BlueCollarConcept

I couldn't find one. The link you provided is not Plate tectonics theory its a wikipedia page about it

Hello Zapatos Off course. I used some images from there. That is a Wikipedia page about Plate tectonics

it is important. Plate tectonics would be impossible otherwise From what I can tell, many forum members are up in arms because they perceive this post as some sort of Plate Tectonics denial. That's not the case. Plate tectonics are real and they work. But they work for the oceanic crust only. That's because oceanic and continental crusts are separate layers of lithosphere, they are very different in many ways and in my video I try to explain how that happened.

Hello TheVat and Exchemist Images you provide are small and separate segments of the theory, which is something I emphasize in my video. Problem is they don't work as a whole. Lets put it this way, if one was to pay an engineer to model this mechanism as whole, he could not do it. and He could not do it because the main condition would be to conform to the laws of physics

Hello Studiot nothing really "complicated" about it Look at it this way; A sphere is broken up into 15 pieces, all you have to do is to show how they are moving relative to each other. And I mean all of them Again, people can 3d model extremely complex mechanisms. This should be a piece of cake There are thousands upon thousands of geologists and its been a century, yet they can not produce this

Hello Exchemist "there is no theory" means I couldn't find one If there was one I assume someone should be able to provide a link to it .Yes, there are bits and pieces all over the place but they are for the most part useless and even contradictory to each other. Lets put it this way, if you wanted to review the Plate tectonics theory, how would you do it? If you noticed, even here in fringe science and speculation forum there are certain standards that should be met. Moderator immediately reminded that one should be able to describe what one is trying to say. Others shouldn't have to go different places to try and figure it out. So how about actual scientists?- should there not be a comprehensive description of their theory?

Hello Swansont. Yes, the rule is well understood and no intention to spam the thread here. However, the post relies heavily on 3d modeling ( visualizing ) and would be otherwise incomplete and difficult to explain in words

Hello everyone. It has been more than a century since the foundations of the Plate Tectonics theory were laid. Yet, to this day, there is no all inclusive model of it. These days, even enthusiast can produce computer generated models of highly complex mechanisms. Car engines, Jet engines, Turbines and prototypes of any kind. So why is it that no one can produce 3d model of the Plate Tectonics mechanism? If you tried to make one you would immediately run into a very unexpected problem - There is no theory! As i understand, there is a certain limit to file size i can upload here. for that reason only and with your permission i will provide the link to a youtube video where I try to explain the problems with Plate Tectonics and possible solutions. I invite you to share your thoughts. url removed