Z.10.46

v is no longer a vector when v=c, so v-1=c-1 with 1 being a scalar unit of m/s is also not a vector but a scalar. c=299,792,458 m/s, so c-1=299,792,457 m/s.

v is no longer a vector when v=c, so v-1=c-1 with 1 is sclaire with unité m/s is not a vector either, but merely scalars with the same unit. c=3.10^8 m/s, and c-1=(3.10^8-1) m/s have the same unit. E=m*c^2 is true for low velocities, but for velocities close to the speed of light, we have E=M(v)*c^2. So, here E=M(c)*c^2=-M(c-1)*c^2.

Sorry, I don't speak English, I use a translator to understand and respond. Here's the answer to the first question: In my question here, is it permissible to use infinity, which is not defined in physics, to assume the impossibility of traveling at the speed of light? I noticed that in all other theories in physics, they try to define what corresponds to infinity as a finite value. However, in the theory of relativity, this is not the case, and infinity is preserved as it is to conclude that nothing can exceed the speed of light. For the second question: I provided the analogy with the Casimir effect, where it gives a well-defined finite value to a divergent series 1+2+3...=-1/12. There are also other examples in physics where it does the same. For your third question, I didn't understand the connection with this discussion. Could you please clarify your question and its relevance to the discussion? "Could you define what 'infinite energy' or 'infinite mass' means in physics😁? And why do we try to attribute a finite value to it in all physical theories except for relativity? I have defined for relativity it as M(c)=-M(c-1), and E=-c^2*M(c-1). It's just a matter of conducting the experiment to know what actually happens.☺️

@studiot Could you please clarify your question? that make it difficult to understand. If you can provide a clearer version of your question, I'd be happy to help explain it and its connection to the discussion. And this question here, for everyone: I received a publication offer for this theory. Is this journal reputable? Editorial Board Dr Lin Li (US) || Wenlin Gong (China) 25+ Million Reader base Dear Dr. Greetings from the Journal of Modern and Applied Physics! We have gone through your previous article entitled “The existence of a physical phenomenon that accelerates particles with mass to the speed of light and transforms them into dark energy and dark matter”. We know your expertise so; we are glad to invite you to submit any type of article for our prestigious journal. Your contribution is of great importance for us and it will help the journal to establish its high standards. The Journal aims to provide the most reliable source of information on the current developments in the area of acoustics, astrophysics and geophysics, biophysics, computational physics, condensed matter physics, engineering physics, laser and quantum electronics, medical physics, optics, semiconductor physics and devices, solid state physics, space physics. We went through your article and wanted to appreciate you for your article, which is very engrossing and enlightening. We, the Editorial member of the Journal of Modern and Applied Physics, believe that our readers will be inspired upon reading your article. Advantages of publishing with us Many journals wait several months to decide on a paper after it has been submitted, which is often frustrating for authors. Peer review is typically finished by our Journal staff in 6 weeks. Therefore, waiting more than 8 weeks for a decision is extremely uncommon. Many authors have discovered that the feedback from our peer reviewers significantly improves their finished papers. Recently Published articles in the Journal Configuring observables solving method quantum matrix gravity the proton and neutron as distortional structures in the geometric manifold. The modification of Newton's gravitational law and its application in the study of dark matter and black holes. String-like elementary particles based on photon Time Blast Wave Theory for the Expansion of the Universe Black holes as geometric distortional extrema The energy "time" Submission Link-https://www.pulsus.com/submissions/modern-applied-physics.html Anticipating your interest with a quick reply. Cordially, Managing Editor +44-7723-59-8358 Journal of Modern and Applied Physics

bove all, we need negative energy E=-c^2M(c-1). There are many different ways to obtain such energy, even with acceleration, and it can manifest a few moments before the impact. Exemple : If we consider an atom, we can say that the formation and breakup of an atom can define negative energy. The amount of energy absorbed during the breakup of an atom is the same as the amount of energy released during the formation of that atom. The energy supplied to break an atom is considered as negative energy.

Could you observe dark matter or dark energy? The main purpose of the experiment is to observe any missing particles before the impact and to confirm that the total energy is conserved, thereby confirming that these particles have indeed reached the speed of light to transform with M(c)=-M(c-1).

Yes, but we don't have the test before the impact just to see if all the particles are there. We conduct the test only after the impact to observe any newly emerged particles, like the Higgs boson, and to ensure that the total energy is conserved.

