wormholeman

By "disrupting" a spatial area in space using heat (or friction). On a large scale: A massive heat (or friction) conductor can be used to pass an object or light through the space it is concentrated on. Where the conductor is focused, space will be warped in an unusual way, depending on the technique related to the conductor and "objective"-space will determine how much quicker (or slower) the "Object" or "light" will pass through ("via shortcut"). The light in question dose not increase in speed.

And yet if you think about it a flame on a match is made of pure light,like the sun.But also a flame of a match is a very small example. I chose that example cause it is a good example.

Rasori: It dosen't matter what kind of spatial enviroment it is in, the theory works both ways! Im sure of it! Ofcourse you can't light a match under water... yourdadonpogos: I see what your saying, yes! light dose stop if you were to place a solid object in front of it: Though! I believe if friction is conducted between the objective-(space) and the entity: None the less! the entity is matter, though open matter, which I also believe will disrupt space, alowing an object like light to pass through: Hence being space warped-(disrupted)-or-(disfiguration) causing and or contraction... Though also..Depending on the circumstances I also believe it may also take longer for the light to pass through: I think using whatever procedure, and expirementing with the different types of techniques will sum an answer eather way. You can also imagine the entity being a vessel with a friction developer attached to it, it could move through the wormhole or: (disruption in space concentrated within). My answer for why it would be faster to get to one place to another: It's a know fact that we (even light) can get faster to a place in time by just taking a shortcut! P.s There are many space like enviroments.

Ok! If the speed of light is constant? What happens when there is a shortcut? It would mean that the light has gotten to a point in space much quicker. And yes I realize the speed of light always travels at 186,000 miles a second.

Seems to me like you guys are talking about dimensions. I dont know If spatial relativity implys that there are multiple realitys. But this can go in a pretty fancy direction: http://www.krioma.net/articles/Bridge%20Theory/Einstein%20Rosen%20Bridge.htm This link talks abit about parallel universes if you read on.

Hey Eon! Just because I think it has hit rock bottom dosent mean that that is reality! It can be thought of in another way. If the alpha train moves first then the second and so on and when It finally reaches 10.000 times. The alpha train can move again causing a sort of whiplash on the other trains making them move back again to their original starting point.(the cascade effect)...Ok! right now I feel I have said to much on this thread and I should be scolded P.s Just because I say things that "seem" to contradict..Dose not mean its true. If I were an Illusionist and you saw me lift a 10000000000000 pound building with my index finger...Dose not mean I can! :0

I just realized something..How can those trains move in succession to one another. If the alpha train moves first then the 2nd train where to move the next, and so on once it reaches 10,000 times? Then you say the alpha train would move again (repeat) So If all those trains are now at the front of each other? How will they move again???? I think we have hit rock bottom!! :I Sorry..

What a thought!! I think It can go as far as it can, as long as there is a conductor in every-one of those trains. As for limit? I dont know if the universe is unending.

Ok! I read somewhere that Einstien also had a theory that he concluded that a beam of light would bend at massive objects (like the sun). Some astrophysicist 's(pardon the spelling!) had a chance to prove his theory and the results where correct! So your question! "Does gravity have an effect on length (contraction or expansion)" ..So thinking that a massive object like our sun that has massive gravity property..If it can bend a beam of light, then the gravity of the sun (or space around it) is contracting or expanding in some form or another. Very interesting! Jacques :^)

Yes! I believe that only the beholder of the question can only necessitate on this.

Tounge in cheek :^)? I may sound contridictory. But I knew nothing of metaphysics till I looked it up in the dictionary ( this day july21/2005 at precisely 5:50pm)<----now thats tounge in cheek .

Very cool! : ) franz_liszt

I think your right about that franz_liszt...I have been taught and to accept that im able to calculate that 1 + 1 = 2. Even Einstien believed that math conforms to reality. So I dont believe that philosophy can answer the question. I do believe philosophy can give insight and can lead to an answer.

franz_liszt: Newton's scientific definition? I think he stumbled upon a brilliant Idea! I say stumbled because the apple fell on his head...:^0

My overall philosophy is to have an open mind and accept the things I can't answer or change.

For definitions on those subjects, I have always known that one word can have many definitions: It always depends on what context you use it in, if thinking in scientific terms then it will refer to scientific terms and vice/versa thats my two cents

His question is.."Is there a difference between the measurement of time and time itself" The way I understand that question if he's referring to "time" which is "A nonspatial continuum in which events occur in apparently irreversible succession from the past through the present to the future" and ("time itself") <---what dose he mean by that? How can time be by it's self...seems to me that "time" and "time it self" collide together. re-edit: Just a thought! Don't we measure time with a clock?..

I dont know them personally but you can check out their website at http://einstein.stanford.edu/ Your welcome.. Atheist!

You are right yourdadonapogos...My mistake..(I cant rely 100% on my own brainpower always, seemed like it was correct one.) "They will measure how space and time are warped by the presence of the Earth, and, more profoundly, how the Earth's rotation drags space-time around with it" As for Mr. Jacques question..I now admit I dont have an answer..but only this response! :I

I know of some scientists that are trying to prove that theory. They shot up a satalite around earths orbit that had a gyroscope to measure if Einstiens theory is true. The results of it are not finished from what I know of.

I believe that time, if your referring itself to a clock is a tool made by man. also there is a difference if time is being referred to as in the past or the future. So yes I believe there is a difference.

I have theory about how a wormhole can be made very easily. And that is.. If I where to strike a match and allow a beam of light to pass through it, I bet the beam of light would pass through quicker than if no flame was present. How much faster would it be? Using that example, the difference would be very minut.. (extremely!) Here's my equation. How can we explain an enviroment in which only space exists. We can imagine as space to be objective. If space equals "O" as "Objective" and if we were to disrupt "O" with an entity equaling "E" (an example of an entity can be that of a flame of a match) where the entity is the disruption equal to friction, then E + O equals warps or disfiguration in the null fabric of space where E + O is concentrated. The many tiny disfigurations (within the interaction of E + 0) looking at it as a whole can be percieved as an Einstien Rosen Brige or what we now know as a wormhole. Pretty cool, Huh?