Jump to content

HawkII

Senior Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by HawkII

  1. Play this Music whilst reading.

    1. The retrograde trajectory of 3I/ATLAS is aligned to within 5 degrees with the ecliptic plane of the planets around the Sun, with a probability of 0.2% . This suggests that the trajectory may have been planned.

    2. The arrival time of 3I/ATLAS was fine-tuned to bring it to 29 and 54 million kilometers from Mars and Jupiter, respectively, and be unobservable from Earth at perihelion .

    3. The forecasted perijove distance of 3I/ATLAS during its encounter with Jupiter on March 16, 2026 is 53.6 million kilometers, close to Jupiter’s Hill radius, 53.5 million kilometers . This match includes the non-gravitational acceleration that 3I/ATLAS displayed near perihelion. The rare coincidence might mean that 3I/ATLAS intends to release technological devices at Jupiter’s Lagrange points — where fuel requirements are minimal.

    4. Analysis of the Hubble Space Telescope image from July 21, 2025 suggests that the anti-tail before perihelion must have been in the form of a tightly collimated jet that is about ten times longer than it is wide. This is similar to the tight collimation observed in the latest post-perihelion images. It is difficult to understand how the sublimation of pockets of ice as a result of illumination by sunlight would lead to tightly collimated jets out to a million kilometers. No known comet exhibited a physical sunward jet of this length. For a technological object, a beam of particles might be used to mitigate the risk from the solar wind that would otherwise impact its surface at a relative speed of order 500 kilometers per second and release a hundred thousand times more energy per unit mass than explosives.

    5. At large distances, the rotation axis of 3I/ATLAS was aligned to within 8 degrees with the sunward direction when it entered the solar system. The probability for that is 0.5%.

    6. The observed wobble of the pre-perihelion jet in the direction of the Sun requires the base of the jet to be within 8 degrees from the sun-facing pole, with probability of 0.5%.

    7. The existence of a prominent jet towards the Sun on the way of 3I/ATLAS out of the solar system requires a similar coincidence near the opposite pole of the rotation axis. The fact that a tightly collimated jet appears as the sunward anti-tail both before and after perihelion (while reversing direction at perihelion relative to the direction of motion), has a tiny probability of occurring at random, equal to the square of 0.5% or 0.000025.

    Get Avi Loeb’s stories in your inbox

    Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.

    8. The launch base of the post-perihelion anti-tail jet resided on the nightside of 3I/ATLAS before perihelion and the base of the pre-perihelion anti-tail jet is now on the nightside of 3I/ATLAS after perihelion. For these bases to be active only when facing the Sun, they must be well insulated on the nightside for a period longer than several months. However, heat would naturally flow by conduction throughout the body of a natural comet, making this insulation requirement difficult to satisfy.

    9. The gravitational deflection of 3I/ATLAS by 16 degrees at perihelion, is exactly twice the opening angle of the anti-tail jet. This coincidence allows the wobbling jet around the rotation axis to generate an anti-tail in the direction of the Sun before perihelion and a counter jet on the opposite pole after perihelion, with a jet opening angle of 8 degrees on both poles.

    10. 3I/ATLAS arrived from a direction coincident with the radio “Wow! Signal” to within 9 degrees, with a probability of 0.6% .

    Composition Anomalies of the Gas Shed by 3I/ATLAS:

    11. The gas plume surrounding 3I/ATLAS contains much more nickel than iron, as found in industrially-produced nickel alloys, and a nickel to cyanide ratio that is orders of magnitude larger than for thousands of known comets, including 2I/Borisov. This might indicate a technological origin for these abundances.

    12. The gas plume surrounding 3I/ATLAS contains only 4% water by mass, whereas water is a dominant constituent in familiar solar-system comets . The plume might have resulted from the sunlight releasing the ices and dust that accumulated on the surface of a technological object during its journey through cold dense clouds of the interstellar medium.

    Unusual Physical Properties:

    13. The nucleus of 3I/ATLAS is much more massive than 1I/`Oumuamua and 2I/Borisov, while moving faster than both . There might not be enough rocky material in interstellar space to deliver a natural iceberg of this mass once per decade to the inner solar system . This suggests that 3I/ATLAS may have targeted the inner solar system rather than being drawn at random from the reservoir of interstellar icebergs.

    14. 3I/ATLAS shows extreme negative polarization, unprecedented for all known comets, including 2I/Borisov . This unusual polarization may be related to its unusual anti-tail.

    15. Near perihelion, 3I/ATLAS brightened faster than any known comet and was bluer than the Sun

    Winter Solstice

    This moment marks the shortest day and longest night of the year in the Northern Hemisphere, where the Earth reaches its maximum tilt away from the Sun.

