michel123456

this post to lock your previous answer.

Handwaving. ...some kind of mysterious inertia. A force oriented from outside to the inside.

Here below 3 diagrams representing the same scaling at 3 different rates.

at this time they are 24 downloads for your pdf, that is something. No comment is something too. And exCited electron, not exited. ------------- my opinion is You should erase the title "Reason for metastable state discovered". I guess 23 of the 24 downloaders stopped exactly there. Maybe replacing with: "essay in establishing the cause of metastable blah blah blah..." (edit: even your "Establishing causality in nature again" is better) And "Nexstein" is not good either. IMHO.

My thoughts are that it is not QT and what am I doing here?

1. you don't ban someone for the reasons you enumerated. 2. you are attacking* someone that cannot defend himself. 3. you are underestimating the members of this forum. People who are not intelligent do not ramble on a scientific forum. * "someone incapable of delivering a single coherent, intelligent, interesting contribution to the forum": if you said that to me, I'd consider that as an insult.

Relativity is about... relativity. That means "relative to something", that 'something" is an observer in most of the case. From Wiki Special Relativity:, bolded mine

Bolded mine This is how I make sense of it: if I observe an object, say a planet, getting away from me at near the speed of light, I should observe its mass increasing. And reversely an observer on this planet should observe that the Earth is increasing in mass.

My thought is that Relativity is already a "kind of mathematics by the observer".

No open mind here. illuusio has been banned. No other comment.

I looked at the .pdf. How do you provide heat? I was thinking maybe earth was the cheapest: dig a hole and put your oven in it.

I saw that my post #201 was by-passed. If when distant objects gets carried away by expansion of space they are NOT considered traveling through space, Then recession "speed" is not a standard "speed" and that is the reason why this "speed" can overpass C. So I understand that this "speed" is a phenomenon of other nature than regular speed through space. Or do I understand nothing?

Could you post a picture of such an oven?

Polyurethane foam?

If you are driving with your car on the highway, and if every car around you , traveling in the same direction, in front of you & back, is accelerating at the same rate, i.e. they all pass through the same point at the same speed, then you will observe all cars receding from you.

You are quite negative. Something simpler then: distance.

We cannot observe the way we were yesterday to conclude that we changed metric in one night. Because our own past is not directly observable. But since we can see the past all around us, we should be able to discern something . J.Barbour's quote supposes that "all distances in the universe" changed at once (over night). But even if it was possible, we are unable to observe that happening at once: we observe everything with a gap in time. The farthest, the oldest.

The fabric of space.

gravity

Time

Yes, that's the metric expansion. Yes, exactly. "If all distances in the universe were doubled over night, nothing would tell us this had happened." (Julian Barbour-shape dynamics) You can if you have the ability to observe now the difference in expansion in the past.

I disagree. I firmly believe that we are still in the middle ages concerning a lot of stuff.

After discussing a lot in another thread, I wanted to post my POV about the metric expansion of space. Here below a sketch of what I think is happening: in short, when the metric of space is doubled, time doesn't change. Here we are: Leonardo's vitruvian man on the right is double in scale relative to the left one. If both are observers, they observe light travelling at constant velocity C, each one in their own metric. Both are observing the same thing, there is no absolute reference that says the left man is correct while the other is wrong. Both must be correct. So light is travelling at the same apparent velocity as observed locally by each one of them. And the result is shown here: while space is scaled, time is not. The dot arrives at the same time in the 2 images.