radienx000

hmm what if the universe was unstable, then probably it is unstable because of the stuff inside the bubble is not in accordance with the things outside if it, because of the difference in time.

The Universe appears to be expanding, with Galaxies moving further away from each other and some coming closer. Could this be explained by Einstein's Theory of General Relativity? I wonder if the universe did occur from a "Big Bang". But there can be another speculation, that the universe is way older then we expected and that is why there is a loss in the account of the total mass and energy in the whole. Why is the universe older? Well imagine a bubble, and inside this bubble was our known universe (our observations). If the time within the bubble was different to the time outside the bubble then the time inside the bubble would be slower then the outside. Im going to call this "Time Bubble". These pockets in space are "Left-overs" of the "main universe" that had occurred from the big bang or "what was". We know that the larger the mass of an object, the more space it bends and hence the slower time progresses. What if the Galaxies were expanding due to a procedure of moving about that was placed since the beginning of the universe? And that all the other Time Bubbles died out of existence because they had a smaller mass then us, and hence time went faster for them? And so that would account for the missing mass that we measured. Because the measurements made within this Time Bubble could be different outside of it, hence it is not accurate to say that the missing mass/energy were actually Dark matter/energy.

Does understanding morality help us stop from doing bad things?? Then why do people eat meat, when killing a sentient being is morally wrong?

Omgsh, this hypercube with many dimensions is rotating, and its really confusing O_O

i think that what your saying is that time is independent, and it is seen to have a "self".

Well this could only be true if the Big Bang did existed. But if everything started from one point, than wouldn't everything evolve into the same thing? Cause from one point in space, if it were to expand, then everything on the two ends of the point, would be symmetrical and so everything would end up being the same thing because it started from the same point. Understandable??

I watched this video and wondered if physics or science, would be able to explain these events.. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLJRX0w3m_I

Maybe term here is "Being High"

I was speculating on UFOs for abit, watching NASA footage of unidentified spacecraft. And I think those weird shapes of spacecraft is probably due to "aliens" using Bioships (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bioship). These bioships come in a variety of sizes and shapes because the ship "grows" extra limbs or something. And I also saw "unidentified objects" in the NASA footage's appearing out of nowhere. So probably these aliens programmed these flying organisms to travel at the speed of thought. Cause physical can travel faster than the speed of light, but what about the speed of thought? Maybe the bioship has it's own brain or something.

I said "If" it were possible.

To briefly put it, I think that morality originated from the viewpoint of being realistic and immorality originated from a unrealistic point of view.

Well I was thinking of Le' Ch atelier's principle, where the universe could be seen as a system at equilibrium and any additions/reductions of mass or energy will cause it to shift to the side that causes the minimum disturbance. So to be able to detect any observable changes in the universe may prove that something has entered (or left) the universe. Now how, I do not know, sorry =\ But I can dogmatically assume that time has something to do with it. Like time dilation, or gravitational forces at work to reduce addition (or lost) of energy/mass.

