Bill Wolfe

1. Yes. It actually flows fastest there.

 

2. Yes and yes. Classically speaking' date=' gravity is another force and they are vectors.[/quote']

 

Uh, no swantsont, it doesn't. Time 'flows' more slowly in the stronger gravity well.

 

As for the yes and yes answers. . .if you're interested, see my other post to the original question.

Mot. . .

To answer your questions:

"Does time exist outside of a gravity well?" Yes, time exists everywhere, even in the meanest nastiest black hole. It just moves more slowly FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF ANY OBSERVER OUTSIDE THE BLACK HOLE. The view from the inside would be the opposite, the rest of the universe would appear to speed up.

"If you are in a space station that is spinning to give artificial gravity, then will spinning the space station always cause artificial gravity? " The centripetal (or centrifugal, depending on where you are in the system) force mimics gravity but it is not. It's just Newtonian necromancy. And yes, no matter where you are in the universe. . .even in an area of space so empty that galaxies are not visible. . .it will work exactly the same as in free fall or at a la Grange point.

"My guess is that in order to have the acceleration, the space craft has to be in a gravity well. " This statement makes no sense to me. If you mean the radial acceleration of the spinning body. . .no, it has nothing to do with a gravity well. Don't forget that if you entered your hypothetical spinning station at the axis and never touched the sides, you would be in free fall until you grabbed something moving and let it pull you around and around.

If you did it just right using suit thrusters, you would hover just above the moving 'floor' of the space station while people standing on the 'floor' would zip past you. This scenario assumes no air in the station, by the way. The moving air inside would eventually cause you to 'catch up' with the spin of the station and you would 'fall' to the 'floor.'

"The corollary question is, does a change in the gravity well affect the perceived gravity inside the space station?" The answer to this is probably 'no.' If you are in a gravity well and the spinning space station is in free fall--either because it's in a stable orbit or because it is freely falling toward whatever massive body is the source of the gravity. . .then there would be no effect at all. But if thrust is being applied to the spinning station to keep it from falling into the gravity well, that thrust would tend to tilt the forces inside the station in a direction opposite that of the thrust.

Does any of this make sense?

GR and SR (and if you don't know what those stand for you probably won't be able to follow the rest of this. . .) are being seriously challenged by the new generation of physicists.

The quick and simple answer to the original question is that gravity IS curved space. And yes, let's say that from a light-year away you have measured an object and have an accurate result. If a very massive gravity well (like a black hole) were to approach your object to the point where it was experiencing tremendous gravitational acceleration and you were able to measure that object again, it would appear to 'stretch' toward the gravity well.

However, if you were floating in space next to it, it would not appear to have stretched at all. Why? Because you, too would be in the area of curved space and so would whatever instrument you were using to measure with.

The specifics of your question involves a discussion of the Higgs Boson and the nature of matter, but the answer is both yes and no. YES--if you are far enough away that you and your measuring instruments are not effected by the curved space that we call gravity. And NO, if you and your instruments are too close.

Sorry, but that's the best answer there is. If you have any problems with it, feel free to talk to the designer.