RyanJ

Here are some more that add to what encipher has already said: http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/csref/html/vcwlkunsafecodetutorial.asp ^ Simple tutorial from MS. http://www.softsteel.co.uk/tutorials/cSharp/cIndex.html http://www.c-sharpcorner.com/ http://www.eggheadcafe.com/tipstricks.asp Last one is general .NET stuff but it may help Cheers, Ryan Jones

Or better a film called vertical limit, since when is NG red for one? Also, they say its so unstable that light would detonate it... Cheers, Ryan Jones

Here is an idea, if you want to fake a file type, make your own and then assign it the icon you want. This can allow you to "fake" a zip file or anything else. As for global hooks, I suggest you look at MSDN, something like this: http://msdn.microsoft.com/msdnmag/issues/02/10/CuttingEdge/ There are loads of others there that explain how you could impliment them Cheers, Ryan Jones

I believe the equation you are looking for is: [math]\frac{n!}{(n - r)!r!}[/math] Where n is the number of objects (In your case 4) and r is the number of objects to be chosen (4 again) Substitute the values and you'll have an answer Cheers, Ryan Jones

I was talking abut the source code and always have been talking about the source code. I'm just going to give up trying to explain what I am saying and hit my head against the wall instead.

Yes I know you did and I agreed with you :S I simply replied to drochaid to point out what OS was Cheers, Ryan Jones

... So whats the problem? the source is still free? My point exactly. Cheers, Ryan Jones

Yea they could but not for the code its self, the bandwidth or whatever yes but the code no otherwise its not accessible to anyone and everyone. Its like people who distribute Firefox on CD with the code, you pay for the disks but not for the code. Cheers, Ryan Jones

Its not really a restriction, notifying an author that your using a part of the code is not really a restriction as I see it. As for paying, shure its allowed but you don't have to... like your example you could simply download the other version and convert it yourself thus avoiding all costs but its easier to just pay for the code then to do it your self. As I said in one of my earlier posts, they can't charge you for the source but they can charge for work, bandwidth costs etc. Cheers, Ryan Jones

In that case I stand corrected on that part. Cheers, Ryan Jones

The explosion would cause pieces of car to be removed and thrown with a hell of a lot of force and energy shredding the person, then we have the shock wave that would tear the body appart inside... its like a crash, its not the actuall crash that kills you - its the stopping Cheers, Ryan Jones

Yes, as I said earlier it puts no limit on nwhat you can chanrge for it. As is the case with anything, you could download the Linux version and modify it to work under Windows yourself - you'r not paying for the code but the work that has been done. Yup, I know that - I only know of a few that actually use it. Cheers, Ryan Jones

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fireproofing May prove useful for you Cheers, Ryan Jones

Nope, nope and tripple nope. ID is not a science and has no link to any science at all. Haven't we had this question lot of times before...? Its not going to happen, ever. Religion and science should be kept apart and ID is not part of science at all. Cheers, Ryan Jones

So the equations do not strictly forbid negative mass (and negative energy from existing)? I also agree with 5614, I don't think there is negative mass. Too me it makes no sence that something can have less then no mass. Cheers, Ryan Jones

I know enough about the open source lisences because I spent a year of study in ICT studying the effects, uses and benefits of open source software. Cheers, Ryan Jones

It does not say anything about costs, no-one ever said it did. it does however enshure that the source code is always available to anyone that wants it without question.

What do you mean? Anything open souce for one gives you the right to do just that. Cheers, Ryan Jones

A team of researchers at Washington University in St. Louis has found a protein that has been found to play a major part in the deactivation of genes. We understand how these are disabled but the question of how the genes to be disabled are chosen is unknown. If we can ever find the choice mechanism could we then harness this to disable faulty genes in people? Only time will tell but it looks promising. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/05/060505114437.htm - Ryan Jones

We have all heard the theory that life may have originated somewhere else in the universe and then came to Earth on the back of a comet -- well, this may be partially true. Researchers used a microscopic imaging technique have shown that some meteorites can and do contain simple organic compunds, some up to 7%! Could this mean life came from or was kick-started by an asteroid? This we don't yet know but the possibility is there. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/05/060505192530.htm - Ryan Jones

Yup, anything along those lines... MS are just money hungry and greedy... Long live free software and better still open source software. Cheers, Ryan Jones