Chris Sawatsky

I read every comment and all I get is "You're Wrong!" No one has the courage to share what they believe is the truth. I am not arguing or standing behind the standard explanation and theories. It's all just information as far as I am concerned and I won't consider any of it TRUTH until the day its proven beyond a reasonable doubt. If you disagree with the current explanation of the beginning of the universe then publish your theory and set the record straight. I am simply cutting and pasting what is printed on the websites that belong to several of the major Universities and institutions that you and others received your degrees from. Anyone can disagree with anything but can you prove it is wrong or are you a contrarian like many of the people on this site?

First I want to say that I believe women have always been above, better than and healthier than men because evolution gave them 90% of everything needed to continue the Human Species well into the future. A little DNA from a man and they are equipped to do almost all the rest. Nature would not have given women these responsibilities if they were not capable of fulfilling them. The problem has always been mens beliefs and desire to dominate everyone around them. The feminist movement brought some of this to the world's attention and has made things better for women in many ways but is it possible that the immediate changes to the relationship between mother and child due to women going to work 2-3 years after childbirth had a negative psychological effect on many children within the last couple of generations? Don't jump to conclusions here because I am NOT trying to blame women's choices to work, get a post secondary education and/or career for the explosion of mental disorders like ADHD, ADD, Depression and others over the last 4-5 decades. The question I am really asking is this...Is it possible and or likely that because children have had their mothers around 24/7 for all of their lives for 99% of our evolution that the almost instantaneous change to being cared for by others so mom can work, starting as young as two years old, be part of the reason so many children (In the west anyway) have developed so many psychological/emotional issues with attention, behaviour and life choices? Could it be that we became so dependant on mom always being available that her absence at an early age causes the symptoms that are diagnosed as ADD, ADHD and the like? Again I am not trying to blame women as a whole for these issues, if anything it would be mens fault for repressing, abusing and traumatizing women for so very long. If you consider humanities long journey through evolution and the idea that we only relatively recently gained the ability to ignore our instincts and make choices for reasons other than survival and the future of our species, it stands to reason that our instincts have been to take the safest road and ignore any selfish desires, how easily we become dependant on things as they are and are famously resistant to change, it is at least possible that early separation from mom for the majority of our time not sleeping could trigger instinctual feelings of anxiety, fear and low self worth. One thing I would like to know is the stats concerning the gender children who present with symptoms of psychological illness early in life. Is it 50/50? Do both boys and girls develop ADD, ADHD etc equally or are the majority of these children male? This is what I suspect because I am a man and admit to being insecure often in my youth. Also it would make sense that females are less often diagnosed with these disorders for several reasons I won't bother mentioning.

Being that once our star begins to run out of Hydrogen the entire solar system will die shortly after, should we not be focusing on finding other, younger systems with planets that can harbour and nurture life as well as faster space travel and most importantly, How to live on a planet without destroying its environment and having a negative effect on all other life forms on it? I realize that we are learning a lot by studying the other planets and moons within our solar system but now that science has proven that the slightest change to one planet or moon will have an effect on everything else, possibly causing changes to our orbit and/or rotation which has been sighted as being the cause of past ice ages and mass extinctions, should we be crashing satellites and probes into them once their fuel runs out? Are we risking our very future by haphazardly dealing with the left overs of our research in the way we always have? Should we be designing our space crafts in such a way that they can return to earth? Is the easiest way the best way ?

Anyone who can separate themselves from personal opinions about the world today and assume a perspective that is all inclusive can see that the world is controlled by the wealthy elite who belong to Zionist groups based in Israel. The USA has become a sword in the hands of the Zionists who hide behind the Jewish culture and exert their will by proxy and believe this keeps their hands clean from the blood that has been spilled in the name of an illegal state spliced on top of Palestine and called Israel. These people state that Israel is the only legal state ever founded because the founding members have law degrees. Most of these peoples degrees were awarded as "Honorary" and it is obvious that these people bent the laws and created new law to meet the needs of their Zionist bosses. They claim antisemitism when they are only one of several Semitic people. Palestinians and Arabs are Semitic and are suffering at the hands of the Zionist groups who are guilty of every charge they accuse others of. Over 2-3 hundred years these people have used resentments and embellished slights of the past to justify and motivate "Jews" all over the world to follow the Talmud, a book written not long ago and meant to be a means of directing Jews to come together in unity against the evil "Goyim", earn money and educate their children as Lawyers, Doctors and Bankers to prepare for the day when they will rule the world. Through manipulative means the wealthiest Zionists in the banking trade have created and implemented a new global economic system that is debt based and controlled by way of The Federal Reserve Banking System that exists in every country with a first world economy. The fed is not owned by the country it is in but is privately owned by the top teer Zionists such as the infamous Rothschilds who became ultra wealthy in the early 19th century. They convinced nations to end the "Gold Standard" banking system that considers a country's tangible wealth when giving loans. With the new system a country can borrow as much as it wants as long as it signs a contract of compound interest and other fees IN PERPETUITY, meaning they pay the debt off FOREVER. This is the motivation behind Feminism. To get as many people working and paying taxes, not to gain equal rights for women. Anyone with a brain can see that throughout the twentieth century things have been manipulated to gain as much power and sympathy as possible so illegal things like the invasion of Palestine would be tolerated. If anyone with a brain and knows basic math were to look at The Holocaust they would instantly notice that gassing and cremating 6 million people in 4-5 years is impossible, even today it takes approximately 40 minutes to cremate one body. Even if it took the same time in the 40's it would take decades to get to 6 million. Do the math yourself and realize that stacking bodies on yop of each other makes the process take longer than one at a time. The Matrix movie is a interpretation of our reality today. We are sources of energy and wealth, nothing more.