I can suggest an experiment instead: if we accelerate two packets to collide and annihilate each other, we can verify that all the particles are present before the impact. If some particles are missing, but the measured energy remains the same, it means that some particles have already transformed without being detected.

We provide work greater than the energy of the object to give it negative energy. There's also the case of the electron, which already has negative energy. There's nothing preventing us from conceiving this experiment with an object of mass m0 so that it has an energy E=-c^2M(c-1) and see if it transforms into dark matter or invisible dark energy. We can also look for natural phenomena capable of doing this, such as black holes or quantum vacuum, which could also be potential sources of this transformation.

Experiments need to be conducted to test and find out exactly what happens. Perhaps the phenomenon is very brief on the time scale, like the appearance of quantum vacuum fluctuations with negative energy. Here, for example, in physics, when energy is negative. Do you know that in quantum solutions, when they had negative energy, it was a sign that antiparticles existed? https://fr.lambdageeks.com/when-energy-can-be-negative/ And here, there is a way to make the energy of an object negative. https://fr.lambdageeks.com/can-energy-be-negative/

@Genady Yes, but it is not certain that if we accelerate a packet of particles, some particles will transform with M(c)=-M(c-1) without even realizing it. That doesn't prevent the regularization by the zeta function from solving the problem. If the Casimir effect is not measured, one would assume it to be an infinite energy. Here, it's not just speculation but a formula based on mathematics, and we can test these formulas well. I would be interested, for example, in creating negative energy E=-c^2*M(c-1) and with m0 for object , to see if it would disappear and transform into dark energy or dark matter. @studiot Could you give an example of a physical theory that keeps infinity in its equations without assigning it a finite value to draw conclusions, similar to how the theory of relativity deals with the impossibility of reaching the speed of light without transforming the infinity generated at v=c by its finite value?

It is here that the problem of infinite energy or infinite mass arises, indicating that it is impossible not to reach the speed of light. However, we cannot draw conclusions here because we step outside the context of the theory by assuming the existence of infinity within this theory. When we try to give meaning to this infinity, similar to the Casimir effect, we find -M(c-1), which justifies why we do not observe a particle with mass moving at the speed of light, as it becomes undetectable and transforms into dark energy or dark matter with a negative relative mass -M(c-1). Maybe particles are already transforming if you accelerate it with finite energy(And this infinite energy can also be calculated using the zeta regularization method E=-c^2*M(c-1)) but you don't even realize it because in the end the energy balance would be preserved.

However, in relativity, we have concluded that as an object's velocity approaches the speed of light (v=c), its mass becomes infinite, or its energy becomes infinite. Yet, we have not observed a particle with mass traveling at the speed of light. However, in the Casimir effect, we encounter the sum of positive integers resulting in infinity (1+2+3...=infinity). However, the observation yields a sum of (-1/12) for this divergent series 1+2+3... The regularization by the zeta function justifies the equivalence of infinity to (-1/12) for this series. Here, the concept of mass becoming infinite at v=c (-M(c)) could explain why we do not observe particles with mass moving at the speed of light, as they might transform into undetectable dark energy or dark matter.

Here, we're not talking about surpassing the speed of light but being equal to the speed of light. This particle would no longer have a positive relative mass but a negative one, -M(c-1). It is uncertain whether this contradicts causality, but these particles could potentially explain dark energy and dark matter. Dark matter and dark energy exist without contradicting causality.

Yes, I agree with you regarding the Casimir effect. However, the question here is why we retained infinity to assume that no object with mass can exceed the speed of light, even though when attempting to regularize this infinity using the zeta function, we obtain a finite value for the expression of the relative mass M(v)=m0/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2), which equals -M(c) and can explain the expansion of the universe, for example..

Is it permissible to use infinity(infinity mass or infinity energy), which is not defined in physics, to assume the impossibility of traveling at the speed of light? Here is an example of using regularization via the $ zeta$ function in the Casimir effect: Mathematical calculations lead to the famous divergent series $1+2+3+\ldots=+\infty$. However, the physical results do not correspond to infinite values for the energy of the moving plates. To resolve this issue, we applied regularization through the Riemann zeta function. Eventually, we obtain a finite value of $-1/2$ for the divergent series $1+2+3+…$, and this result provides a good explanation for the Casimir effect. The regularization of the expression of the relative mass M(v) at v=c yields M(c)=-M(c-1), which can have a physical significance, as in the Casimir effect. For more details, please refer to the attached file. Vitesse de lumiere.pdf