NobelPrizeLaureate

Don't you reckon it's a great idea to train people to vaccinate each other in public? Like, the process of administering an injection is very simple, I've seen tutorials on youtube, like a 4 step process. If everybody in the world were trained to administer flu shots, or tetanus shots, for instance There could be random booths put up all over the place, one could just walk upto a person on the street and be like "Wanna give me my flu injection" Just an idea I had wanted to share.

He didn't SPECIFICALLY tell them not to 'do', but THAT WAS THE OUTCOME OF HIS SPEECHES. Like....when you play chess, you don't immediately checkmate, you play the pawn to e4. But checkmate is the goal. OK think about it....if he had gone about telling peolpe directly 'dont have sex' they would have thought he was just a hater and ignored him. He allowed THEM to do the math. He dug deep into their psychology and showed em, pros and cons of not having sex. Like....in the end, the plan was so brilliant they just 'didnt have sex' it came FROM WITHIN. The lifestyles, the destructive behaviours, telling em all that was part of the masterplan to prevent Jews breeding

No, I am not assuming anything of the sort....where does it say in my post that I do? Yes, that's precisely how Paul would have done it, to wrap the sentiment of celibacy in a profound sounding scripture and then thrust it upon the flock. He was using his vantage point of authority as a priest to push the propoganda....like if he was going to do it, that's how he would have gone about telling people not to have sex. It might be a conspiracy theory, but it's supported by enough facts, like, were the romans in favour of euthanising Jews, or not? The Paul Technique could have been a brainchild of Ceaser, he was a mastermind.

Many reasons.... 1. Being a preist he could no longer enjoy Roman Harems, and the thorn in the flesh was his envy at people who did, like he wanted to stop everybody else from indulging in the vice of sex, also. 2.From another perspective maybe he was in the pay of Caeser, like it was part of a Roman mission to stop Jews overpopulating like Hitler etc etc

It was staring us in the face all along, since Galileo's days, folks. WHAT ARE THE CHANCES. THE STATISTICAL PROBABILITY. THAT. The sun and the moon, when viewed from earth, appear to the human eye, EXACTLY THE SAME SIZE.....DESPITE BEING OF DIFFERENT SIZES AND DISTANCES FROM THE EARTH? Like....what natural law in the Grand Scheme of things, mandated that 'the sun and the moon must necessarily appear the same size, down to a pixel, to the human eye, when viewed from earth'? Is there such a law in the science journals? Would be funny if there was. You see what I mean? Why are the sun and the moon apparantly the same size? BECAUSE THEY ARE.... THATS NOT THE 'SUN' AND THE 'MOON... THATS PARALLEL BLINKIN DIMENSIONS, EARTH, IN PARALLEL DIMENSIONS....

You know that Dinosaur theory, "There were once massive prehistoric lizards called dinosaurs, they found the blighters bones buried under the soil in 1950..yes, bones, 150 feet long....enough to finish off the fossil fuel crisis"... Bonkers, I say, bonkers. THE GEOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE BEGS TO DIFFER. According to the big bang theory, THE PLANET HAS BEEN EXPANDING SINCE THE DAYS OF THE BIG BANG. Inverse logic: In the Triassic/Jurrasic era, when the Park were in place, THIS PLANET WAS THE SIZE OF A TENNIS BALL. So...if something died in 1627351235576 BC, then the fossilized bones of that specimen, would have EXPANDED WITH THE EXPANDING UNIVERSE. You see what I mean? 1000000000 BC: A human being, or a dog, for Gods sakes, dies, on planet earth. Fast forward to 1930 when archeologists stumble across those bones. How is it that those bones are so huge? Well, they EXPANDED ALONG WITH THE EXPANDING UNIVERSE. No, those were not GIANT bones when they were buried in the Triassic Era. They were normal sized bones. The dogs of the Triassic era were like dalmations, alsations, normal cute cuddly ones like they are today. They expanded with the rate of expansion of the universe. So if THE BIG BANG THEORY AND THE RATE OF EXPANSION OF THE UNIVERSE THEORY WERE THROWN OUT OF THE WINDOW, THEN AND ONLY THEN.... Would the 'Dinosaur theory' (massive prehistoric lizards, 1000 feet long, theory) make sense In short, the Dinosaur theory doesnt take into account the rate of expansion of the universe..... Up for debate