grayson

How do I solve it different than? Wait, I think i know, Just give me a second (3/11)+x11+9x+(3/1)x+C If that is wrong, please tell me why so I can get a better understanding Crap, I put it through chatgpt and I realized I made a subtraction mistake

Hello my name is Grayson. Answer this poll please!

I am not going to specify my age here. But I am ahead of my time. I finally understand most of calculus and now want to get into some other complicated stuff. The only problem is that I have a short attention span. I need something I can read and something that keeps it interesting to understand matrixes or linear algebra. Can anyone help me?

I would donate my brain to research. I would donate my appendix to Chernobyl so that they can research radioactivity on a non-important organ. But if I ever get my appendix removed, I will keep it because I am weird that way. I will either donate my other organs to research or other people. If I ever get famous I would love to think that people get my organs and are happy that they got a famous persons organs.

Everyone, I have solved my first problem! (We will use italic s as the integral sign) s(3x10+9+3x)dx= (((3/11)x11+c)+(9x+c)+((3/1)x1+c)) Please tell me if I solved this right or not. I learned these skills from chat gpt.

I know slang evolves over time. But why do we use any slang at all? Is there an evolutionary point to it?

Lets say there is there is two lines. Each pointing an infinitesimal rate at each other. So imagine one at -00000000...etc1 and one at 000000000...etc1. Would the lines be parallel or perpendicular?

Number one yes, we should, and number two, what would be ethical is maybe, interviews or just watching them. Here is a concept, Maybe there should be a program where the parents watch their kids (Especially neurodivergent) and report back on their behaviors. But still give them the space they need.

I have autism and ADHD. But I don't think it is necessarily "bad" to research these behaviors. If we want to have a better understanding of human behavior and neurodivergent behavior and how the human brain differs. I think we should research. Here is another question. What if instead of researching behavior, we research the organs of organ donors? Is that ethical? It would be good for innovation. But idk if it is ethical or not. What do you think?

Okay good. I was saying that but the person kept saying it was times. But also what would the difference between f(x) and f x (With respect to) be?

Also, I have a question. In a function when I say f(x) does that mean f*x. Because I had an argument with someone over that

Can I find that in a library?

That means it is the first derivitive, right?

Hmmm, The calculus book did use that as an example, but didn't get the point to me clearly enough i guess

So it has to be in parentheses first? which means it would be (54) instead of 54?

When you say that is wrong are you saying in derivatives or antiderivatives? Because that was in the derivatives section

Well in my calculus for dummies book, The power rule said that 54 = 4*53 I don't know how that has anything to do with the last equation I said. And yes I understand the concept of what you are saying

I know what an antiderivative is. I am just having trouble solving it. Like for example, why does X1/2(X-2)=(x3/2-2x1/2)?

Hello, my name is Grayson. I am more a scientific person than anything else. So, I don't use slang as much as any other foe. But why do people use slang? What is the evolutionary point of it? I don't know whether I should've put this in philosophy or biology, but treat this as both.

Well, At firt I thought heat*atomic number*number of atoms surrounding it*number of electrons*...etc etc/ the number of perameters you use But Idk

Remember the "Rumpelstiltskin theory" or the "Atomic adaptation theory"? Well the equation for it evolved a lot but off screen I have changed it to A=O*C A is the current state of the atom. O is the original, or the state of the last time the equation ran through (I will explain it in C) C operates as a time function and signifies change. How do I make a unit for the "State of an atom" or "Change of enviroment"?

If you live in some parts of the USA, including Utah, you will know that gambling is illegal. Now suddenly you visit another state, and you find the lottery everywhere. Now one thing I have noticed is that arcade machines are everywhere. I have even seen ones with money. So, If there is an arcade machine with money in it, wouldn't that make it gambling? and in my opinion, claw machines are worse than gambling. Even if you do win, you got nothing of value. What is your opinion on this.

The state of the atom and c are the same C is just A but instead of being an absolute value it is with respect to time. So that means Beta=A(o)*c c= H*N*E*L*Delta*...etc/Omega (Number of units used in C) with respect to t (Time) A=c (Without respect to time) Beta= C but treat it as a different variable so we can clear confusion Beta=A(o) t For the units for C you either do the metric system or scientific system (Such as kelvin)

That is a great question! The units are H (Heat), N (Number of atoms), E (Number of electrons),L (Half life) and Delta (Atomic number) The more factors you add the more complex it gets but it wont work without respect to time.

Hello, my name is Grayson. Anyone coming from the Rumpelstiltskin theory should read this. I have created a lot of chaos with my Rumpelstiltskin theory. Which is why I renamed it to the atomic adaptation theory. The theory states that atoms tend to adapt to their environment. That is literally it. The whole thing started in a topic called "What draws the line at life?" That didn't go so well. The second was the Rumpelstiltskin theory where I explained how atoms are sort of "Alive" Well this theoy has the same methematical formula as the rumpelstiltskin theory, but it is just a new name. Here is the formula you have been waiting for: A(t)=A(o)*c t A(t) or a of t is the atoms state at the current time. A(o) is its original state. c is the change in its environment the whole equation is with respect to time which means it repeats itself over and over in an infinitesimal rate. (Infinite times in a second) Each time the equation repeats itself, the A(t) changes to the last A(o). The first time it repeats A(o) and A(t) are the same That should mean that A(t)=A(o) t (With respect to time) I repeat, the two equations are A(t)=A(o)*c t and A(t)=A(o) t Please co-operate with me on this one. I need all the help I can get.