verb (used without object),ex·plod·ed, ex·plod·ing. to expand with force and noise because of rapid chemical change or decomposition, as gunpowder or nitroglycerine (opposed to implode).

Then all the info I have found over 20 years based on Einstein's Theory of Relativity and many others in the scientific community are wrong and should stop the use of The Big Bang Theory that literally states "Everything started as a ultra small and dense point that expanded outward in all directions in less than a millisecond". And why did the scientific community recently state that they have observed the Universe still expanding? Physics is physics and when something explodes in a vacuum the energy goes outward in all directions. Regardless I feel that we should be focused on the planet and our behaviour.

Our instincts are fine, remember that Homosexuality is not wrong but sexual immorality is. Our duty is to decide which of our behavior will have a negative effect of the future of Life on this planet. Loving someone does not have to always produce children. There are millions of parentless children that could be raised and loved by a homosexual couple. People have been finding ways of denying and ignoring all kinds of behaviors and the result is always the same. The repression reaches a point where it can no longer be contained and people end up hurt or dead. Instead of maintaining hateful, useless ideals and practices that DO NOT WORK unless a threat of some sort exists in the persons mind or they are convinced what they feel is wrong. Why not investigate the reasons that every single human culture has had homosexuality for thousands of years. Christ said Love God with all your Heart, Mind and Strength & Love others as you Love yourself. There is a distinct difference between Homosexuality and Sexual Immorality which is practiced by more heterosexual people than any other group. When is the last time you heard about a gay rapist compared to how many men are charged and convicted of raping women? BTW This is ethics not Religion

One may safely assume that many human traits are shared by every culture regardless of the state of that culture in the world today. Pride, Insecurity, Fear of Loss, Ego and the dependency that forms when we become accustomed to our individual reality and related goals. I grew up in a middle class environment but my parents owned our home, car and had only bills and property/income tax to pay while each earned between $3000/month (70's) and $4500/month (80's). I had everything within a type of reason that allowed me to get over $1500 worth of stuff at Christmas. I became used to this to the point of taking it for granted and found it hard and uncomfortable after I grew up and left home. I know that if I were to get a degree and earn 100k + a year I would be accustomed to this and want more in no time. If I had a science degree and had years of experience getting grants to do research and becoming famous in the related industries, I would not except discoveries that proved my past published theories incorrect. In fact I would probably work hard to discredit the sources and go into denial because everything I have done since publishing said theory is based on this theory being correct. If Einstein was proven to be incorrect throughout the Theory of Relativity and someone pointed out that he worked reviewing others work and put his theory together using others work, would those who built their career from the assumption that Einstein's theory is absolute truth, be willing to accept the new findings? How many times has pride allowed false beliefs to continue? The flat planet that was created in 7 days smack in the middle of the universe with the sun revolving around us was not that long ago and their are still people who believe these things? Are their a governing body of ethics that all the sciences prescribe to?If not should there be?

Archeology as a whole is my evidence. Carbon dated elements relative to the human species. An explanation that includes ALL of humanity and doesn't depend on theories of Race much less superiority is the most likely explanation. Did you know that most of the worlds petrified wood is in Northern Africa? How about humanoid remains that are the same age and of the oldest discovered remnants of stages of human evolution before Homo Sapiens ?

Supposedly, by using a very powerful electron microscope, pictures of individual atoms have been taken but when they try to look inside the atom nothing makes sense as if the electron and protons were not effected by the laws of physics as we know them. A scientist was heard to say "It's as if the components of the atoms we looked at were everywhere and nowhere simultaneously". They were unable to get a clear picture of what goes on inside individual atoms. A somewhat simular thing is true about our star or any star for that matter. Apparently there are things about the sun that seem to be beyond the Laws of Physics as we understand them. Could it be that our "Reality only exists between the individual atom and an individual star? This would explain the phenomenon of matter. It is said that every atom is 99% empty space yet we have many types of solid matter all around us. Nothing exept mabey air seems to reflect the idea that atoms are 99% empty space.

