Richard West

Oh, i see.. hmmm, well, in that case i'm gonna have to re-examine it a bit more, thanks for the heads up =/

Well, I can try to explain it all, but for now (as I don't have my laptop with me at this current moment) I can briefly mention the fact that yes, GR does predict that beyond the event horizon it must be geodesically incomplete, and it is.. in 3+1 Dimensions (assuming you consider spacetime as a 4 dimensional concept where 'time' is the 4th dimension..) because 'geometrically' space is 3d.. however a hypersphere, caused by GR's prediction of bent spacetime due to a mass, which we then call 'gravity', bends 'into itself' causing a '4d hyperspherical structure to form, encasing the mass of the collapsed star', and so as it is a 4d shape, it would have a 3d surface, (just as a 3d shape has a 2d surface, and a 2d shape, would have a 1d surface(or edge)), and so from 3+1 dimensions (or 3d spacetime), beyond the event horizon would appear geodesically incomplete, as predicted by GR, but from 4+1 dimensions (or 4d spacetime), it would form a 'loop' around the 4d hyperspherical structure, around its '3d surface'.. As for the pre-existance of higher spatial dimensions, yes theoretically they could exists, even though we cannot 'directly see' them, as we are 3dimensional creatures, who can only truly comprehend up to 3 spatial dimensions.. but the 4d structure formed during the gravitational collapse results from the curvature of spacetime 'not just bending down into a sort of 'hole', but rather, being curved 'around' the 'center' of the mass itself, until it reaches a point when spacetime 'curves back into itself', forming a higher dimensional structure (as we and most-all objects exist in 3 spatial dimensions, this structure would then theoretically exist within 4 spatial dimensions, or 4d) which based on it 'curving around' the 'center' of mass, as it becomes ever-more 'densly compacted', it would form a sort of 'higher dimensional sphere', or a 'hypersphere'.. As for the Mathematics of the Theory, yes, I admit, I am still in the proces of refining it further and translating it into mathematics that make sense, but so far, although it has been (and still is) quite a lengthy process, I haven't run into any real 'dead-end problems as of yet', and so once I have some of the equations ready for 'peer review', I will happily provide them here. But in the meantime, please also feel free to request for me to 'focus' upon any particular Mathematical aspect of the theory, as, once again, I really just want to share this theory with the world in the best, and most logical and reasonable sense possible (Is it appropriate for me to keep repeating that, or is that point already been made??)

Here's a thought in favour of the idea that hawking radiation theoretically results from particle-antiparticle pairs forming near the event horizon, but one particle 'falls into' the black hole, while the other escapes: It would make sense, when you consider that the particle that falls in, MUST annihilate with another particle, and so when it falls in to the black hole, it annihilates with a particle that's already part of the black hole's mass, which would also explain why hawking radiation appears to 'very gradually reduce' a black hole's mass over time, as for the particle that escapes, it would continue out into space just fine, as two particles were created, and when the one fell into the black hole and annihilated with a particle already part of the black hole's mass, two particles were annihilated, and therefore total mass (and energy) is conserved..

How do Nebulae Form?

okay sure, I could do that Abstract: The Gravitational-Bubble Theory presents a groundbreaking redefinition of black hole mechanics. It posits that black holes do not collapse into infinitely dense singularities, but instead, spacetime curves into a 4D hypersphere at the black hole's core, called a gravitational bubble. This hypothesis eliminates the problematic notion of infinite density while maintaining consistency with both general relativity and quantum mechanics. The event horizon, traditionally seen as a boundary beyond which no information escapes, is reinterpreted as the 3D shadow of the 4D hypersphere. By incorporating exotic matter and energy into the theory, the Gravitational-Bubble Theory offers new insights into quantum gravity, black hole thermodynamics, and cosmic evolution.

sure thing, thanks for the note, I'm still new to this whole forum thing. Just to clarify, how exactly am I expected to post it? because this theory is something I would really like to share with the world, in an acceptable way..

This Theory (link removed), is one I have devised which could possibly help to better explain the geometry and behaviour of Black Holes, as well as also acting as the potential bridge we have all been looking for which finally relates Quantum Mechanics with Relativity.. But of course, it is 'Mostly' Theoretical, and although it aligns with most-all of the widely 'proven'/'accepted' theories and laws in physics as of yet, it still requires your willingness to 'consider' its plausibility (i.e. open your mind to 'new' ideas, and not limit it to 'current beliefs')..