michel123456

Yes. even Google itself is redirected to the country you live in. The same search from Google, Google.fr, Google.be or Google.gr will give different results This below example for the word "plan" https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=plan https://www.google.fr/#q=plan https://www.google.be/#q=plan https://www.google.gr/#q=plan The 2,530,000,000 number of results is the same, So i guess the sorting only is different.

Surprisingly no mention of Beau Brummell in the article.

When an electric car is plugged in, it consums electric energy that was produced by fossil fuel at 84% on the average in the US. Also, I remember at a presentation about making economies in energy, some official in the panel saying that the loss of electric energy between production and consumption (transmission and distribution losses), around 70%! I am still unable to check that huge factor, info over the internet varies from 6% to wathever you want. from the below links http://electrical-engineering-portal.com/total-losses-in-power-distribution-and-transmission-lines-1 http://electrical-engineering-portal.com/total-losses-in-power-distribution-and-transmission-lines-2 Which are all numbers that do not match each other, anyway there is a non negligeable loss. which means that an electrical car is "green" only by the mean that it does not pollute directly in the city. But co2 is elsewhere. It has not disappeared. The same goes for trains, tramways, trolleybus. It works only when the production of elecricity itself will become green.

It looks like Buddhism without the need of any other universe. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rebirth_%28Buddhism%29 If you insert the idea of multi universes, then it gets more complicated, but essentially the same. If I understand your premise correctly.

It looks like related to culture. From what I have learned, British choose their clothing mostly on the basis of feeling comfortable. Latins choose their clothes on the basis of the look. I may be wrong on this... Anyway nobody wants tomato sauce or mayonnaise on a tie. Maybe that's the reason of a tie: the ability of eating properly. ---------------- As a side-note In some countries mayonnaise is registered, there is a specific receipt with eggs. When you buy mayonaise (with a single letter M), then the receipt is surely different (no eggs inside).

This is turning so british and out of the OP Things are worrying for Robbitybob1. Not only he typed a word he didn't know but he didn't remember it. From his info he is 61, that is early for that kind of things. So I was wondering: was there any grandchildren or nephew at home? Was that a joke? Or does anyone want to drive him crazy?

The mood is no tie at all http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2015/feb/04/give-the-man-a-tie-new-greek-govt-shakes-up/ ------------------------- Anyway this is all wrong. You don't make a judgment on someone on the basis of his tie but on his shoes.

My impression is that a lot of people argue that they understand Relativity although they don't. The Internet is full of "explanations" that explain nothing, adding confusion to the innocent mind. I have even seen strong arguments raised between people who both believe they understand Relativity ending with insults on both sides. As I posted before, to me, Relativity is a Theory of observation. Relativity describes rather accurately what an observer will observe and measure, and how one observation can be transformed into another for another observer. That's it. When this Theory is used to describe the Universe, I don't know.

It looks like the 3 blank spaces at the end of the link do matter.

Because he used a word he knew nothing about? Definitely, it is a miracle.

I found very few information about it. the most meaningful being this excerpt below, from this site http://www.quora.com/What-is-the-rainbow-gravity-theory-in-laymans-terms (which is not the best information source) Till today I had never heard of "rainbow Gravity". There are few youtube videos (not reliable by definition) and no mention found in Wikipedia although being around for about a decade. What about it? And why is it not accepted? Thanks

That's a bang

because it was a mistake or a miracle

The Beatles.... ------------- Oops, that was Liverpool

Mancunian? I learned something today. I didn't know cotton was cultivated around Manchester. --------------- Anyway, serious now: Cotton is the material of the clouds. Silk is the material of worm holes Spacetime is synthetic.

I still don't undrstand. Inside a specific orbit, let's say there is a random distribution of mass. IIRC Newton showed that all this mass put here and there essentially corresponds to a mass concentrated at a single point at the centre of mass of the orbit. This point should be around (somewhere) the centre of the galaxy. Or am I wrong somewhere?

That's how I like Strangeness. That is what I don't understand. Kepler's law remains Kepler's law, no matter how much mass is involved. Even with a huge amount of mass, according to Kepler the velocity must decrease with radius. When observation contradicts what is expected, the only thing that can fix things is a new law, not new mass.

Yes. Time decreases (or increases, it depends how you measure it) as a direct function of distance: an object seen from a distance is seen in the past in direct proportion to distance. While gravity decreases in function of the distance squared. So they cannot be the same thing. ---------------- But if one multiplies length by time, maybe he gets closer to the same thing. (or have I mixed up the units??)

I wonder what the standard physics have to say about that. I suppose tweed as it is more anglo-saxon. The universe cannot be of asiatic silk.

You mean the central mass "of observed matter + dark matter"

The fourth dimension is considered to be Time. One should first establish a direct and indestructible link between Time and Gravity. I suppose that is not difficult for you, AJB

Yes. But Strange posted twice that Kepler's law is irrelevant. And that is wrong. And knowing the level of Strange, he could not possibly ignore it. IOW I accuse him of lying. And I accuse all the other staff ignoring his "mistake" on purpose. Guilty. All of you. (Sorry for Bignose who felt insulted alone) Prove me wrong and I will apologise.

Yes, I support Moon's suggestion. There exist psychologists specialized in child with difficult behaviour. You are not alone. It can turn bad (very bad). You should go quickly.

Fabric.

I don't think so. Kepler's law is the basis of the search for Dark Matter From http://www.darkmatterphysics.com/Galactic-rotation-curves-of-spiral-galaxies.htm enhancing mine