NobelPrizeLaureate

ok, arent facial expressions inhereted?

whats moronic about my question? you mean facial expressions are not unique to ethnic groups? OK, most white people have the same vibe... like ok, 'thats an american' vs 'thats a swede' vs 'thats a dutch person' can you not tell from the vibe? facial expressions etc well, go on, tell me what you think of my genetic compostion

I meant 'the world ranking system, by gad, old fashioned way of expotulating, like 'the world ranking system, by jove, or 'by heaven' or 'oh my god, the world ranking system...this one in fact (fig 1) OK, so 335 million americans can accomplish in terms of world ranking, whatever that quantifies; what it takes a billion chinese people to do; so.... 1 American 3.5 chinese people The other facts provide a starker example the population of India vs Arabian DNA... mind boggling food for thought

I was recently thinking about this and that, and I stumbled upon a monumental discovery THE WORLD RANK SYSTEM, BY GAD USA at world #1: Population: 100 million people It takes ONE BILLION CHINESE PEOPLE TO ACHIEVE THE SAME WORLD RANK Does that mean that in terms of manpower; One billion Chinesemen can accomplish what it takes just 100 million white people to accomplish... Meanings one white person = 10 Chinesemen? At the world #10 position... INDIA AND ISRAEL AND UAE AND SAUDI ARABIA TIE FOR 10TH PLACE (Israel, Saudis...same DNA more or less) One billion Indians = 10 million Saudis/Jews, all three middle eastern countries have the SAME POPULATION AND THE SAME WORLD RANK It can't be a coincidence.... ONE JEW/SAUDI= 100 INDIANS

OK so I'm part Irish part Asian This is a photo of me. Can you determine my Irish and Asian DNA composition by weighing in the following inhereted traits... Irish facial features And even expression... Like I have a British sorta kinda vibe like Emma Watson, I'm not making a funny, like....things like facial expressions, can they not be inhereted? Like the Emma Watson vibe vs the Priyanka Chopra vibe....

Eureka, Eureka, says I. I've proved INFINITY! In my opinion, the concept of a mathematical constant that goes beyond the boundaries of space, has something else going for it. How can a number exist that has no volume, no quantity... Infinity, bah humbug. Nay not so. Infinity is basically a number with an underlying TIME factor to it. It's space multiplied by time Infinity is not 'contained into one digit' it's 'the progression of digits continually. That alleviates infinity from a 2D number to a 3D number. We are talking about X Y and Z graphs here.

Don't you reckon it's a great idea to train people to vaccinate each other in public? Like, the process of administering an injection is very simple, I've seen tutorials on youtube, like a 4 step process. If everybody in the world were trained to administer flu shots, or tetanus shots, for instance There could be random booths put up all over the place, one could just walk upto a person on the street and be like "Wanna give me my flu injection" Just an idea I had wanted to share.

He didn't SPECIFICALLY tell them not to 'do', but THAT WAS THE OUTCOME OF HIS SPEECHES. Like....when you play chess, you don't immediately checkmate, you play the pawn to e4. But checkmate is the goal. OK think about it....if he had gone about telling peolpe directly 'dont have sex' they would have thought he was just a hater and ignored him. He allowed THEM to do the math. He dug deep into their psychology and showed em, pros and cons of not having sex. Like....in the end, the plan was so brilliant they just 'didnt have sex' it came FROM WITHIN. The lifestyles, the destructive behaviours, telling em all that was part of the masterplan to prevent Jews breeding

No, I am not assuming anything of the sort....where does it say in my post that I do? Yes, that's precisely how Paul would have done it, to wrap the sentiment of celibacy in a profound sounding scripture and then thrust it upon the flock. He was using his vantage point of authority as a priest to push the propoganda....like if he was going to do it, that's how he would have gone about telling people not to have sex. It might be a conspiracy theory, but it's supported by enough facts, like, were the romans in favour of euthanising Jews, or not? The Paul Technique could have been a brainchild of Ceaser, he was a mastermind.

Many reasons.... 1. Being a preist he could no longer enjoy Roman Harems, and the thorn in the flesh was his envy at people who did, like he wanted to stop everybody else from indulging in the vice of sex, also. 2.From another perspective maybe he was in the pay of Caeser, like it was part of a Roman mission to stop Jews overpopulating like Hitler etc etc

It was staring us in the face all along, since Galileo's days, folks. WHAT ARE THE CHANCES. THE STATISTICAL PROBABILITY. THAT. The sun and the moon, when viewed from earth, appear to the human eye, EXACTLY THE SAME SIZE.....DESPITE BEING OF DIFFERENT SIZES AND DISTANCES FROM THE EARTH? Like....what natural law in the Grand Scheme of things, mandated that 'the sun and the moon must necessarily appear the same size, down to a pixel, to the human eye, when viewed from earth'? Is there such a law in the science journals? Would be funny if there was. You see what I mean? Why are the sun and the moon apparantly the same size? BECAUSE THEY ARE.... THATS NOT THE 'SUN' AND THE 'MOON... THATS PARALLEL BLINKIN DIMENSIONS, EARTH, IN PARALLEL DIMENSIONS....

You know that Dinosaur theory, "There were once massive prehistoric lizards called dinosaurs, they found the blighters bones buried under the soil in 1950..yes, bones, 150 feet long....enough to finish off the fossil fuel crisis"... Bonkers, I say, bonkers. THE GEOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE BEGS TO DIFFER. According to the big bang theory, THE PLANET HAS BEEN EXPANDING SINCE THE DAYS OF THE BIG BANG. Inverse logic: In the Triassic/Jurrasic era, when the Park were in place, THIS PLANET WAS THE SIZE OF A TENNIS BALL. So...if something died in 1627351235576 BC, then the fossilized bones of that specimen, would have EXPANDED WITH THE EXPANDING UNIVERSE. You see what I mean? 1000000000 BC: A human being, or a dog, for Gods sakes, dies, on planet earth. Fast forward to 1930 when archeologists stumble across those bones. How is it that those bones are so huge? Well, they EXPANDED ALONG WITH THE EXPANDING UNIVERSE. No, those were not GIANT bones when they were buried in the Triassic Era. They were normal sized bones. The dogs of the Triassic era were like dalmations, alsations, normal cute cuddly ones like they are today. They expanded with the rate of expansion of the universe. So if THE BIG BANG THEORY AND THE RATE OF EXPANSION OF THE UNIVERSE THEORY WERE THROWN OUT OF THE WINDOW, THEN AND ONLY THEN.... Would the 'Dinosaur theory' (massive prehistoric lizards, 1000 feet long, theory) make sense In short, the Dinosaur theory doesnt take into account the rate of expansion of the universe..... Up for debate