Jump to content

Imagine Everything

Senior Members
  • Posts

    215
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

Profile Information

  • Interests
    Creating stuff and questioning why things work the way they do in whatever way they do between whoever and whatever they do.
  • College Major/Degree
    None
  • Favorite Area of Science
    Creation
  • Occupation
    Charity volunteer worker

Recent Profile Visitors

1995 profile views

Imagine Everything's Achievements

Atom

Atom (5/13)

22

Reputation

  1. A very clever person once posted this link to me. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Berkeley You might find it interesting. I'm not a believer of nothing though.
  2. Interesting, science might finally have found dark matter or how it was created, did I interpret that right? Also what is Memory Burden please. Not quite sure I could understand the little I found about it. Thx
  3. If it is just the images as you say at the moment then yes. The arrows both have a direction. The second arrow has a (possible) velocity? (at some point it will be moving if let go)
  4. Today I learned that you can wear a canoe on your head. If you turn them over, they are cap sized.
  5. According to cpu68 they did. Not me.
  6. If I may, your god of nothingness created our universe, that implies your god was outside of our universe, even if it's a universe of nothing, meaning there is another universe (of nothing) and wouldn't it follow that your god would also believe in a god that created their universe and therefore couldn't be a god if only one god exists because your gods god would really be your god who created the nothingness universe? ...nth?
  7. Hello world, Hope you're all well. So for the last week or so I have had a possible candidate for my NNP. It fits well within the boundaries of my idea. I suppose I should say that it is probably just one of perhaps (without knowing more) many candidates. Time always tells I suppose. I won't mention it in this post but I am rewriting chapter 1 again and will post in more detail, hopefully with a tiny bit of backing from Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, the Pauli exclusion and at least one other if I understand them correctly or as far I can anyway. Might be more, I don't know. I also have a more fitting name for it too now, though I won't divulge it yet. I also don't know how long it will take to write. I will though and if anyone is still interested then it might at the very least, be an interesting story to help bore you to sleep one night in the future 😴😴😴 And @studiot I think I might actually be able to draw it and possibly able to describe it in a nth vector. I think I have learnt enough to give you at least a very basic vector anyway. It needs a lot of work though so I'm off to do precisely that. Stay safe
  8. My girlfriend told me I was average. She is so mean!
  9. Hope you don't end up shutting this down. It's been really interesting, mind boggling but interesting, fascinating in fact being here. I know a lot more now than I ever would have perhaps, if one of you hadn't said yes to me posting here initially. If I may, from a non scientists/mathematicians point of view, for me even knowing the little I do, seeing an equation, all the different symbols or the way you all speak about things can be quite daunting at times. I have no idea how you might combat this other than being as helpful as you have been. Thank you anyway, just thought I should say something, I appreciate your help.
  10. Should Ax be where Ay is and vice versa? Is this wrong because it's positioning seems to be indicating the vector A and the sub vector x hmm My other thought is perhaps the Ay vector/sub vector should be above the x axis label. I wonder this because the y sub vector appears to represent the left of the right angle. adjacent is that right? I'm not up to speed on sohcahtoa yet. Bit tired now, maths is draining lol, I'm erring more toward the second answer.
  11. My mind won't stop whirring as it were and I think consciousness was perhaps the wrong word to use in this respect, I'm still learning all the time and though I can't perhaps see or say the right words, I can see what I mean and will hopefully explain it better with more knowledge. Trying to say this is a short way is tremendously difficult for me, hence all my weird and wonderful questions. However, I think I have gained enough insight to perhaps offer an explanation of what I think this 'Nameless Non Particle' might be. I asked about how how data is stored by the brain because this 'NNP' is (within) this idea, something that exists as a part of or created by us and everything else in the universe. Yeah I know, big statement, I apologise for it sounding that way and I don't blame anyone who might be reading this for thinking I might be too creative in thinking like this, to put it mildly. Here goes nothing lol, I speak English and when I think of a sheep for example, I see a sheep. If