PistolPete38

I guess indigo children are not as known a phenomenon as I thought. Indigo children are said to be the most recent generation of humanity. They tend to be very bright, intuitive children that are also very non conformist. Here is a link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Indigo_Children

I was watching CSI last night, it was a show about a girl whose parents claimed she was an indigo child. She was very bright and gifted and showed a keen intuitive ability. I did a little research on the subject and most of what I found was a little out in left field. Some sites talked about auras and psychic abilities. Don't get me wrong, I believe in the potential of the human mind, I just dont think anyone who actually has such abilities is on every wednesday night on the sci fi channel or a phone call away. What i am asking is there any scientific evidence that indigo children actually exist or is it psuedo science.

My first question is basically does a vacuum work in space. For example: You are traveling through space and pass through a cloud of dust, could you take a sample of the dust cloud with a vacuum or would nothing happen? My second question involves sound in space. Now i know you can not hear sound in a vacuum but does a vacuum effect sound waves. For example: if a focused wave of sound designed to shatter stone on earth, would it work in space? Would there need to be changes to the wavelength for it to work in a vacuum? Any help to settle my curiosity would be appreciated .

Interesting, not really what i was hoping for but it helps. bigmoosie the graviton theory is interesting but how can a particle be massless, isnt that an oxymoron. Perhaps i am just dense tonight but i dont quite follow your explanation on how gravitons supposedly work. The way i see it it is like the chicken and the egg, you cant identify the mechanism of gravity without knowing how the mechanism works and vice versa. Another thing that confuses me is how gravity and centrifical force work similarly but opposite. Gravity will hold you to the surface of a spinning object such as the surface of earth while centrifical force you have to be inside the spinning object to maintain footing for example how some space stations will theoreticaly produce artificail gravity by having a section that spins. Both mechanisms produce the same general effect but oppositely. Does this make sense to anyone or am i way off here.

I got thinking the other day about gravity (dont ask me why, sometimes my mind goes off on tangents). I thought about high school science about how gravity works and realized i never got an explanation that satisfied me. I remember being told gravity is created by the mass of whatever body generates it, the greater the mass the greater the gravity. What i dont understand is how? Is it due to elecro-magnetic fields that they generate, the larger the mass the stronger the magnetic field? Any information you can provide would be appreciated.