Kedas

I don't know, I assume they don't make higher res shots because the zone is to big. http://www.ncbe.rdg.ac.uk/MARS/PDF/landingzone.pdf Not sure if this was made before or after. edit: here a picture not sure about the orientation.http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA05019 (before landing)

I was joking but you are incorrect it could make a small crater. Not only the size/weight is important to know if there will be a crater or not the speed at impact is also very important. quote from the weird beagle-2 professor: To locate a crater with high resolution shots you would need a picture from before and after. (we obvious don't have one of before)

Has anyone an idea about how difficult it would be to make real what isn't ? Let say they did make everything and did launch and have their probe around mars. but like the beagle2 the lander crashed also but NASA can't afford that so how much would it take to fake a succesfull landing? how many people should know it to make it work? Keep in mind that the Mars Express can also pick up signals from mars (so NASA&ESA should be close friends then). even on Earth they can be detected with large detectors/telescopes.

Anyone saw that new big crater on mars ??

Thanks for the laugh. for me it's the same as asking where is 'don't crash' located in my computer. But if you really want some scientific ideas you can find that here: http://assc.caltech.edu/conferences.html

I don't see a face (unless I let myself see what I don't ) But I must say it does look kinda special (not referring to any complex shape/form etc..)

Some are old at 45 some not even at 70. BTW stupid proposal. economy more important than life ???? (illogical) If we were slaves this would be a good idea.

"WITH audience participation" Since I saw that program about secrets of magicians I don't see any value in audience even the camera crew is in it most of the time they say no videocamera tricks used but they work together with the magicians. 50/50 means they compare TWO things?!

Was there a reference group/test? BTW explain/refer how 87% was calculated.

OK. but 87% for one try has no meaning at all. You would have to try let say 100 times and then make an average otherwise it just coincidence. (one try could have any result, maybe they tried 10 times and broadcasted the best one) (BTW, I was unsuccessful to get in an IRC channel, or whatever you call it)

Don't we need to know which numbers will be drawn before we can change them? (makes it a bit pointless to change them then) with other words: Don't we need a feedback line before we can change something. (I thought some scientific experiments pointed in that direction)

Yes of course why not, Some things we like some we dislike and some we just don't care, Or on a physical level you could be deaf then someone that is yelling behind you wil not be noticed at all resulting in no reaction.

It would be very boring here on earth if we would react all the same on the same stimuli/information. That we change when we age/grow is normal

Then you don't live. I didn't say that you keep that way of being only the 'first time'.

Maybe a bit bold but: (just an other perspective) Life begins when 'it' for the first time prefers it's own life above anyone/thing else. Not sure when that is but is sure before birth.

exactly!! 'JUST A THOUGHT'

Thanks for al the input seems the most difficult job is to fiind a host for free that supports it. (I don't mind a few pop-up's)

So you are only missing the 5, right? BTW '22' makes sense two persons thinking about '2'

If you want to look for history chances you can find that here: http://www.national-lottery.co.uk/player/files/Lotto.csv If someone is willing to select the easypatterns (if any) in those then we can check the amount of winners. 2000-02-26,45,8,6,5,3,16,1,2,MERLIN This one is very close, although what is Ball Set? Yeah I know this isn't really of any influance on your experiment. It's fun to play with this lottery result checker: http://www.national-lottery.co.uk/player/p/results/winCheck/winCheckerStart.do (select max day's,180)

you say most but that isn't really relevant here if the numbers can easy be generated. Even if only 0.0001% of the people has such a thought like lets do crazy this week you will still end up with many.

LOL, damn and I just sold mine You would still need the experiance and software to get the signal out of the noise. (even with a very large one)

I just realized that you will probably have about 5 (I think) people that also think about those numbers but don't know anything about your test. logical/less-random patterns always have more winners.

I'm just watched/listened to the live internet broadcast of the press conference and it are not all equal opportunities. They will try blind commanding now !! (after the complete risk analises) http://www.beagle2.com/resources/video-album.htm They sure not thinking about giving up now. Monday morning 8:30 new press conference. (unless very important news before it) Did you know they originaly didn't plan to be able to get contact with beagle2 for the first 10day's but with Odyssey they can try earlier Mars express will only enter the game later on. (important from software point of view) When? I understood 30Jan but that is so late? that is also when Odyssey has to start doing other NASA things.

Thanks but I want more than just an album. so it will have to be a self build website I just need to know what I will need and where to find it.

I have no experience with website java or scripts of any language. I made a small website but notting interactive yet. I read PHP is easier/better than Perl ?