BAROBA

Hello, Sometime ago I did read somewhere that some liquid caused plastic or rubber to expand to a considerable larger size. But I can't remember where I read it... So does anyone know which liquid ( a solvent ?) this is and what material it causes to expand? Thanks in advance Rob

Think of it as a balloon, if you press hard enough you can make a balloon into a small ball, if you press with unlimited pressure you can compress it into a point that is invisible. But if you release the pressure your balloon will take back it original shape, an object with a normal size. If you blow up this balloon you can see it expanding ( not exploding, it was not an explosion). There was nothing outside of the universe. No empty space, because the empty space is inside of the balloon. So the universe didn't expand into any space, its birth created the space which expanded.

I think so, spin preservation or not, it isn't a basic requirement for my idea. But this theory tries to explain nature as we see it ( only the origin of forces and time-space are different) above this layer everything stays the same. Do you have any hints on how this process ( of decay) can be explaining by using spin? Cheers, Rob

Mine would imply that the photon would decay in quantum-parts. Exactly how is a mystery, but I imagine it would loose energy until a certain point and then would cross a threshold and after that it would decay into another photon an a graviton ( for example). There is another theory ( Supersymmertry?) that implies that protons would decay, so supporters for that theory are also waiting for it to happen. It will happen

Hi Cameron, Are you asking my to explain the (partly) quoted text or why there could be no such force? 1. First the statement is a part of a larger portion of text in which I state that it would NOT be possible to have such a force. I don't like selective quoting, because it distorts what people are saying and can even be used to let them say the opposite of what they ment to say. 2.First of all, the first law of thermodynamics: if the universe has converted all matter into time-time, there is no more energy to that would be able to pull something together. Even gravity would have decayed into time-space. Gravity would be the ideal candidate for such a feat, because it can pull things together over a very long distance. The rubber sheet analogy that Einstein introduced, is good enough to explain deformation of time-space, but that is all. Water would be a better example to describe time-space. Matter can make dents and waves in it. And if matter were like ice-cubes, the volume of water would raise if the icecubes melt/decay. If the bounderies would break around the water, the water would take up a large surface, with no way to 'shrink' back into one point. The law of entropy would forbid it. The same thing goes for the universe. That is just one way of visualizing it' date=' another way is through quantum-field theory. But my idea doesn't go off in higher dimensions ( not yet atleast ) They are both theories to describe the same observations/phenomenons in different ways. Mine is just another way. Cheers, Rob [mp']Consecutive posts merged[/mp] A prediction that comes from my idea: All matter ( even fundamental particles) can seem to exist out over even smaller particles if you collide into it hard enough. The prediction is that that the collision of two particles can releases enough energy that allow heavy particles to exist and decay again into time-space. The shortlived particles can deform time/space in such a way that even fundamental particles seem to break apart. Does anyone ever heard of such a thing? Is it a possibility? Cheers, Rob

The redshift has nothing to do with dark energy. The redshift of a train that moves away from you, doesn't mean that the train is powered by dark energy. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redshift This would require a force that becomes more powerful/attractive as there is less energy available in the universe. This would break the first law of thermodynamics. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_law_of_thermodynamics My universe would die a very cold death and would be many times bigger then now. Think of an ice-cube that is the current universe and a puddle of water as the cold dead universe. And nothing would cause the universe to collapse on itself. Ideas are based on speculations and hunches, and can grow out to become theories (in the scientific sense). Many people had ideas that launches whole new fields of science (and industry) and they virtually contributed nothing to the field they help to create. ( for example Einstein and his explanation of the Brownian Motion and the resulting field of quantum-mechanics that he rejected) I hope to plant a seed that other will work out.. The math that would required for such a task is for beyond mine and presumably a lot of other people. Quantum field theory is barely able to calculate all interactions between 'empty' space and a hydrogen-atom. So the whole universe is a bit of a challenge Which extra volume of space? My idea states that it can explain that the universe continue to accelerate instead of of slowing down or being in a steady state. Nothing more' date=' nothing less. That is basic cosmology. My idea is to explain how the universe looks as it is now. There would indeed be alot more mass present then now. I don't think it would be condensed in the shape of matter. Again, I have no idea how much it would be. Indeed, there is no need for dark energy. Time-space is a field, that can't be detected, but it is a real thing. It's interactions on a Planck length with matter can't be ignored. CMB light is the prove of the interaction between time-space and energy-mass.This is how it looks like I think the view on time-space has evolved a lot further then the simple Euclidean geometry. My idea looks a lot like a string, in the center there is the most amount of energy/mass and gradually towards the ends of the string, you get lesser energy. Draw in one line a lot of waves with high amplitude and short frequency and then gradually drop the amplitude and elongate the frequency until you get a perfectly flat line. This is the half of your string. What you see can look familiar, it looks alot like a string on a music instrument. But the string on a music instrument transmits its energy to the frame and so the string comes back to a rest. My string doesn't transmits its energy onto anything else. The string doesn't transmit its energy to empty space, it is (the transition of mass to) time-space. My string only gets longer as it looses energy, the energy is stored in all the high waves. As matter decays it exchanges energy for length of the string. My idea throws dark energy out of the window, and explains it all with white energy. Occam's razor and all that stuff Love to hear back from you all, Rob

Hello all, My first post here. A long time ago I had an idea, which had a rapid expansion of time-space as a result, and of course back then this was not observed and it looked like my idea was wrong... Ten years later I hear that they found quite the opposite. Time to get that old idea moving again The idea is quite simple: Everything decays. The idea is a continuation of the quantumfield theory, which states that the 'vacuum' of space isn't empty. That is is 'alive' with particle and anti-particle creating and destruction. My idea says that every mass, is in a constant state of exchange with the 'vacuum' of space, and even though the mass seems pretty much contant. On a extreme small scale ( around a Planck-length) you could see that any matter is exchanging particles with the vacuum, and is creating force-particles. ( How exact is still a mystery). The idea its main point is that even forces can decay into the lowest possible energy state, being time-space. All matter has to decay into force-fields( or particles) and they decay into time-space. If you would draw a V on a piece of paper, on the lowest point you would have a mass, the shortest range force particles are also on the bottom of the V.(they exist in the matter). The EM-force fills up to the half of the V. Gravity fills up the rest. This looks pretty similar to Einstein's discription of gravity as a distortion of time-space. What happens with decaying forces? They all decoy into a lower (and further reachng ) force particle, untill they hit the lowest possible energy state. This concept is also very similar to string theory, where each string can have a certain( discreet) amounts of energy. Mass would be be a high-energy string, the force particles each carry less energy untill they reach the lowest possible state, a almost enrgyless string. This would mean that even gravity can create extra time-space on extreme long distances. But because chance and extremely large numbers of gravity particles exist, this expansion of time-space could be witnessed on a much smaller scale. No idea for a experiment though. Also my idea sheds a new light on how the universe started. But that is something for another topic. The end of the universe would be cold, the universe would evaporate into oblivion... Cheers, Rob