stevensrd1

Not that this makes the news in the alternative energy area much, but its news worthy none the less. In my personal research as a builder and experimenter with alternative energy systems, I have built water batteries that supply non stop power from years to decades. They never need recharging and the only downside is the coils may need cleaning once a year or so to remove any corrosion. And since they only use plain water they are non toxic as well. Some nic nacks I have powered on water batteries I put up on my youtube channel at url deleted

You know I invented a little thing I call the water cell. Basically its pure magnesium as a negative electrode wrapped in a sponge and copper around that as your positive electrode. Set it in water and you got your water cell which equates to say a single AA battery. I run things like quartz wall clocks, digital clocks, led lights, certain types or motors and so forth on water cells. They basically last forever with minor wear or require minor maintenance even since they sit in just pure water. I dont use salts, acids or any added chemicals. So I tried to get some news coverage on this. I run a live cam that displays things powered on water which is usually up 24/7 at live cam I thought the news might find this interesting, since I said they can come check it out,,take it apart, do what they want to it to prove its all real and on the up and up. I posted that on the live cam page. Also I sent many emails to many news agencies saying the same. You want to know how many were interested, how many wanted to come see it? Guess...NONE..I also sent many emails to many scientist that I found online, many scientific websites even.. They also sent no replies, seemed not interested. And I have gotten a few that said i was a fake or worse. Now I told the truth, I said you can come check it out,,take it apart,,see its real,,or just do it to prove im a fake if I am. Which by the way Im not. But none would. And the more I think about this, the more it upsets me because I love science. I like to think science can save us as a species. Help us find new and easier ways to live,,ways to stop polluting the world. But now Im starting to think otherwise...Perhaps its not science thats to blame, but people stepping in the way of science, preventing it from helping us. Either way its very sad to say the least.

Ive posted to many forums even, then i get replies or emails saying thats not possible,,or that im faking it and so on. And I think to myself,,hey these people are either trying to hide the truth,,or there igits. And yes I mean that in the worst possible way,,why? Because I am an igit. So what does that tell ya. Anyway ok sorry about that, just got an email and well.. I mean its not like I said oh give me money or I wont tell you how its done. Sure I have a donate link,,every bit helps further other project. But I tell exactly how its done, how to run things on water. I made videos on youtube showing how. I even have a live cam that runs 24/7 now showing different things Im running on water. Yes I mean water, no salts,,no acids and no chemicals added. Things like wall clocks,,digital clocks,,led lights, motors and so forth,,all of which is covered over and over in my videos. Ahh again sorry just slightly irked. Ok so the live cam if anyone wants to visit is Things running on water.

No im not lying, and im not running a light im running a small motor. But since Ive been called a lier, I see no further need to even post here, best wishes to the rest, goodbye.

I do tend to find most right off the bat saying its impossible, The designs I posted on my website do work, they are not 100 percent efficient, but maybe not to far behind it, they do work. They were posted in the hopes to lead others in a new direction that to me has been overlooked. However the second schematic on my website I have been running for about a week now, swapping the two batteries. And Im working on another design, which holds more promise it seems. it relates to two batteries in series and three in parallel. The series batteries run the motor and charge the others. And with that I have been swapping one series battery per run, and it has been running longer then a week. Perhaps that holds a key, the three in parallel charging at once,,since as one of them gets switched per run,,the other two, get two runs to charge thus charging more. Perhaps more in parallel would do even better, since batteries wired in parallel, even if not being charged they divide their power equally among themselves given a bit of time which is a sort of a self charge in itself, looking at it from the right perspective. I found just any motor wont do as well, tho on one of my running projects a larger motor is used and works well, a cd motor it is,,another of similar size did not work so well. And on another project I have running a small motor the size of the pinky finger is used. There is something to this, its not complicated. It works by means of a potential difference, which I added to the writing on my website for others to grasp. It is the potential difference that can be used, and there will always be potential difference if the batteries are switched correctly.

actually electrons do move between any two negative or positive poles if one of the poles has a higher or lower potential. The only reason a pole is called positive or negative is one has a higher or lower potential. For example take two batteries one weak and one strong, now put either their positive or negative poles together, now take your meter and read the other two poles or battery ends, you will find one is positive and one negative according to the meter, regardless that they are the same poles of different batteries, enjoy!

I been working on a few projects over the years in relation to free energy. I posted some of my schematics to some self recharging free energy battery projects on my website. Here is the link http://batteryprojects.yolasite.com/