Grogingly

Sorry for posting as a new user but just had a question. I have been watching a YouTube channel, Anton Petrov, for a few years now as another source of science news and don't necessarily know how to feel about his content anymore, especially since it has seemed to become more clickbaity. To those who see this post, what is your opinion on using him as a media source? Should add, as a plus side, he does always include a link to the paper he is talking about in the description, which is why I have always kinda trusted his content. If you do not know about Anton Petrov, here is a link to the channel: https://youtube.com/@whatdamath?si=JVFexgtfAOCrRekL

Thanks for the post! I'm new around here (as of like 20 minutes ago) and am striving work in the research field, so seeing stuff about how to pick up on pseudoscience is extremely helpful. About a year or two ago I was trying to get a very baseline understanding of Doppler/Redshift and all of those buzzwords and got sidetracked for like 2 hours on some weird pseudoscience article. Wasn't the best time. Anyways, since it has been a few years since the last post, does anyone have any stories about how noticing pseudoscience (in general) has helped you in your career or endeavors? Would be interested in listening