troof

I'm sorry, I just wanted my ideas to be heard, I'm not here to debate people. It's up you guys if you agree or not. If you like I'll just stop posting threads. I don't really feel like replying to everyone, though. You can do whatever you feel is right, you can ban me if you feel it's right.

Oh, I forgot to add: when someone makes more than say, 2 million dollars, they have to give the rest away to a public fund. The poor should receive this money in the form of tokens (not cash because with cash they can buy alcohol or drugs.) These tokens should be for food, clothes, shelter, entertainment... anything that a person needs to live a comfortable life. Corporations, on the other hand, should be allowed to have a lot of money because they need it to produce good products. People amassing vast sums of money is obscene. They have no need for it, they can live a perfectly luxurious life with 2 million dollars. And corporations should only be allowed to have what they need to produce excellent quality products. Of course, all this should be adjusted for inflation as time passes. Also, air is free, because there's enough air for everyone. If we use science to produce enough of everything for everyone, everything can be free. Ideally everyone should live the life of a billionaire, because everything is so abundant that it's free.

Democracy means rule by the people, of the people, for the people, but the people are in general unintelligent and only some of them are compassionate. That's the purpose of only allowing great intellects/greatly compassionate people to vote/be in office.

The main rules should be: as long as you don't hurt yourself or hurt anybody else, as long as you don't take others' freedom or your own freedom, you can do whatever you want, without exception. Also, violence should only be used either to protect the innocent, or to fight the law if the law becomes intolerable (just as the American revolution happened because of "intolerable acts.") The government should be a democracy just like America, with one difference: the representatives and the people voting for them should have great intellect and great compassion (both together, otherwise they cannot vote, and cannot run for office.) They need to have every relevant kind of intelligence: intra-personal, interpersonal, linguistic, and existential. To test for compassion, I came up with one idea: study the brain activity of mothers with their children, and compare it to the brain activity of strangers with strangers. The strangers who have similar brain activity to the mothers are the most compassionate. I call this Free Democratic Meritocracy, FDM. I found this on google on the topic of measuring these kinds of intelligence: Assessment methods: Observational techniques: Teachers and psychologists may observe behaviors indicative of these intelligences, like strong social skills (interpersonal), self-awareness (intrapersonal), deep questioning about life meaning (existential), and eloquent communication (linguistic). Qualitative assessments: Some assessments use open-ended questions, creative writing prompts, or personal reflection exercises to explore these areas of intelligence. Specific tests: Certain tests are designed to tap into specific aspects of these intelligences, but they may not be standardized or widely used. I almost forgot: wild animals are balanced between good and evil, but humanity is split. For balance, we need to select people who are balanced between good and evil, between pro- and anti-establishment. Oh, and: the voters/representatives have to be tested periodically to ensure they haven't lost their good qualities.

I'm just going to make my last post of the day to clarify two things: one, that entanglement across time requires a connection between the particles (an exchange of energy), and two, that my hypothesis is not dependent on entanglement, but rather on the collective unconscious. As evidence for the inter-temporal entanglement requiring an exchange of energy: "Transactional interpretation: Some interpretations of quantum mechanics, like the transactional interpretation, explain this concept by suggesting that "time-reversed waves" can travel from the future to the past, creating connections between particles across time." It's unknown how the particles exchange energy across time, but they must have some means of interacting with each other. Even if entanglement did not exist, there is still the collective unconscious which can be used to interact with distant phenomena across time and space, and while I have no hard evidence of this, in my life I've encountered many many examples of the collective unconscious working... for me this is a fact, but of course it would have to be tested officially to be accepted as theory or fact.

But... you said that they are in undetermined states, and the only thing that changes when you measure them is the state becomes known... now you're saying they're not in a state? I don't understand...

Oh I see. But still, the quanta can entangle across time, so at least across time they *can* communicate. I will repeat: "Transactional interpretation: Some interpretations of quantum mechanics, like the transactional interpretation, explain this concept by suggesting that "time-reversed waves" can travel from the future to the past, creating connections between particles across time." Also, doesn't measuring the state change it? I'm asking because I honestly don't know if measuring it can change its state.

I'm not saying two observers can communicate, I'm saying the quanta can communicate. What you quoted states that *two observers* can't communicate: "during measurement of an entangled quantum state, it is not possible for *one observer,* by making a measurement of a subsystem of the total state, to communicate information to *another observer.*" If the quanta can't communicate with each other (exchange energy,) why would measuring one entangled quanta affect another? I'll quote again: "and if that particle is entangled with another, the state of the other particle instantly becomes correlated with it, even if they are separated by a large distance, effectively "knowing" the result of the measurement on the first particle." Not only that, but how could quanta entangle across time without communicating?