  2. ·

    Edited by HawkII

    1 hour ago, Phi for All said:

    Can you explain to me why it's so important that the USA has ruled out aliens as a possible source for these UAPs? You aren't clear at all, you cite no sources, you quote yourself without adding further clarity, and when you quote others you don't address their responses.

    I assume the "Ohhhhhhhhhhhhh" post was implying sarcasm, but you need context for sarcasm to be effective. I don't think anyone knows exactly what you're on about. Why is the USA stance regarding UAPs as non-alien a fact that's never been truer?

    It's not important, it's my thought.

    America wouldn't want to start a war with an Alien race.

    I quoted myself there because I mentioned Balloons.

    I don't respond "Enough" for your liking to quotes.

    Edit:- Yes the Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhh is sarcasm, because of the (!)

    It's never been truer because of the Debunking YouTube video by the Guy who debunked the UAP to be a Balloon in Yemen.

    1 hour ago, swansont said:

    Nobody posted an update or link

    I assume other peoples YouTube Homepage Algorithm is the same as mine.

  3. ·

    Edited by HawkII

    On 9/14/2025 at 2:42 PM, HawkII said:

    You are familiar with the JellyFish UAP that most likely turned out to be balloons are you not?

    Now that the UAP that got fired at by a Hell FIre missile over Yemen got debunked as a Balloon also, the fact that the USA has never thought of UAPs as Aliens remains true. Truer than ever in fact.

  4. ·

    Edited by HawkII

    20 hours ago, zapatos said:

    Well, they probably didn't believe THAT UAP was of alien origin. I don't think you can draw any conclusions about other UAPs.

    Ohhhhhhhhhhhhh; So to the American, only the Super Jelly Fish UAPs are Aliens, but the Armoured BoxFish UAPs are Drones(!) lol

    Remember; The Americans believe that some Arab Country has like a Proper Mothership Drone, which they used to spy on them during all the drones flying over their country that time.

  5. ·

    Edited by HawkII

    I would like to say; If the American Government were happy to fire a Hell Fire Missile at the UAP. They CLEARLY don't believe the UAPs are of Alien origin.

    Which leaves with me two options and they are both REALLY strange.

    1: They believe they are China or Russian Drones

    2: They believe it could be some sort of amphibious undiscovered life like an armoured Box Fish or Super JellyFish

    Edit: I missed, this was supposed to be in Speculations. Ooops. Sorry.

    2nd Edit: Politics, I'm happy with that.

  6. 32 minutes ago, dimreepr said:

    You're a strange cove, it's almost like you're attempting to rile both sides of the coin, do you live near a bridge?

    They said the same thing about the show 'Ancient Aliens'

    I am not Trolling, I am involved in a fun thought excercise

    18 minutes ago, pinball1970 said:

    He didn't, he was one of them.

    Of course I know that God is/was one of them.

    17 minutes ago, swansont said:

    But some signs in the Bible could not, such as Joshua 10:13 “the sun stood still, and the moon stopped”

    Seems God's best bet would be to mess with the Moon.

    Hold it still

    Or

    Turn it Red

  7. ·

    Edited by HawkII

    11 hours ago, swansont said:

    We have books.

    We’re aware of the Greek and Roman gods. Gods from Mesopotamia, even.

    But they’re gods. What would stop them from sending “signs” or appearing in visions, or whatever. I don’t understand what the conundrum is here.

    The conundrum is;

    In these modern times, the "signs" can be so easily explained away with science.

    I'm still astonished that God needed an Angel Posse to help take down the two Cities of Soddom and Gommora. The great City of Troy was the size of London Trainstation. Each of these two Cities must have been even smaller than that one. On top of all this they couldn't ensure the safety of the people retreating.

    If this God showed up today, we would just say they were Aliens. (Whilst talking to them without looking at them)

  8. 8 hours ago, dimreepr said:

    Remind me, what is it that you want to discuss?

    Also, can you confirm, which side of the coin you believe in (God good or god bad)?

    Knowing what we know about the Gods, how could they remind people to believe in them if one day people forgot them.

    We are referring to all the Gods here. Even Norse Loki.

  9. ·

    Edited by HawkII

    8 hours ago, pinball1970 said:

    She was instructed not to look back at the destruction of Sodom which she failed to do.

    One of the angels was Yhwh himself so he could have:

    1. Told her, "When I say don't look back I mean don't look back!"

    2. Maimed her in some way without killing her, say cut her little finger off.

    3. Something else less lethal than turning her into a pillar of salt.

    LOL; Yhwh him/her self turns people into pillars of salt if they look at them?! No wonder they needed a Son (or Human Form of themself) when they were (or became a Father/Mother to) Jesus.

