KrallSpace29

That's true though but that's still good.

Maybe if it were kept moving then it might not be so susceptible to biological growth. But even freshwater isn't biology free. There has to be an easy way to make this happen. A few small scale experiments could easily determine the right way to go about using saltwater in toilets for waste removal. I was thinking if it were all pvc that would be a good start, as for the intakes and channels, etcetera, someone (chemist, whatever), could design components that are impervious to such growth. A series of small scale experiments can do it. Now lets just put our wallets together...

You could probably run something through the pipes that would make them more applied to the application. I was wondering the same thing. Maybe could lead to good jobs that we need. How many toilets have boilers hahahah

The title is pretty self explanatory. Seems like it may be a good idea to use the vast amounts of saltwater in the ocean for eliminating waste to the treatment plants, or maybe waste treatment could be looked at a little differently. Or even to have the option to take a saltwater shower sometimes might be a good, even saving fresh water usage even more. I wouldn't feel so bad pushing the flush lever if I knew the water were saltwater.

That may be a factor, and even if it is the most abundant greenhouse gas present in the atmosphere, there are still solutions to the problem. Many scientists don't even know how to even go about approaching such an issue. You have to start with your knowledge base and then begin to apply it to real world problems in realtime. Physics will be the answer, or solution whatever you may call it to climate change. It depends on who can apply the most advanced technology available (me) to any issue related to the climate. If there's a problem there's a solution, that's just how life is. Its like stropping your straight razor morning right? because everyone does that. Every action has an equal to or opposite reaction.

Oh Word! Good to know. Now if I can build a better reputation I'll be alright. haha

Still learning about this forum, If there's a way to respond to individual posts that someone could tell me about that would be great, otherwise I guess I'll have to respond to the entire thread. Digital time I would describe as just a numerical marker instead of a universal reminder. It could be both.

So no one liked the lamp idea?

Exactly that's what I'm saying. It's fine if its always being disturbed, (moving), this is healthy and normal. What a huge problem potentially could be would be when there are massive cavities in the atmospheric layers. This would definitely be a reason for irregular weather as the layers in the atmosphere now are not homogenous. You will have pockets of warm air rising around these cavities which in turn could definitely cause prolonged flooding and heat in some areas. The cavitations in the water easily fix themselves as the air just rises back to the air/water surface. Can someone give me some up votes, came off to a rocky start. It would be interesting to know exactly how many ballistics misses are being tested daily, along with other rockets and explosives detonations. Then you may look at global warming as the result of an improperly functioning atmosphere instead of a problem directly related to greenhouse gases. Truthfully, I don't think it's the greenhouse gases alone causing all of the problems. The more I've been thinking about this the more I began to think it was also something else. Which is good because there are direct technological fixes for these problems.

What I'm saying is that the atmosphere has a very particular way in which it likes to settled. Who knows how intricate it may be. I sure don't. I do know though that if there are actually these types of layers in the atmosphere exist, and if there were to be perpetually disturbed, we would definitely have problems.

Haha sorry I was just poking around to see how serious you guys really were. I don't want to waste my time either.

I have come to this conclusion based on time dilation which has occurred in my awareness in the last year or two. I've been reading a lot of Riemannian and Tensor Calculus in the last year, and am still becoming more aware of what each and anveryone's human mind can do. We're more powerful than you think, a lot of people have succumbed to the media and other. Since I did this Antarctica went from melting to freezing, a deep freeze actually. The North pole can be fixed once the Southern one is, this can't happen at the same time.

No, and no. It would mean that when you're looking at a digital clock you would still have some kind of an idea of what time is. Your mind can't give meaning to meaningless, material things. It wouldn't be visible from Earth. However is being there would mean there is a Universal time constant for everyone who needs it, which is everyone.

Hey Forum, My last input for the time being, but here's a little more food for thought. I originally posted both of these as responses to solicitations on the NASA NSPIRES website, this was wasn't taken seriously, the other I abandoned after seeing how this one went. The title is basically as obvious as it sounds, the technology would ultimately be attached to a rocket as a payload, and planted on the moon. The basic concept behind this is to create a Universal timeframe in realtime for everyone on Earth. A lot of people are trying to do this with automatic watches, and this kind of works but it's not the entire picture. Also not everyone has enough money to afford a nice automatic watch, or the experience to be able to wear it correctly all of the time. This would fix all of that. It's become difficult, and almost impossible for some people to think outside of the box. This is possibly due to the large amount of technology constantly orbiting the Earth, including the space station and other satellites/telescopes. I think that if there were a clock on the moon, and also a stopwatch with an infinite end, perhaps, some people would be able to glance at the digital clocks on their computer screens and in their cars and still have some kind of merit to what time it actually is. Something cool to think about before you get back to work, will help your mind to be able to rest periodically throughout the day. A lot of people look up from the digital clocks in their cars and expect to be taken away from their immediate reality, just to find themselves back in their car. I think a clock on the moon would provide a better and more full spectrum of time itself, and there would be less stress in traffic ;and navigation of the waking world itself might become a little more interesting. Basically giving digital time some kind of a backbone is what this is all about. Right now there's well, nothing there. Thanks again, let me know what you guys think.

Trial and error in with a regular lamp stand, and a bulb a had which ended up being no good for the application. I knew had had to have been doing something, from a physics standpoint I haven't been able to explain it yet, presently that is not my goal. Right now I'm just trying to network so I can share what I've been doing.

Hey Everyone, I'm new to the forum but am looking forward to engaging with people who are also interested in brainstorming for solutions. And another thing I've been having a hard time with, what happens when you actually come across a potentially world fixing/changing solution but don't have the funds or resources to make it happen? This has been a problem for me recently. Anyways, I have had an idea that could potentially have a dramatically beneficial cooling impact on the Climate, It would be an atmosphere lamp; located on either pole. I've tried this before a few times on a small scale and it has already prevented multiple apocalyptic warming scenarios. This is something that NASA should already be looking into. I haven't been able to exactly describe the phenomena just yet as I would be wasting my time if I were to try, I have to keep going with other things, but I'm sure if I had a group of people to work with this could be easily achieved. Back to the lamp, I have found that if you are to orient a nice LED light bulb in a lamp, (I used a GE LED), it instantly and definitely has a dramatic effect on correcting the layers of the atmosphere. When I did this I think it may have corrected a disgusting amount of disorganization in the atmosphere from all the atomic bomb testing in the 50's, 60's, and so forth. Even firing a gun causes cavities in the atmosphere which otherwise would last for an indefinite amount of time until something disturbs where the cavitation occurred, light is good for doing this. Referring to Newtons first law, all of the cavitation produced from all of these projectiles in war need to be made up for, or else we're doomed to climate change. If NASA could install two lamps on either pole even if it were purely experimental, I think this could be a great step towards a climate that we would have under control. The name of the game at this point is controlling the climate, which is definitely very possible, actually it would be too easy if everyone were working together. Back on track, I think if we had two decently sized GE LED lightbulbs pointed outward towards space at either pole, the poles would have a better chance at refreezing. Simple, and they could control these from a HQ wherever they need it be. (Brightness, timing, etc). Thoughts? Please let me know looking forward to hearing from you guys.