i havent been back since i started this thread as such, i havent had a chance to read this all. i will get to but it's alot of reading. however, i would like to add one more element to this that i didnt see anyone mention. and its obvious one too.
is there any weight in the fact that the criminal that was executed was found guilty by a jury? a trial by jury is a trial by the people, a trial by your peers. can it be argued that it was t5he jury that determined the consequences and the system is just carrying out the people's decision? isnt it in a sense saying that society no longer wants him as a member of society or to even live?