Traveling_Templar

I'm going to write a paper on it explaining it indepth. Later, i'll show you once it's done. It'll get off of the ground. Trust me.

I too am suggestting that these extremophiles fed off of the existing matter. Do you disagree with it? Or can you not understand? If it's the former, Well sorry. If it's the ladder, let me oversimplify it without trying to lose extreme vital information. Premise 1: The general premise of it is that, the universe is infinite, life has always been and always will be, the universe forms off of the heat of life; once all time of the universe runs out and most of the stars are dead and many of the galaxies are dead, etc, only extremophiles, and existing matter and energy remain. If all microbial lifeforms do all die out, they are created through matter, and then feed off of it as a source of energy to get it, causing them to emit heat in such a large area that, the cold universe, not knowing what to do with this heat essentially, causes an explosion essentially, eg; the big bang. Hope you understand now, agreeing with it is up to you, and I respect if you do or don't.

I got the name wrong. Poincaré recurrence theorem. That's the correct one. True, however, this theory proposes that the production of life happens overtime. For example, let's say this is true and there was a universe before. The surplus and or creation of life through existing matter indicates that (because some extremophiles can) emitted such a mass in a large area that it caused significant heat through body heat. However, the stars have died out, and cannot reproduce like lifeforms. Well secondly, this is going off of the assumption that the lifeforms produced at such a rate that it outpaced the destruction at which it was made. Although it does sound a bit ridiculous, assume there were tardigrades that reproduced at that crazy rate and quickly. Not impossible, given enough time. Thirdly, this is also going off of the theory that there has always been (the universe) and many big bangs have happened and always happened due to this process, and that life is a biproduct of the universe and that matter ( non living matter ) can create living organisms, see the mention of the Miller-Urey experiment.

Counter Argument 1: This theory is based off of the The quantum eternity theorem. This goes off of the predispisition, that since energy is eternal, it would either preserve/ and or create life through existing matter, Eg; the Miller-Urey experiment. Need to go to school, so i'll fully reply to these later.

Here’s a speculative theory combining the Miller-Urey experiment, life, and the Big Bang: Imagine the primordial conditions simulated in the Miller-Urey experiment not just as the origin of life on Earth, but as a microcosmic event that could exist universally. In this view, primordial systems like Earth's prebiotic soup might arise throughout the cosmos, forming basic organic compounds. Now, consider that once these systems evolve into lifeforms, they release energy as heat—a byproduct of metabolism. If such life proliferated on a universal scale, the cumulative heat energy could potentially interact with the surrounding universe. Over eons, this heat might act as a catalyst for cosmic-scale reactions. The speculative leap is that this accumulated energy might reach a critical point, triggering a universal reaction akin to a chain explosion—the Big Bang. Essentially, life might have created feedback loops of energy intense enough to destabilize the fabric of pre-existing conditions, leading to an expansion event. This theory reimagines the Big Bang not as a singular, uncaused event, but as the product of life-driven processes, merging the origins of biology and the cosmos into one interconnected phenomenon. It’s a stretch, but such ideas push the boundaries of how we think about existence. Here’s the speculative theory in syllogistic form: Premise 1: The Miller-Urey experiment demonstrates that organic molecules, the precursors of life, can form spontaneously under specific conditions. Premise 2: Lifeforms produce heat energy as a byproduct of metabolism. Premise 3: If life exists universally and on a massive scale, the cumulative heat energy could interact with the cosmos, causing significant reactions. Premise 4: The universe's conditions might reach a tipping point where accumulated life-driven heat energy triggers a cosmic expansion. Conclusion: Therefore, the existence of widespread life might have catalyzed the Big Bang, creating the universe as we know it. Although, i'm aware it's a stretch, I simply love theorizing about the creation of the universe, if there's any problems, let me know. I'll post a follow up to the theory soon. -Gavin H. And no, i'm not an AI, I just type like one.