michel123456

The good thing for us Greek is that we realize politicians are unreliable elsewhere too. ------------- The joke here is that we will send Greek politicians to help the Brits. Next steps after the referendum is Cameron staying in place, strengthen of the relation with Europe, the entering of G.B. in the Euro zone, elections and Cameron wins again. ______________ As a side note, the difference between the Grexit and the Brexit is that the Grexit is about leaving the Euro zone, not leaving Europe. Here the "leave Europe" movement is solely supported by very few comunists and maybe some extreme right skinheads.

Excellent. I will begin to sell mine, on the black market of course. In this case, they are 52 fools that jumped off the cliff. They were tied with a rope to another 48 who didn't want to jump. At this moment, they are a hundred falling. The 48 are screaming of fear to die. I see that many of the 51 are screaming, realizing suddenly that it was not a joke. N. Farage is happy.

Haha, he may already signed it....

Worse. The city of London will ask for independence. The tribe of the Angles will remain around alone.

To me arrogance is to blame. European arrogance. Bureaucratic arrogance, people telling you constantly what to do, when and where. People who are constantly right: it is an error. And especially when the "right thing to do" is something you don't like. We put the blame on the British citizens. I like to do that too. But at the same time, the europeans in charge (Mr Juncker, Schultz, Dijselbloem & others) should take a step back and ask themselves "what have we done wrong?". And Mr Schauble too.

This is the worse: http://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/british-lose-right-to-claim-that-americans-are-dumber You mean, after a war?

Yes Farage has a plan to make the cars drive on the right side of the road. There will be a test for 3 months until the departure of Cameron. If the test is a success the measure will count for trucks too.

Not how, but what happens. We have seen that in Europe. When you try to erase the nation borders, you do not unite people together. In fact you go to the next smaller border. In Europe it is called "regions". And if you erase the borders of the regions, you will finally reach the border of the villages. It is so disappointing...

You are correct. I am pretty sure the question to the British will be slightly different next time. If the British people is there because I have the slight impression that only the English will be asked.

Nothing of what you are proposing in your excuse is in the agenda and will happen. If you vote no, it is NO. After that you must support the consequences. The bad thing about democracy is that the millions that voted Yes will have to support the consequences too. ------------------ As a side note, if you voted No meaning Yes, you should ask yourself about senility.

No, Mont Chimborazo wins. http://www.universetoday.com/15025/highest-place-on-earth/

Collateral damage: the Greek stock market is collapsing today.

Now the gesture in your avatar is adequate. --------------- I suppose the new PM will be from the same party as Cameron. Otherwise you need elections. Καλό ξεμπέρδεμα.

Hmmm. The Brits will suffer I am afraid. Quoting "I-do-not-remember-who-was-the-economic-guru" at the beginning of the Greek crisis back in 2009: there will be blood.

Remember successive referendums in Ireland about the Treaty of Lisbon. First NO (2008), a year after YES (2009) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty-eighth_Amendment_of_the_Constitution_Bill_2008_(Ireland) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty-eighth_Amendment_of_the_Constitution_of_Ireland Exactly. It is on purpose. The new one will make a mess out of it.

You don't have to apologize. You have to think about the rules of democracy and the rules of economics. I am afraid you will feel the strength of economics against democracy more than ever. I am pretty sure a second referendum will be organized with some clever excuse, and the result will be different. In some months from now. It was a referendum, not an election. He has not to leave, he is leaving because it is going to be a mess and he doesn't want to be part of it.

Question: The British debt, is it counted in pounds or in dollars? I mean, when the Sterling goes down, what about the debt?

I like that.

I understand nothing. SOL has a single value depending on the medium. For void, SOL is c. For light, it is not only a maximum, it is also a minimum: it is The speed, there is no other. It is a constant. A massive particle has not the same requirement to travel at a specific speed. A massive particle can travel at any speed it pleases. In fact it depends solely on the relative velocities with the different observers. If there are 100 observers traveling at 100 different velocities, each one of them will observe the same particle traveling at a different speed. Now, Einstein tells us that if the particle is massless (a photon), the 100 observers will all measure the same particle traveling at the same speed. That is because for the 100 observers, time & space will change differently and give the same result to each observer. My understanding of this is that in fact, the time-space transformation is an observational phenomenon

Well one cannot consider at the same time that salinity is increasing and that salinity is stable. These are two mutually exclusive. Most of the sites I have read are proposing that salinity has increased over the times. The problem to that point is that it gives a clock that provides arguments to the young earth creationists. I found this site which is so trouble to me which side is supporting but nevertheless with interesting stuff Where I read And exactly after these statements, I read the following Equilibrium sounds good to me. It means salinity is stable over time. It also means that the statement "Over millions of years this has been concentrated in the oceans (as it has nowhere else to go)" is inaccurate.

The rivers carry salt in the oceans? Are the rivers salty?

That is after the metal has been extracted from the ore.

No this man claimed to be 197 years old, while the authorities already celebrated his 200 anniversary (but he forgot about it). To me the most probable is a fake identity. That would have help him selling his medicines.

I'd call that knowledge based on experience.

Fire must have look like a magical thing or divine or sent by some sort of hell. There must have been a lot of rituals around fire. The ability of fire to transform materials must have been seen as a magical trick. After that I don't know if they are evidences of some sort but I imagine someone playing with fire putting in it all kind of things and observing the results. Using these results as ornaments first (I don't think copper is strong enough for making any weapon). Maybe gold was discovered rather quickly. Iron must have come much later (see iron age)