GUNITTHEORY

G-Unit Theory says NO. By definition, only one universe exists. gunittheory.bravehost.com

Evolution was heresy in Darwin's times as it is today. It makes the theory no less valid. Since god is based only on faith but science is based on physical observation and hard data, evolution still wins every time. They should not allow "Intelligent Design" within 100 feet of a school, and it probably does violate the separation of church and state.

According to the standard model, matter and energy may neither be created nor destroyed, but may only change forms. Therefor, you may not get something from nothing within the universe, and though I am not up on vector analysis, it is mistaken in its interpretation of this particular case. I am able to tell because it is illogical. Matter and Energy being conserved, means they change forms - not coming from nothing or returning to nothing. I would try applying physical chemistry to the problem instead of vector analysis. G-Unit Theory defines the universe as continuous on its interval. Therefor, there is no nothing within the universe. Every bit of the universe is composed of G-Units, spinning permeable spherical gravitational units with a diameter of a Planck length and a mass of a Planck mass. The resolution of the universe being on the level of a Planck length, what we observe popping mysteriously out of "nothing" is symmetrical gravitational octahedral formation. Small particles are crystallizing out of the highly geometrical spacefoam. Present science can only see, say with an electron microscope or such, *10-15 meters , possibly *10-20 meters , on a good day. The resolution of the universe is on the level of a Planck length, *10-35 meters. Everything above *10-20 meters is considered nothing according to the standard model. G-Unit Theory goes all the way down to the Planck length and can explain these phenomena that the standard model only guesses at. TG.Zephrym Cochran, for all you star trek fans.

A vector has both magnitude and direction. According to the standard model, matter and energy are neither created or destroyed but merely change forms between one another. According to G-Unit Theory, the substance of the universe, its most basic building "blocks" - G-Units, spinning permeable spherical gravitational units with a diameter of a Planck length and a mass of a Planck mass and their interactions comprise the phenomena known as matter and energy. G-Unit Theory First Revised Edition should be coming out soon. The 2.1 solar mass pulsar detected by the fine gentlemen who wrote this article lends further credibility and direct sample evidence to the negation of the Smolin conjecture. In order for the conjecture to be valid, this pulsar which has been detected could not exist. Since it does exist, and the theory of the conjecture violates the first law of thermodynamics, the Smolin conjecture is proven false by logical negation backed by physical evidence and data. I am a great fan of Smolin and the Ashtekar group but he was obviously wrong in asserting this or any multiple universe theory. TG, Zephrym Cochran

The only reason that it is valid to set one side of a thermodynamics equation to zero is because dE=0, or the total energy of the universe is constant! References to other types of equations which use such technique are mere attempts to skirt this issue. However, I believe that other uses of this technique also rely on the concept of equilibrium in a physical system - the technique works for physical, closed systems in equilibrium. It further proves the point that Smolin's conjecture is false for this universe must be a closed system in equilibrium and not some imaginary multiple universe fancy for dE=0. As far as science only being able to prove something false. I agree with you here. I find without a shadow of a doubt that Smolin's conjecture violates the first law of thermodynamics and is therefor proven false because of that fact.

The first law of thermodynamics is valid or the technique of solving thermodynamic equations by setting one side of the equation to zero would not work. Since it works in all cases, the first law of thermodynamics is certainly valid and quite inviolate. Smolin's conjecture is quite wrong in its assertion that multiple universes exist no matter how popular it is with the scientific community at large. Further, the first law of thermodynamics may be one of the closest algebraic forms to describe the universe which certainly borders upon the divine.

G-Unit Theory dictates by definition that multiple universes do not exist. According to the standard model, it would break the first law of thermodynamics to have multiple universes as the total energy of the universe would not be constant. If there were any connection between this universe and another, then again there would be only one universe. If there were only an intermittent connection between this universe and another, then the total energy of this universe would vary, and this would violate the first law of thermodynamics stated, "That the total energy of the universe is constant." There has never been an exception to this law, therefor there are no mutiple universes and Smolin's conjecture is false.