-
Posts
207 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by grayson
-
Great timing! Just made a formula right now! A(t)=A(o)*c t A(t) or a of t is the atoms state at the current time. A(o) is its original state. c is the change in its environment the whole equation is with respect to time which means it repeats itself over and over in an infinitesimal rate. (Infinite times in a second) Each time the equation repeats itself, the A(t) changes to the last A(o). The first time it repeats A(o) and A(t) are the same That should mean that A(t)=A(o) t (With respect to time)
-
Well sort. I just mean a way to think about physics and atoms is that everything (Whether it seems living or not) Has a system similar to anything living. It tries to stay living. I will give you more examples of this living. Whatever the thing that happens at the end of an atom's half-life/death. Mostly because it was unable to be stable and died. The reason we don't see a hybrid of every element on the periodic table is because the atoms don't need to do that to survive It would have no purpose plus it does not have eight electrons. Maybe if their was a mathematical concept to back this up It could be explained better
-
Honestly, I have no idea what o means it must've been a weird typo. I just mean that everything tries to stay in one state or form for as long as possible.
-
Well f is a function an integral usually finds the area under a curve but I remember more about indefinite than definite. Indefinite is jut reverse derivatives but I don't know how x^1/2(x-2) equals (x^3/2 - 2x^1/2) And when I say definite integral I mean antiderivative. I am expecting to learn calculus and Integrals. But the book stumped me at integrals.
-
I am just saying that instead of reacting to the point where i say "prove me wrong" React to the actual post. I want to improve my "Who knows what you call it" so I need "Feedback" Sometimes context can be important
-
No, I don't want anyone to prove me wrong. But I am ready for criticism. And The "Rumpelstiltskin theory" Isn't trying to disprove anything else. I am just telling my idea of what a natural law of the universe could be. And the reason I said that is because I am just putting my opinion out there and than I suddenly get into an argument with a random person who has a degree in who knows what. I am just learning as a hobby, and I don't want to argue with anyone. Guys, focus on the actual theory instead of one part of the crapping topic where I say, "PrOvE mY tHeOrY wRoNg!" I don't care about that! If this is how things keep going, I might just find another forum! and this forum was hard to find! and my theory is just experimental, not pseudoscience! so let me say in a calm and constructive way. react to the actual post. I need feedback
-
Hello, I have constructed a theory. And before you question why I called it the Rumpelstiltskin theory read this: The Rumpelstiltskin theory is called the Rumpelstiltskin theory because he ripped himself in half. My theory states atoms like to do the opposite. If you can think of a better name tell me. Anyways lets get to the theory: The Rumpelstiltskin theory states that atoms are, in a sense, a "Living" organism and o things to stay "Alive". If you don't believe me compare these things. Electromagnetism/Metabolism. Photon emitting/Reproduction. Vibrations from heat/homeostasis. If you still don't believe me, there are way more examples you can find everywhere. Now I am not inherently saying it is "Living" but I am saying (Not in a literal sense) to treat an atom like that. This theory can help better understand things such as Half-Life or Genetics (maybe) If you want to prove my theory wrong, tell me.
-
What draws the line at life?
grayson replied to grayson's topic in Evolution, Morphology and Exobiology
I really don't know what to say. I was just trying to get an answer to a question. I think I have found a better answer than biology. My concept isn't called anything yet but I will explain it as, everything in the universe wants to stay together or "Alive". Atoms aren't necessarily "Alive" but they do try to stay stable and not alive. That is why you see more oxygen or hydrogen than praseodymium. Technically there is some kind of system in atoms that makes them form into something or evolve into creatures. I think this concept is useful for a lot of things. Remember, this isn't just about biology anymore. I might post my concept on another topic. -
Hello, my name is Grayson and one day, I would like to work on a project. It is a lightsaber made of tantalum hafnium carbide. It uses induction heating and convection to hopefully heat it up to 3000 degrees. There are a few thinks to think about before making the lightsaber. Number one, there has to be a heat resistant material to keep the heat away from the handles. Number two, (Optional) The handle has to be retractable, and durable (In case you have ever seen the pocket staff durability videos) and it has to be in the shape of a foil. Now the idea is that it gets so hot that it looks more "circular". Just throwing out an idea (If you make this give me credit)
-
Well, you are finding the definite integral from a to b of the derivative of f which equals f of b minus f of a
-
What draws the line at life?
