Bishadi

the dahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh is the comment you made................ it is 'pulsating' magnetic fields that can be used on the brain and affects noted as a 3 tesla magnet can pick up your car

i agree words are what enable comprehension while math describes experimental evidence no matter the math, the knowledge must conform to experience over acceptance of laws (experience, rules over math but math can become the last word, if true) words combine knowledge with experience the problem is often rules subdue the progression (see religions for proof of that) or ie.... the second is not pure, just observe the 1st (it makes the second moot) reason? Where did the potential difference come from (causality).)

why not state it clearly; the sky 'in total' is better described as black with lil white dots than blue; as to leave earth; the blue is thereby almost exclusively observed upon the earth (naturally speaking of course) some say, well the sky is the atmosphere; then i ask what is the night sky. my point is 'observational' or having an expanded view offers far more than staying put just to retain assimilation to the 'classical' view of observation. that is what science is all about. for example; if we all within 'existence', and we are from evolved life that came to be able to 'create' words; then could it be realized or even asked: is existence defining itself? (see words as fractals) can you get an idea of why i opened this thread?

nearly but not (google burning Hydrogen) kids are doing it all over the world right now! and then tell this forum what happens if you add a few elements (maybe even an alkali in the water vabor after the initial reaction of the H and O), could that add a wee bit of 'light' sure, all them batteries and within the instructions guide that came with them, are you suggesting they represented that or it is some other interpretation and you are calling it 'the answer' it was to assist you with understanding the 2 parts of electricity (voltage, amperage) i will leave the rest for others to observe (thanks for the addition)

thanks for the opinion it seems like a good method of just shelving the B bats, the electroplating the ideas of 'creating' light or basically the inclination any might have to tinker thanks for that fine representation of just being complacent with what others represent

K, i love the pursuit of evidence that is verifiable. (ie... once the truth is established and the understanding of life is comprehended globally; the rituals of beliefs will be over) i am on THE TEAM i am with you on that; we have the internet and why borders and direction of educational pursuits can be overcome. but in this case; the sky is more often black with lil'white dots than blue such as life has abused entropy for billions of years and the evidence far exceeds any measurements

i have been wrong from the eyes of the 'community' for almost 3 decades on more items than you can shake a stick at don't mean i am wrong to myself (meaning; i have more integrity to seek truth, reality and the absolute; then a reason to live) some talk about being absolute; some do it

is each line in this thread all true, of common sense and with enough evidence that a child could comprehend it Merged post follows: Consecutive posts merged now any can say the sky is not blue and be able to back it up

as ooooosual i offer thoughts and get hammered

so if i said the sky is black with lil' white dots; is it common sense with evidence or am i wrong just for observing in a different (albeit perfectly true) manner? ie.... eddington did not provide evidence for einsteins postulate on the space bending (eclipse) is what a mirage; the light from stars behind the sun are being diverted by the coronal energy of the sun. see how common sense and perspective just expose reality over the accepted renditions of classical physics

to share that the 'perspective' to classical physics is relevant

did you test it? is the quote from a guy in patent law? Did HE say, HE produced the potential (practically)? so you are being pessimistic without cause other than your personal knwledge being tested. because the attitude of yours is lost in contesting ME not the idea, the guy in patent law (to contest literally) or the publisher i posted an idea for a 'student' to think on as it was similar, easy and posted with something to read your post was nothing but condescending (offered nothing but negativity to the thread) at least i offered something the "inquisitive" may never have seen before and go check for him/herself (or any who wish to GO BEYOND the current communities "reductionary" thinking)

What makes your claim so pure when common sense can shut that position down? Merged post follows: Consecutive posts merged because of evidence, common sense, reality!

so let's get this straight; the OP is asking a question that not a one has addressed but all have a love of me! Why do magnetic feilds not affect the brain? Why does a 3 Tesla magnet (MRI) not affect biological processes if living things run as classically interpreted?

funny post at least 'ub' is correct wrong assumption

most say it is blue and talk about R scattering. i say otherwise. any wish to debate the color of the sky?

so what's the bitumen for? not bad for a few thousand years old. and now you are not being very 'electrical' in your thinking. The greater surface area the greater current. (ie... notice a battery in a car is high amp with low voltage) did you calculate the surface area based on the electrolyte or better still please share any 'search' you did to identify the amps? otherwise you are not being very helpful with appreciating what pyramid builders built well before the idea of internet ah.... so you just shared how little you know. them are amps (see how electricity works http://www.glenbrook.k12.il.us/gbssci/phys/Class/estatics/u8l4b.html (keep that math close, it's important to life too) and then see coulombs law (for kids) http://www.glenbrook.k12.il.us/gbssci/phys/Class/estatics/u8l3b.html and since the CARVING shared something similar as the OP mentions; that the tombs had to have light DEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEP down in there to even carve a damn thing as well, it 'could' work and be far more useful then plating, since there was LOW WOOD SUPPLIES and light is a big issue half the day i think this is an ignorant claim based on following what is published i consider that almost as nutty as believing in black holes, dark matter/energy and higgies (like huggies to an infant; required to keep the mess up)