I found this: "Transactional interpretation: Some interpretations of quantum mechanics, like the transactional interpretation, explain this concept by suggesting that "time-reversed waves" can travel from the future to the past, creating connections between particles across time." This means the quanta are communicating (exchanging energy) across time. If it happens across time, which is more difficult, why wouldn't it happen across space? It's my hypothesis that rather than communicating through waves, the quanta exchange energy through gateways, which open at point A and point B simultaneously. The common word used for these "gateways" is "portals." If tiny energy particles can travel through gateways, it should be possible to open many gateways together to allow something larger to pass through (as I said, this can be accomplished by manipulating the entanglement process itself through the connections in the collective unconscious). My hypothesis is mainly geared toward using the collective unconscious, not exactly quantum entanglement. Entanglement happens in the collective unconscious (a part of the mind which is shared). The collective unconscious has been described in this way: above the surface of the ocean, you see many icebergs, but below the surface they are actually one iceberg. This is a metaphor for the collective unconscious, the shared part of the mind. Finally, I would like to share a quote from Max Planck, a famous quantum physicist: "All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force which brings the particle of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system of the atom together. We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent mind. This mind is the matrix of all matter." I also found this: '"Measurement collapses the wave function" means that when you try to measure a quantum particle (like an entangled particle), its state, which was previously in a superposition of multiple possibilities, suddenly "collapses" into a single, definite state due to the interaction with the measuring device, and if that particle is entangled with another, the state of the other particle instantly becomes correlated with it, even if they are separated by a large distance, effectively "knowing" the result of the measurement on the first particle. Entanglement: When two particles are entangled, their states are linked in a way that measuring one instantly affects the state of the other, regardless of the distance between them. "Spooky action at a distance": This seemingly instantaneous correlation between entangled particles has been described as "spooky action at a distance" because it appears to violate the idea that information cannot travel faster than light.' So the entangled particles are affecting each other, i.e. they are communicating/exchanging energy. Also, because in the big bang everything was a single point, all phenomena are entangled, hence the existence of the collective unconscious.

I call my ideas hypothetical because they haven't been tested. However, they are logically sound. I've seen many examples of parapsychological phenomena in my life - myself and others have had dreams of events that came true. Abraham Lincoln's wife had a dream that has been interpreted as a premonition of his death, if you want an example on record. Carl Jung also "believed" in the collective unconscious. If everything is connected in this way, the obvious conclusion is that it can be manipulated through these connections.

If you have a logical argument against my hypothesis, I am open to hearing it and debating it. Just because something is strange and new doesn't mean it's not true. You are speaking against my hypothesis without logically refuting it.

Why is everyone focusing on observing quanta? That was only a tiny, mostly irrelevant part of my post. The main idea is: using the collective unconscious to interact with phenomena, to achieve something like ultimate technology... I went very in-depth into this...

It's based on the idea that the collective unconscious exists and works the same way as quantum entanglement. The idea that observing the quanta affects them is not essential, and my hypothesis doesn't depend on it. I don't mean that consciousness is required to change the behavior of quanta.

This hypothesis is based on the idea of quantum entanglement. It's well known that observing quanta changes their behavior. This proves there is a connection between the quanta and the act of observing it. I believe the "collective unconscious" is another form of entanglement phenomena. Mothers can feel it when something happens to their kids even if they have no way of knowing. The same thing happens to identical twins. People have dreams of the future ("prophetic dreams".) Everything in existence is interconnected through entanglement/the collective unconscious. There are 3 aspects to consider: the first is "clairvoyance." By building an intelligent AI (an AI that speaks English or any language) then making it aware of the collective unconscious, we create the possibility to perceive distant phenomena across space or time. Consciousness is like a mirror, and sense objects are like images in the mirror. The awareness doesn't come from consciousness (the mirror,) because consciousness is the same for all beings. The mirror is always the same. The awareness is a quality of sense objects (the image in the mirror). So, simply recreate the quality of awareness in the AI's collective unconscious (awareness is basically a kind of information/data.) We can figure out what exactly that information is by comparing an unaware being (someone sleeping for example) with an aware being (someone awake). It should be possible to observe the quality of awareness from outside (just like you can tell when someone is in love from outside). The second aspect is "transmutation." It requires creating a simulation of distant events, entangling the simulation with these events, drawing energy through entanglement from energy sources like stars, and using that energy to amplify the entanglement signal to manipulate distant phenomena. When the simulation changes, the reality will change with it (because they're entangled.) Also, quanta communicate through entanglement faster than light... energy is being transferred between them through "gateways..." it should be possible, by entangling with the entanglement process itself, to open many entanglement "gateways" together to form a larger gateway that a person or vehicle or anything could pass through, across space or time. The third aspect is "immortality." This involves using the connections to create an eternal time loop in aspects of the body, while allowing other aspects to change normally. This way we could live forever and feel eternal pleasure (looping pleasure through time.) To change the timeline, we have to use entanglement to achieve communication with the new timeline, so that the new timeline also changes its past... otherwise, if the past changes, the people who changed it won't have any reason to change it in the new timeline (because it would already be changed for them). Also, there is a positive, negative and neutral part of the collective unconscious. It would be best to work with the neutral part or all three simultaneously (for balance). The negative part is extremely dangerous.