  10. ·

    Edited by HawkII

    2 hours ago, pinball1970 said:

    I would not have thought anything was too tricky for gods, they are gods.

    But we know from the Bible that if people see the Angels they will turn to Pillars of Salt. They never mentioned an off switch.

  11. 2 hours ago, TheVat said:

    You seem unfamiliar with forum rules here. Topics are not two-way conversations and any member may participate and request clarifications and supporting citations for any claims made. If you can be courteous and tell us what a "Narcissists Supply Three" and "psychologically gay" refer to, you will help advance the discussion for everyone. Clarity and definition of terminology is of vital importance to all chats here.

    X-post w/Swanson

    I thought you were coming off as rude.

    Right;

    In psychoanalytic theory, narcissistic supply is attention or admiration that is pathologically or excessively needed from codependents.

    Proof All Narcissistic Men Are Psychologically Gay

  12. ·

    Edited by HawkII

    3 hours ago, TheVat said:

    We might have a Google translator glitch here. Can you explain what that means?

    Before we look into that, can you tell us what that means and offer some supporting research for it. I really have no idea what you're talking about.

    With all due respect, you are not the OP. This was intended for the OP who presumably would be interested enough to Google these terms.

  13. ·

    Edited by HawkII

    I've spent a lot of this Year studying Narcissism.

    I have been a Narcissists Supply Three times. They (The Narcs) were at different stages of awareness of their condition.

    They have very limited Empathy, due to not being in many social situations, due to their other shortcomings.

    Example; A NiceGuy Narcissist pretends to be Nice because they feel like that's what's preventing them from having Friends, when in actuality, the reason they don't actually have friends is because there's not enough similar Mean spirited people around them.

    The Variant of Narc they are is the Mask they wear to overcome their own shortcoming.

    In all honesty I would call it Maskism.

    Then on top of that, you got to look into how all Narcissists are 'Psychologically gay'

  14. 12 hours ago, geordief said:

    Is this the passage in question?(Good News translation,whatever that is..)

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good_News_Bible

    YouVersion | The Bible App | Bib...
    No image preview

    Deuteronomy 4:19-20 Do not be tempted to worship and serv...

    Do not be tempted to worship and serve what you see in the sky—the sun, the moon, and the stars. The LORD your God has given these to all other peoples for them to worship. But you are the people he r
  15. ·

    Edited by HawkII

    9 hours ago, swansont said:

    Partial credit, since it refers to people who rejected him, not people who didn’t know he existed, as you had said.

    "What do people do, who don't know you exist?" God replied "I made the Moon for people to Worship"

    So God did not make the moon for them to worship

    6 hours ago, exchemist said:

    Ah, the light dawns. You have completely misconstrued the meaning of this.

    Excuse me. You have the wrong end of the stick here.

    I did read Years ago

    "What do people do, who don't know you exist?" God replied "I made the Moon for people to Worship"

    I am showing by showing another passage I found after Googling that God has previous. This makes what I read far more believable.

    I am sorry to cast you all back into the Shadow Realm.

    Boy oh boy if I could go back in time to when I read the passage that I did from the Bible that I have in my Bookcase right now I would be sure to write down the Page number.

  16. ·

    Edited by HawkII

    God's go-to Moon Get-out clause in action.

    Google search

    god gave non believers the Moon to worship

    Result

    Acts 7:42

    New International Version
    But God turned away from them and gave them over to the worship of the sun, moon and stars. This agrees with what is written in the book of the prophets: “’Did you bring me sacrifices and offerings forty years in the wilderness, people of Israel?

  17. 2 hours ago, Ghideon said:

    According to who or what? A reference would be appropriate; your comment is not based on writings I am able to find in the bible*.



    *) with my rather limited knowledge about this topic

    It went on to say that people who lived and died not knowing God but worshipped the Moon would be given a free pass because they didn't know any better. I'm starting to remember it a little more.

  18. ·

    Edited by HawkII

    Something that's just occurred to me. Would the Satan and equivalents be able to Hypothetically do anything about everyone forgetting Religion? Would they want to?

    2 hours ago, Eise said:

    No way. False memories of what the bible really says, and giving this as an excuse to trust you:

    No, you do not get respect from me on this point. And even trying to wriggle out with such an excuse:

    From the Expanded Bible.

    So unless you are at least 2000 years old, and can read Hebrew, no, it was not really changed since then.

    I don't know why you are so hung up on this. God had done a real solid for the people who had yet to hear about Judaism and Christianity.

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.