did you do the math? did you take the bitumen into context? if the voltage is 'x' (per bat) did you calculate the amps with 4,5, or even 100 in series? Merged post follows: Consecutive posts merged and even in this video, they share how basic solar panels can do it (electrolysis) sure there maybe more items an mediums not covered in the OP (it was an idea i had from seeing the carving and remembering no one know what the B batteries were for; but they needed light in them deep tombs) i opened a thread to give others a chance to think it through here are physics on the matter http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/thermo/electrol.html

did not say they were, that we your assumption water flows thru a garden house or a straw; the rules are the same well beyond you even being aware of dahhhhhhhhh such is what i say about half the stuff you have mixed up for example; look at all the crap i took when you just couldn't read this is my post look up (google) 'crystal structures and neuron' the whole field is about to explode (another item is to look up is the nano tubular-like structures of the cytoskeleton, then notice how well 'light' conveys within) i said: tubular-like and notice how well 'light' conveys everything is and will MOST always be consistant with me! on the other hand Mokele, the errors are all yours

the B batteries can be built http://www.instructables.com/id/Building_a_quotBaghdad_Batteryquot/ and to create a potential and isolate Hydrogen and Oxygen from Water; to recombine them and you can create light. some time back after seeing a carving on the wall of an egyptian tomb i noticed what looked like 5 B bats in series that had a lead going into a larger one and from that 'light' now in the deep tombs, the oxygen is so low that lighting a lighter (bic) is tough but with electrolysis both the H and O are available and if the B bats are offering the potential for the electrolysis, then PERHAPS they were for 'light'............ (any thinking folks like the idea?) this thread is to offer any the ability to play with the idea and perhaps see if your school/community science group can 'create light' from this chemical configuration (self contained) Enjoy Merged post follows: Consecutive posts merged41 looks and not a comment or pole addition is this a religious forum?

sorry not real interested any further i have played with these types for decades

trying to delete the material i wish to report to moderation

i am getting the impression you don't like me i shared the 'good' of why observing the cytoskeleton (microtubles) like nano tubes in which far more research is 'predictable' as the laws, rules and evidence can be cross referenced and that was your comment looks like you and i have a problem! perhap get with current science (nanotubes is something you may wish to read up on) http://www.nanotechwire.com/news.asp?nid=7419 2/14/2009 6:27:02 PM DNA 'nanotubes' spark interest you are a funny one this is not hard i am used to it; material is offered and unless YOU have enough material knowledge YOU will not comprehend the bigger scope the brain does not work like a CPU. and it is because the brain does not work like the community believes it does... Here is a FACT; when you can comprehend how life works then you will be able to comprehend what i post; deal!

your child may look like you! (predicted) Mokele, face it! It's that time, wake up! this thread is not on you defending QM or 2LoT i posted physical evidence, not the math in QM at the planck scale you wanted something to hold in your hand and now you have it on every front but the only and i say ONLY thing, is that for you to cross the line, you know you have to break the law chaneelomics.... is that new to you? you are suggesting that proves the ion channels are conveying electrically charged particles across the membrane. M, your getting yourself lost remember, if you EVER have a charged particle, whether positive or negative; a magnetic field can affect it. Why? you just said it was BS without a chance and what the last 30 years of compiliation was for. weren't talking about the function of the cells it was offering you EVIDENCE to see what REAL scientist have performed in observance to specifics on what "Why do magnetic field not affect the brain?" i guess only you can answer that

so what, suggesting an observed crystaline structure within a cell (glial for example) does not mean is is just a protein and how they descibe it. and microfiliments, actin and a whole host (structures) 2 benefits with talking 'nano-tubes' a.... the scale b.....evidence in the nano tech opens many doors to comprehending living things. (bridging) sorry.... I know michael king (nasa contractor, owns nano tech firm) take my word for it; they can set the 'environment' but the 'growth' is still MAGIC that is your comment to this or even 'common sense'; 2 men; each can lift a maximum but together they can lift more than the sum of their individual maximums (basics) oooops! you are scaring me Merged post follows: Consecutive posts merged post it, please.... please share what you are claiming that supports this you cited material that proves YOU wrong. is this the kind of depth you have? you are generalizing that consciousness is based on the neo with that as your evidence? Merged post follows: Consecutive posts mergedi wish to add something to this thread i am not putting ME and being anything but an assistance for thinking each item posted is based on addressing the questions of the OP and the why telling me i am wrong without having the ability to really know what your talking about is rude why not just observe what EVIDENCE and ideas are running RIGHT NOW all over the world and let's EVOLVE otherwise, you folks are starting to seems like religious folks holding a book saying 'nah-huh not per my belief'