On the Science of Time and on the Law of the Conservation of Energy and Matter The "quantity of force which can be brought into action in the whole of nature is unchangable". Energy or "force" cannot be increased or dimished in the whole universe. Moreover, mass or matter cannot be lossed or gained in this universe. In science, the flow of time or the arrow of time considers time to be linear. This must be true, as we have repeated and performed so many experiments and many have been proven correct because of this linear time. However, others consider time to be cyclic, and some believe time has no part in nature, that what is time is merely human invention and what is here is now. Yet we cannot escape the fact that every physical motion, every movement of matter depends upon time. Then what of energy? What of mass? It has been proven over many times that E = mc(squared) Energy is conditioned by mass and mass is conditioned by energy. Yet the movement of mass is conditioned by time, could this also affect the transfer of energy? Logically speaking, the answer is yes. But what about the whole universal quantity of energy, and of mass, what role does time play?? Well mass and energy are scalar quantities, so definiately time has no role. Now we are aware that time is merely a tool devised by man, time has no place in the universe in its' own right, hence it is apart of a vector quantity. Now contemplating upon that space and time are which energy and mass travel through, and we know that the movement of particles is due to kinetic energy and potential energy, is there a relationship between time, mass and energy? Regarding the fact that time is not absolute, lets take a simple experiment to explain the relationship. If two identical fob watches were placed in a vaccum chamber, and they were separated by 30 cm and then I made these two watches tick at the exact moment, lets say they both start at 12:00. Now we wait till they both reach time 3:00. That means 3 hours have passed. The mass of the fob watches are identical and they both had the same source of energy in their batteries. That means in 3 hours they lossed the same amount of energy, and remember that mass did not change. Lets posulate that the vaccum chamber is our universe, all mass and energy is kepted constant. Now lets take the ideas of Parallel universes, time travel, and paradoxes into action in this universe. If another fob watch from a parallel universe was to enter our chamber then would this mean the total energy and mass of the universe be added because of it? 1. This will violate the Law of the Conservation of Energy and Mass. So parallel universes do not exist. 2. This will not violate the Law of Conservation of Energy and Mass. So parallel universes do exist. Why? Maybe because transfer of mass and energy between universes is not possible, we may never know? So all we know is that time can be warped and only goes in a straight line. In regarding to the possiblity of time travel, we can look at the Grandfather paradox. Basically, if you travel back in time and killed your grandfather, than you could have never been born. However, even the possiblity of time travel must be considered. Like the parallel universe; If I was to time travel into the past, then would that mean the total energy of the past universe be added because of me?? 1. This will violate the Law of the conservation of Energy and Mass. And time travel is not possible. 2. This will not violate the Law of the convseration of Energy and Mass. Why?? 1) The energy is somehow converted to suit the past universe's total energy. 2) We are in the same universe. 1) and 2) can be considered to be true. Think of mass and time dilation from Einstein's General Theory of Relativity. Remembering that reference point is important in the dilation of time and mass, from our point of view, mass did not changed in the past universe. However, if another person were to measure the total mass of the universe than it would be 1 person + the universe added!! If the whole energy state were to be kepted constant, no matter what time you travel to, then mass of the universe would have changed to suit the change from the time traveller's starting point to his/her finish point. If thats true than 1) is correct. In the reference point of the person who "measured" the total mass of the universe, than time travel is not possible at all as it violates the Law of E/M. But if it didn't violate it, that means that another universe could not be created but instead we are time travelling in the same universe! So 2) must also be plausible and both people are correct. In regarding the time traveller, he/she would have noticed the shift in time because it is in he/her reference point. But the people around the time traveller would not have noticed it in their reference point. This is because once the time traveller travels through time the whole of the universe must change it's mass accordingly and by not violating the Law of E/M, mass would have been converted to energy and energy to mass.

Hi, I'm looking for a career on engineering and planning spaceships, floating cities, underwater habitats... Basically something thats to do with possible future habitats for both environment and humans. Does anyone know what course is related to that in a university in Australia? Regards, radienx000

IS it possible to make an actual sonic screwdriver?! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonic_screwdriver I was thinking of a practical method in making one. I thought of buying the sonic screwdriver applying some kind of ultrasound into it. As a method of putting ultrasound in, I would get quartz ( a piezoelectric crystal) and install it within the sonic screwdriver. And then I would somehow apply an alternating current into the quartz to make it vibrate back-and-forth as to produce ultrasound. One question, how do you make alternating current from batteries? Cause batteries provide only DC current.

Is it possible to make floating cities from the concept of superconductivity? As the superconductor would exclude the external magnetic field and levitate. So this city might be able to float on our skies by having internal superconductive engines. Also if the superconductor was strong enough, it might be able to be sent into space where it can repel any space/celestial object that comes close to it. If this space object had a magnetic field of its own. I see that we have not found a superconducting material that has a high enough critical temperature for us to use it without wasting our electricity and hence money on lowering to temperature to make the superconductor effective.