michel123456

i killed a thread once again. OK let's see I'd buy a SFN watch: that is a watch with relative time of my particular FOR: it ticks fast from 9.00 am to 5.00pm, and slower the rest of the time. Or a SFN wall watch with remote control.

Thanks. I finally found my old thread by other ways but it was not trivial. It would be easier to extend the time lapse of the "my content" list.

Hi Cap'n me again. How can i find a very old thread of mine? My search under "my content" stops at 04th of January 2011 (one year ago), is there a way I can increase that?

Wonderful example! It was beaten down to death when I presented it some time ago. I'll have to dig to find it. (edit: found it here) (parenthesis) the following is not an answer to the OP: there are 2 combined effects here, acceleration & delay. The example works because the cars didn't start at the same time at the stop light: the first car started, then the second say 1 sec. later, the third 2 sec. later and so on. Following the Big-Bang Theory, all "cars" started at the same time. The delay is only observational caused by the fact that Speed of Light is finite: we observe the "car" behind us as if it had started in the past. Then to explain expansion, the only thing you need is acceleration. There is no need for direction: all the "cars" may be moving "in a stream", in the same direction. (parenthesis closed) I'd like to hear the mainstream answer to the OP. Taking into account that _the receding galaxies we observe far away are galaxies in the past: they were receding from us. The objects near to us, that are in closest time, are not receding so much. _an observer placed upon a far away galaxy is also an observer in the past: he is supposed observing another universe closer to the CMBR and he cannot observe us because we are in his future.

You didn't notice post #5.

My suggestion includes benefits. If you don't want any you will be sanctified.

Now do you see Swansont why I insist over the difference between absolute and constant. immijimmi's post is a wonderful example. He wrote: IMHO the speed of light is constant because it is relative to your movement. Any observer, in any FOR will observe light traveling at speed of light. Even the observer traveling at 0,99999999C will observe light traveling at speed of light. It is like the donkey and the carrot. Is that correct?

Maybe "other" means "other way to make money". I have some suggestion but I want 10% over the benefits.

3^2 can be represented as if each dimension of space had 3 dimensions: length, width, height. But since the width of one dimension is the length or width of the other, it becomes redundant. And there is no need for curled up dimensions. Also you can create length by extending a point over time. You can create width & height the same way: a point along time. So that all spatial dimensions can be constructed by a single point extending over time, in 3 directions. Or 9 directions minus 6 redundant. Which products a spatial framework made from a point litterally exploding in time.

Here is a Greek almost unknown, the tourist may notice the small stele down the hill of the Acropolis "27th April 1941 the day of the entrance of the German troops in Athens Constantin Koukidis guard of the Greek flag at the Acropolis refusing to give the flag jumped from the holy rock wreathed in it first in the fight for resistance." It was a young boy alone in front of the german officers Jacobi and Elsnits. A few days before, the Greek Prime Minister Alexander Koryzis had commited suicide not willing to surrender.

what about this? from this article of Physicsworld.com

You should. For a moment I thought you spoke about Paley known for the watchmaker analogy, and I was terribly confused. Thanks to your last answer, now I am not confused about Pauli, I am simply confused about the rest. I guess when you talk about "the big bounce or if you will the big inflation" you mean the Big Bang.

Ah. Pauli.

Wonderful site. (I had a look here also) I'll have to check on my bookshelves for more examples. The fact is: you cannot believe your eyes. But as Mathematic wrote But but it may be some other kind of mother nature's trick. ------------------ For optical illusions, see the website of Jacques Ninio, author of "The science of illusions" 1998-2004 (the book on my shelf), have a look at the Illustration supplement (pdf) Jacques Ninio is biologist director of research at CNRS (France).

Who is Powley?

That was exactly after the invention of marriage.

In the wiki new years article there is no direct connection with solstice. But there is a connection with Christmas in the wiki solstice article And about Hogmanay (Scotland) So a tradition that was ment to happen on December 22 instead of December 25, was moved on December 31 to match one that was originally celebrated on March 25. It's a mess. It will be a delice for archeologists and historians of the future thousand years examining our current civilisation.

Oho, seriously now 9+1 Is that 3^2 dim of space + 1 of time?

What is "other" ? Another -yes or -no upon the perpendicular line of imaginery answers?

Because there are 9 letters in the word classical ?

Why is the New Year not celebrated exactly on the winter solstice 21st of December but ten days after?

Everything would balance out but change appears over time (sounds like tautology). One can observe the change under the condition to be able to look in the past. And we do.

Duda I went back to your other thread in which you posted a link to this thought provocative paper from Mark J Hadley Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK Inadvertently I quoted it in the other thread, I'll do it again here. The best part from it IMHO is Everything is relative! Even the arrow of time, why not, indeed? The whole problem of the faith of the universe arises when we consider the observations we get from the outside world as absolute. Maybe there is no absolute expanding Universe, but we are observing an expanding universe relative to us. Relative must be the key. I can imagine some E.T. made of anti-matter and asking himself why the arrow of time is going this way and not the other and why entropy is always pointing in this direction, all of which are so well mirrored to him that the result is exactly the same: to him, we are the ones made of anti-matter, we are the weird ones because everything is relative.

Great paper. Thanks. The best part from your link IMHO is Everything is relative! Even the arrow of time, why not, indeed?

The Hubble sphere changes over time. see Hubble limit from wiki. Bolded mine. It corresponds to md65536's post. The point is that the telescope must interact by some way with us by sending its pictures, and the max. theoretical speed to do that is the Speed Of Light. So, even if we could have sent this telescope with a spaceship traveling at SOL 10 LY away and take the pictures back at SOL, the pictures would show something that is still in Earth's past light-cone which means it was theoretically observable from Earth 10 years ago. There is no physical way to gather information from outside our past light-cone. What would change is the parallax Note: I have never seen anywhere any observational evidence corroborating the bolded part, that "at a later time, some objects within the Hubble limit no longer will be observed (by us) as they are today." Are objects vanishing from our telescopes over time?