GogoJF

Hopefully Maxwell's equations do reflect a certain reality about nature and the way man performs experiments. Otherwise, wouldn't they be meaningless?

Maxwell's measurements are correct because he was measuring the speed inside the box where two way operations occur.

This cannot be the fact. Can you give the well known documentation? These numbers have been fudged to fit the expectations. I can assure you of this.

This is a strange experiment. The two mirrors act as a set of eyes measuring light in terms of a single direction. Merged post follows: Consecutive posts mergedI wrote a paper titled "A Case in Instantaneous Cosmology and the Disqualification of Jupiter's Moons". It basically describes how Roemer's method is an incorrect model used to measure the speed of light. Originally Roemer only measured two-thirds of the speed of light, and this should have been indication enough of a flaw in logic. Merged post follows: Consecutive posts mergedI wrote a paper titled "A Case in Instantaneous Cosmology and the Disqualification of Jupiter's Moons". It basically describes how Roemer's method is an incorrect model used to measure the speed of light. Originally Roemer only measured two-thirds of the speed of light, and this should have been indication enough of a flaw in logic.

The problem can be solved if we learn to distinguish between two way and one way light. Examples of one way light: 1. the act of seeing 2. Lenard's second crucial experiment 3. Arago's first crucial experiment 4. the Michelson-Morley experiment These are simply experiments performed in one direction only Examples of two way light: 1. Fizeau's toothed wheel experiment 2. All radar experiments 3. the GPS system 4. the functioning of atomic clocks These are simply experiments performed in two or more directions. One way experiments do not require a mirror for transport. All the time taken for two way experiments to perform the experiment within the device is equal to the velocity c.

Well, I guess the best thing to do is ask a specific question, and I'll try to answer it as to the best of my abilities. As far as believing or proving instant light- there really is no math- at least none that has been invented so far. But there are subtle evidences which exist in ALL experiments. I guess it's a matter of interpretation, and conventional physics hates a alternate point of view. So, essentially, in the short term, I could argue, but, you would not agree until the long term. How would I ever be able to alter you point of view which is so ingrained?

How much value will it require for you to believe in me? My very soul. What should I tell you and what should I keep to my breast? What do I need to show to you, to prove, while at the same time, being ignored, taken for granted, and literally, all ideas are taken from you because science can speak a thousand different languages?

Well, Mooeypoo, maybe we are destined to sit on the opposite sides of the fence, but, in the end, I don't think so. That your way of thinking and my way of thinking will have an intersection. Have you read my paper yet?

The title should be "light is instantaneous", not "time is instantaneous.

I believe that light is instantaneous and I refer this thought process to a paper that I have written “The Instantaneousness of Light and the Four Models of Light Measure”, which can be Goggled. Concerning time and space There is no doubt that even the most average person would know the difference between time and space. Space is a measure of our manipulation, in terms of man being able to affect a phenomenon. Space is represented by the squaring of three lengths- length, width, and height. Time is often considered the fourth dimension. In terms of the other three dimensions, time has no significance outside the living organism. Time is a purely man-made measure designed to measure the three dimensions in terms of the observer only. Time, in terms of any of the other lengths, is not measurable. Time carries no dimension as length. Time is an instrument of three dimensional lengths, as measured by man only.

I believe that light is instantaneous and I refer this thought process to a paper that I have written “The Instantaneousness of Light and the Four Models of Light Measure”, which can be Goggled. Concerning time and space There is no doubt that even the most average person would know the difference between time and space. Space is a measure of our manipulation, in terms of man being able to affect a phenomenon. Space is represented by the squaring of three lengths- length, width, and height. Time is often considered the fourth dimension. In terms of the other three dimensions, time has no significance outside the living organism. Time is a purely man-made measure designed to measure the three dimensions in terms of the observer only. Time, in terms of any of the other lengths, is not measurable. Time carries no dimension as length. Time is an instrument of three dimensional lengths, as measured by man only.