating it to entanglement and relating it to information exchange,deriving E=MC^2 in easiest way for a layman,simple Fourier transformation to relate weak boson with the structures shown in diagram that leads to Mexican hat shaped structure for higgs boson and graviton as standing wave on elementary particles...the other math is introducing EFE components as shown in the initial diagrams in this thread....am not well versed with other complicated math concepts. Those diagrams were derived from simple mathematics of beta emissions, using Feynman diagrams for beta emissions for guidance purposes. I have just those simple math and illustrations...it's only that I saw what am doing to be able to explain all these concepts to a layman before The AI develops to the level of making human intelligence trivial is leading to something wonderful....thats why i entered to this forum. Not to be rude...i think we should just accept our brains are limited to the extended to which we can carry out mathematical operations...some of which require infinite time on human level,that should be carried out by quantum supercomputers...let us and especially in this forum be on the right side of history,that we are entering into an era where pure human reasoning and imagination are importantly required and that the supercomputers are there to crunch the data and do formulations and simulations to sieve our reasoning and imaginations to identify the most viable and useful ones for the exploration of the Universe.

😂 ....i can't fully dismiss your statement.. 'observing nothing'...Just follow the link...isn't that incomprehensible....it's science.

Therefore,when an object/particle goes past the event horizon it will follow a knot worldline and be trapped in these endless worldline...as the pressure and gravitation energy increases towards the blackhole singularity the knot tighten more....leading to formation of gravitons....since the standing wave on elementary particles no longer decays/decouples...moving forward as the knot tightens more it start fusing(the knot merges) ,then the reverse of universe expansion takes place...as illustrated in the the following diagram inwardly; the collapse will happen in reverse whereby higgs fields collapses to top quark...then to leptons.... then to neutrinos to photons...then up to dark photons and dark matter...these will then stabilise the blackhole at the centre,however, as the pressure overwhelmingly increases...the spacetime particles aka virtual particles will start to disintergrate and fall back to singularity as consciousness as illustrated in the diagram; disintergration of spacetime particles aka virtual particles back to consciousness will be favoured towards the core of blackhole.... THEREFORE AT BLACKHOLE SINGULARITY ITS JUST CONSCIOUSNESS PRESENT. Semantics. https://www.google.com/url?q=https://meetings.aps.org/Meeting/APR23/Session/M08.1&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwizn4ybkoz_AhXQdqQEHfAEBzMQFnoECAcQAg&usg=AOvVaw3TiEqrUfw7vxue_raPUeJ1 If you doubt my concepts follow the link...🤩... blackhole is observing.

ILet have a thought experiment,the simplest gravitational wave after graviton decays/decouples from elementary particles will consist of single virtual particles aka spacetime particles interwoven through entanglement via their eigen space... remember this entanglement reduces with reduction of concentration of interwoven virtual particles aka spacetime particles and increase in degree of freedom away from emissions source, where eventually after reaching the highest degree of freedom the virtual particles dilutes to become spacetime fabric. Let's take the basic gravitational wave formed initially as a thread( fibre consisting of interwoven virtual particles aka spacetime particles). Therefore,on top of elementary particles there will be 'threads' spinning out at to less than Planck's time...when elementary particles aggragate(through strong force and other mechanism) the standing waves will undergo constructive interference i.e the 'threads' will get interwoven and entangle more...this happens in tandem with increase in mass. From earlier discussions this 'thread' will become the worldline that the hypothetical object(object without gravitational influence) will follow as it free fall towards mass. Let have a massive body at the verge of collapsing into a blackhole,As the mass was additively becoming massive so were the 'threads' (weak gravitational waves) entangling and getting interwoven to become 'ropes'(strong gravitational waves)...these 'Ropes' entangled to give the event horizon....while under the influence of the massive gravitational forces forming the 'ropes' collapses on themselves to form knot/knots. Therefore,the blackhole becomes a Knot. Remember it's a thought experiments....where imagination matters.

The concept here in is critical in understanding of blackhole formation.