grayson replied to grayson's topic in Evolution, Morphology and Exobiology
I really don't know the purpose. But I can think of one. Thinking of an atom, or anything as a living thing can help us better understand it. Everything in the universe naturally wants to keep itself together with things like gravity, or chemical reactions. Studying the theory of how everything want to stay "alive" can help us better understand the universe. -
What draws the line at life?
grayson replied to grayson's topic in Evolution, Morphology and Exobiology
Yes, In my definition an atom can be a living organism. But it is hard to draw the line because I had to actively search for a sort of "metabolism" for atoms. -
What draws the line at life?
grayson replied to grayson's topic in Evolution, Morphology and Exobiology
I would probably say for chemistry in forms of complexity. Edit: But If i had to define it it would be any sort of system keeping it "alive" -
What draws the line at life?
grayson replied to grayson's topic in Evolution, Morphology and Exobiology
I don't understand what you mean by "Which purpose?" I don't clearly understand what you mean. Does life actually have a purpose? -
What draws the line at life?
grayson replied to grayson's topic in Evolution, Morphology and Exobiology
Okay here is a concept. Atoms and electrons reproduce light (Reproduction). They "bind" into molecules (Adaptation/Reproduction). They react to other chemicals (Homeostasis/response to stimuli). They even respond to heat (Homeostasis). They also need electromagnetism to stay together (Metabolism). Doies that mean they are living? -
What draws the line at life?
grayson replied to grayson's topic in Evolution, Morphology and Exobiology
That is what I am trying to figure out. What is living and what is not. -
I have had a dilemma for years. See my science teacher said that a living organism has to have a number of things to be alive. Stuff like reproduction, and homeostasis. But a mule does not reproduce so, does that make it not living? I would think that anything that has a sort of consciousness is living. But a virus has no consciousness of any sort (We can talk about that later in this topic, after the basics are done). So, what is a living organism? Well, anything with a system of sorts is living. Let me explain. An atom is very complicated and It uses electrons which reproduce photons (We are getting somewhere). Electrons also bind atoms together, and this can happen until it creates an actual organism. So does mean an atom is a living thing? I don't know, you can decide. Also, atoms have homeostasis. Don't read the next line if you want to guess. (Chemical reactions)
-
Okay, Thanks. But their three atoms. A faint glowing one, a bright glowing one, and a clumped together one. I don't know which is which, and if the "clumped one" is even an atom. I wish I had a video Also, Is this real?
-
Okay, Case closed
-
Okay, Just ignore the last part. Is manifestation real? Because I have had times where I was thinking of bugs in the shower and a spider crawled in.
-
I have heard from people who would rather be anonymous that manifestation is scientifically proven. Is this true? I have no idea. Then my existential crisis kicks in. I would think that everybody sees, and tastes, and has all of their senses different. So, then what color is an apple really? Well, it has no color. It is just photons which don't have a true color. But is the universe real? I don't know, so all I would say is that your brain is the universe. As there is no "true" universe so it makes random crap to make it make sense. We don't know if we are a brain in a jar, making up consciousness so everything can make sense. Therefore, your conscious mind must control something in the universe. Me after realizing I just posted complete pseudoscience:
-
Here is the link someone gave me in my "String theory research" topic: See the Highest-Resolution Atomic Image Ever Captured - Scientific American Anyways, I want to know what atom/Ion this is. I would guess that is is Hydrogen and helium. But I am skeptical. And Are those molecules I am looking at? Idk, please help.
-
I mean integrate something edit: oops
-
Not much. I know they can be used to find an area under a curve. I know a little about definite integrals. They show the area from one point to another. I know a little about Simpsons and trapezoid rules, but I don't know how to use them.
-
I don't understand the indefinite integral, And I don't understand what goes into an integral. Sometimes I put integrate f(x)=dx into a calculus calculator and nothing comes out.