michel123456

From the wiki page, I understand that the equatorial radius is squared. In your formula you have squared the polar radius.

Impatients. Why are you all attacking Anilkumar before he posts his hypothesis. He wrote Let's wait.

http://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/hollow/morrow.htm

The result as seen in the video doesn't look like a wave propagation. It would be interesting to observe a double slit experiment that way.

That's a problem. A society that is an island of wealth will be considered as guilty of injustice as regarded from the rest of the world. You'll be obliged to create a mighty army to defend your island from jealousy. And it is history rewinded.

paraphrasing: is there a physics test(s) that can determine if something is dead?

A better society where? In the whole world? or only in the already privileged countries?

It is not twice the speed of light. It is the speed of light squared.

I suppose it is a bad interpretation (or exaggeration) of this sentence

Thank you. I asked for Schrödinger's answer.

When i first saw the equation E=MR in the OP, i thought hmmm. Then I say bof. The R factor replaces C^2 from the famous E=MC^2. Thus R is a constant. R has unities m^2 by s^2. These are square meters divided by square seconds. m^2/s^2 What is that? Let"s make some unconventional try: try A. _Square meters divided by seconds is a unit representing how fast a painter makes his work : painting how many square meters of wall by seconds. But we must divide again this quantity by seconds, becoming: painting how many square meters of wall by seconds by seconds. And here I am lost. What is this? An accelerated painter? Why is it a constant? What the hell has a painter anything to do with E=MC^2? So I abandon try A. try B. _Meters divided by seconds represents velocity. Meters divided by seconds by seconds is acceleration. That's great we are progressing. We are missing some meters: what we need is acceleration times meters.(m/s^2) m = m^2/s^2 We can put that in graph: acceleration along X axis, meters along Y axis, and the whole surface of the diagram is R. We got a surface which is a constant R=C^2 But then again, what is this surface? One step back: until Meters divided by seconds by seconds is acceleration it was O.K..(m/s^2) Because we know that an accelerated mass produces a force, it makes some sense compairing to the original E=MC^2 although missing something. Then the question resumes to the last point, when we multiply this acceleration by meters. The questions are: why multiply an acceleration by meters, and why the hell is it a constant? That's what I expected from the OP with its E=MR

I agree on that.

I saw nothing about North Korea. Mr G. Lu on his own allegation writes: I found such an institute at Heifei, People's Republic of China. Prof. E.P. Kundig is in Geneva. The paper (the source of the debate)

How long lives a salamander?

Damn, i'll have to work for another 900 years at least.

But Newts speaks about radius, not about perimeter.

Did I say that? There are a number of ways you can say your opinion. I disagree on the way you have chosen. It's getting out of tracks. Next time I'll vote negative.

Is this comment for me or for J. Baez?

I don't think that's the point. The US military budget for 2010 was roughly 680 Billion.(source Wikipedia) The point is to split the budget: 340 billions for defence & warfare, 340 billions for help. America will not have to afford overcharge, it is a question of repartition of the investment. If I understand correctly the UN suggestions.

Right. A former minister here , in 2008, after being caught for tax evasion under the cover of an off-shore company, once said the historical (since then) "if it is legal, it is ethical". That was not well received, his career was ruined, he is currently under prosecution (for other reasons).

If you draw a circle on the curved surface of a sphere, it will remain a circle. If you draw a square on a sphere, it will not remain exactly a square because the sides will be curved. A circle inscribed into this square will have a curved radius: the radius will follow the curve of the sphere. Some other geometer will tell you what happen to Pi in this case, but intuitively I think you can make a configuration where Pi=3.

? that sounds like a maffia aphorism, or what?

I think the most important thing to be self sustainable is a woman.

Yes, that is what I think. I whish it could be provable: that would be a good start.