I spoke Turkish, the word would be different but still present itself as a sheep image, if I spoke German, again the word might be different but the image would still be of a sheep. So on and so forth with all languages spoken now or since sheep were known to humankind. I could have used anything for an example, sheep themselves are not particularly important. Unless you're a sheep lol. Delving deeper then, so I'm trying to understand how this image is stored, or more to the point, what is it stored as? I asked if it was binary because from what I know, binary is the fundamental breakdown of things? Please tell me if that's wrong. I know that I don't know enough about certain things to make a complete and definitive explanation. Even if this image is stored within neurons, doesn't it mean that this image is stored as 'something' inside the neuron? Like (if I may) data within files in a hard drive). I use that terminology loosely). So, at some point is an idea/image/information really just 'something' in it's own right? Being stored somehow inside something? Waiting to be used or created? Humans have been, seem to and perhaps always will follow the predetermined probability of randomness? We (and I don't know everyone, so this is an assumption to some extent) seem to behave randomly, randomly but through the whole spectrum of randomness. From the very evil all the way through to the very kind. From the very un-knowledgeable to the very knowledgeable? So on and so forth. And as we are all made from the fabric of energy and fields/particles seem to behave is an expanentially random way. Nature following nature if you will. How many time shave I heard people saying, we are what we are made of. Maybe this is more true/deeper than I have envisioned before. Maybe this is why people on a whole behave the way we all can and do with all the contradictions that come with it. Good can be bad, bad can be good....evolution seems to perhaps be the answer rather than randomness. Maybe I'm way off, maybe my thinking will change as I learn more. I don't know tbh. So finally lol, if this 'sheep' memory is stored as a' something' in our brains that isn't physical, I see the space in our universe and everywhere if I'm honest as following this route. Nature following nature. Maybe I could zoom out and ask you folks the question regarding planets, nebluae, BH?, stars, galaxies? is this also analogous to the way QM happens, as humans behave? Predetermined Probability of Randomness. Chaotic order? Ordered chaos? Everything has to start from the very small to become as big as it might get? And regarding DM, I see it in this idea as the same as stored memory. In fact I see it as stored memory if nothing can't truly be 'nothing' If things destroyed by a BH leave behind the information of their existence in someway shape or form, Quantum Hair?. This is what I see as a Nameless Non Particle in this idea. A memory of what was once whatever it was. A sheep doesn't reside in our brain, it is an image. Could DM or however it might actually be called, merely be a memory or a blank memory waiting to be created by whatever requires it to form that creation. I'm going to say what has probably been looked at by all you clever folks before (and from I've seen/read, you folks seem to have literally been everywhere which I'm still amazed at) just because I don't have a better way of explaining it right now, the dark sub atomic tree?. So for every possible particle that exists, can they create a shadow of themselves through their creation and or decay. Dark bosuns, protons, quarks etc though I don't envision them as particles, more like shadows/echoes/memories of what they once were or a part of.Perhaps memory might be the best term. I don't know. Perhaps not electrons as I read they live for 15 quintillion years x 14b years. But hmm what do I know. My thoughts may still change as my knowledge grows, even if this is true, I might be wrong about the way they're created, I just don't know tbh. As always I appreciate any feedback one way or the other.
  12. I gave you a +1 because it made me groan and slap my head.
  13. I have, what might seem like a weird question, I do have my own explanation for thinking this which is also related to this thread but I need to ask please. Has science ever considered or tried to mathematically understand consciousness as or similar to 'dark matter'/space? And perhaps a less strange question if I may, what exactly is memory stored as? As in, after we have created synaptic pathways and stored it etc, what is it stored as fundamentally? Binary code?
  14. Few jokes for the weekend Why can’t you trust an atom? Because they make up everything! Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field! Did you know that Diarrhea is hereditary? It runs in the jeans (genes)
  15. Thank you Studiot. I look forward to your next post and appreciate your belief in me. +good karma to you.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.