I recently started a topic called "The Speed of Light" and one of the responces said "You're going to have to unlearn this common misconception if you want to actually understand cosmology. The big bang happened literally everywhere and was never a 'point', and there is no rushing of material from a point into 'empty space' so to speak." So Imust be reading the following wrong... The Big Bang was the moment 13.8 billion years ago when the universe began as a tiny, dense, fireball that exploded. Most astronomers use the Big Bang theory to explain how the universe began. But what caused this explosion in the first place is still a mystery. A sphere exploded but did not expand in every possible direction simultaneously? Is Light not the fastest thing in the Universe? Are you trying to say that Lightspeed is not the fastest speed that anything can travel? Everything I read suggests that the Universe is expanding outward in every possible direction at the same time and began to do this approximately 13.4 Billion years ago

All extinct species except those humanity killed off, experienced an Extinction event. Everything else evolved out of one form into another. All birds are evolved forms of species alive up to about 65 million years ago when everything larger than a large dog died off while those small enough to go under ground evolved into smaller mammals and birds. Homosexuality is only found in species that are environmentally stressed. In primates dominance behavior is mistaken as homosexuality. The only natural phenomenon witnessed is hermaphroditism where species are both sexes or change from one to the other and this is evolution directly related to survival of the species. What "Gay" animals are you referring to?

Does evolution have a direction? Primarily evolution is the development of psychological, physical and spiritual coping mechanisms. For this reply spirituality is defined as positive or negative energy that is created when we think and act. As all actions are born in thought, either conscious or unconscious the two combined sum up the nature of the action and thought that proceeded said action. Observing other life forms and studying the most successful (Ants, termites, bees and hornets) I believe evolution does not have a "Direction" per se but rather a purpose which is to enable life to overcome anything that prevents us from living our full lives and creating offspring to succeed us. It seems that the next phase of evolution for humanity is to come together and focus our energies on a mutually beneficial goal. The most obvious is space travel and the inhabitation of other planets that are conducive to life. We have considered heaven to be up in the sky, our destination if we are "Good" and a paradise that lasts forever. Hell is deep under ground, made of burning sulfur and fire and it is our destination if we are "Bad". In an estimated 4 billion years from now it is said that our star will run out of Hydrogen, Helium and other light elements, begin burning heavier elements and becoming hotter and hotter until it goes Supernova. Long before this our planet will become much too hot for life so between now and then the temperature will slowly rise and our environment will change with it becoming somewhat like Venus. If humanity does not find another planet that is suitable for life, develop a strategy to collect samples of life on earth to transplant on other planets and invent ways and means to travel to said planet with all surviving, our fate is sealed. The only way this is even remotely possible is if Humanity sheds its ignorance and selfishness and begins living like a "Superorganism" like ants and termites. All coming together and focusing our time and energies on a mutually beneficial goal that is broken down into smaller, more manageable goals that are each worked on by subgroups that are educated or familiar with the subjects i.e. Biology, Engineering, etc. This goal and certain sub-goals will span generations so the BIG PICTURE must be the focus. Selfishness and other human traits must be avoided and the TRUTH must be honored. Theories, Beliefs and Concepts like Race and Male Superiority over Woman must be overcome. All evidence suggests that all human beings are more than 99% identical as people develop according to the environment they evolve in. Africans moved from North Africa to the equator and developed darker pigment in their skin to shield them from excess solar radiation. Caucasians moved north and became lighter skinned to allow what little skin was exposed to absorb sunlight needed to process certain vitamins and minerals. Asians went east and lived in a flat frozen area of the earth as an ice age was coming to the end. Asians, Inuit and North American Natives are all of the same group. As time went on and the earth warmed people moved around more freely and began cross breeding and forming most of the other cultures alive today.

In my opinion, humanity has evolved over several millions of years since reaching the mammal stage. As we evolved we developed instincts to guide us and warn us against behaviour that is not conducive to the well being of humanity. This is because same sex couples cannot procreate. While at evolutionary stages where humanity was vulnerable to extinction because our numbers were so low that a plague or natural disaster could wipe our species out our base instincts warned us against any behaviour that didn't contribute to our future. A combination of instinct, pride and ignorance as well as other Psycho/social factors contribute to homophobia. However I believe our history of persecution towards homosexuality mixed with any childhood homosexual experiences kept secret and resulting in personal shame is a major factor. Remember that our morals were dictated by the church and people were killed or imprisoned for homosexual behaviour and until very recently people were persecuted by society if they admitted being homosexual. Homosexuality is different with men than with woman as many women actively choose to be gay as a result of both many generations of trauma,abuse and repression on top of being used as sex objects. Sex has become the most important aspect of mens relationships with woman and it's obvious. I believe homosexuality is nothing to be ashamed of...Nor is it something to be Proud of...It's just sexuality and Pride is as much a factor with homophobia as it is with Racism and supremacy.

I cannot wrap my head around certain aspects of Time, Light Speed and various discoveries said to be "Hundreds of Billions of Light Years away". My first question is...How can scientists detect stars that are more than 13.7 Billion light years away? If the Universe is 13.7 Billion years old, light could not be travelling for more than 13.7 Billion Years as nothing existed before this. In my way of thinking, everything began expanding out from a central point so anything opposite to the earth from the centre is farther than 13.7 Billion light years to a maximum of double the age of the universe or 27.4 Billion Light years. I watched a doc that stated various boundaries that have been discovered. They were said to be Hundreds of Billions of Light Years away. How could anything travel this distance within 13.7 Billion Years?