Garry Denke

Here is the red tape that is currently holding up the recharging of Earth's magnetic field as it continues its decrease toward Tesla zero. On 26th July 2005 the Planning and Regulatory Panel of Salisbury District Council refused English Heritage's application for excavation and removal of A-344 road beside Heelstone: http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/server/show/ConWebDoc.5437 English Heritage's application, approved by the Northern Area Committee of Salisbury District Council at its meeting of 19th July 2005, was refused by the Planning and Regulatory Panel of Salisbury District Council on 26th July 2005, because it did not provide for excavating and removing the Heelstone artifacts: http://www.geocities.com/garrydenke 1) brass altar (5c-5c-3c) 2) gold ark (2.5c-1.5c-1.5c) 3) gold table (2c-1c-1.5c) 4) gold altar (1c-1c-2c) 5) gold candlestick 6) gold breastplate 7) gold ephod 8) gold censer 9) brass laver http://www.garrydenke.com/seismic.htm 1) A-A' (1979) C91 quadrant bearing; N 73 E 2) B-B' (1953) C36 quadrant bearing; S 67 E 3) C-C' (1923) C6 quadrant bearing; S 57 E 4) D-D' (1923) C6 quadrant bearing; South 5) E-E' (1923) C6 quadrant bearing; S 50 E 6) F-F' (1923) C6 quadrant bearings; S 2 W - S 22 E 7) G-G' (1923) C6 quadrant bearing; S 50 E 8) H-H' (1956) C51 quadrant bearing; S 63 E 9) I-I' (1979) C91 quadrant bearings; S 71 E - S 34 E - S 71 E / S 71 E http://www.salisbury.gov.uk/council/contact English Heritage was very surprised, and disappointed, by Salisbury District Council's decision, but they now know the grounds for refusal are ones which can easily be resolved when English Heritage submits the amended scheme providing for the excavation and removal of the Heelstone artifacts and A-344 road. http://www.gnn.gov.uk/content/detail.asp?NewsAreaID=2&ReleaseID=175616 The review will be taken forward by a steering group consisting of representatives from: the Department for Transport; the Department for Culture, Media and Sport; the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs; the Highways Agency; the Government Office for the South West; and statutory advisers.

Abstract: hbar=e^2/e0c hbar=[1.6021765(31) x 10^-19 A-s]^2/[8.854187817... x 10^-12 A^2-s^4/kg-m^3-sr][2.99792458 x 10^8 m/s] hbar=[2.5669696(36) x 10^-38 A^2-s^2]/[2.6544187(29) x 10^-3 A^2-s^3/kg-m^2-sr] hbar=[9.6705527(59) x 10^-36 kg-m^2-sr/s] Introduction: Planck constant: h = 6.6260693(11) x 10^-34 kg-m^2/s speed of light in vacuum: c = 2.99792458 x 10^8 m/s Newtonian constant: G = 6.6723635(22) x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2 Boltzmann constant: k = 1.3806504(11) x 10^-23 kg-m^2/s^2-K elementary charge: e = 1.6021765(31) x 10^-19 A-s electric constant: e0 = 8.854187817... x 10^-12 A^2-s^4/kg-m^3-sr molar mass: M = 3.2858629(47) x 10^19 kg/kmol dielectric constant: ke = 1.4594705(10) x 10^-2 sr fine-structure constant: a = 7.2973525(68) x 10^-3 rad Derivation: 1) temperature: [(hc^5/G)^1/2]/k = 3.5518626(92) x 10^32 K 2) electric current: e/[(hG/c^5)^1/2] = 1.1857531(48) x 10^24 A 3) dielectric constant: e^2/(e0hc) = 1.4594705(14) x 10^-2 sr 4) fine-structure constant: e^2/(2e0hc) = 7.2973525(68) x 10^-3 rad 5) mass: (hc/G)^1/2 = 5.4563031(18) x 10^-8 kg 6) amount of substance: [(hc/G)^1/2]/M = 1.6605388(62) x 10^-27 kmol 7) length: (hG/c^3)^1/2 = 4.0507625(15) x 10^-35 m 8) luminous intensity: [(hG/c^5)^1/2]/ke = 9.2580762(94) x 10^-42 cd 9) time: (hG/c^5)^1/2 = 1.3511889(33) x 10^-43 s Conclusion: 001) radiance = 1.5154964(57) x 10^123 kg/s^3-sr 002) irradiance = 2.2118223(93) x 10^121 kg/s^3 003) radiant density = 7.3778453(51) x 10^112 kg/m-s^2 004) density = 1.5044912(03) x 10^103 /m^3 005) mass density = 8.2089600(41) x 10^95 kg/m^3 006) i. luminous efficacy = 2.6860106(85) x 10^95 kg-m^2/cd-sr-s^3 007) electric current density = 7.2263787(71) x 10^92 A/m^2 008) thermal transfer = 6.2272181(80) x 10^88 kg/s^3-K 009) electric charge density = 2.4104604(96) x 10^84 A-s/m^3 010) angular acceleration = 3.9969910(02) x 10^83 rad/s^2 011) surface tension = 2.9885899(39) x 10^78 kg/s^2 012) molar concentration = 2.4982661(10) x 10^76 kmol/m^3 013) dynamic viscosity = 9.9688629(88) x 10^69 kg/m-s 014) inverse area = 6.0943365(69) x 10^68 /m^2 015) electric field strength = 7.5560138(75) x 10^62 kg-m/A-s^3 016) surface density = 3.3252547(62) x 10^61 kg/m^2 017) absorbed dose rate = 6.6515877(76) x 10^59 m^2/s^3 018) magnetic field strength = 2.9272344(25) x 10^58 A/m 019) thermal conductivity = 2.5224981(98) x 10^54 kg-m/s^3-K 020) magnetic flux density = 2.5204149(31) x 10^54 kg/A-s^2 021) radiant intensity = 2.4867291(78) x 10^54 kg-m^2/s^3-sr 022) power = 3.6293079(12) x 10^52 kg-m^2/s^3 023) field acceleration = 2.2187308(58) x 10^51 m/s^2 024) electric flux density = 9.7642030(22) x 10^49 A-s/m^2 025) force = 1.2106068(10) x 10^44 kg-m/s^2 026) frequency = 7.4008895(10) x 10^42 /s 027) surface concentration = 1.0119882(71) x 10^42 kmol/m^2 028) inverse luminous intensity = 1.0801379(99) x 10^41 /cd 029) angular velocity = 5.4006900(07) x 10^40 rad/s 030) molar energy = 2.9531863(41) x 10^36 kg-m^2/s^2-kmol 031) mass flow rate = 4.0381496(51) x 10^35 kg/s 032) wave number = 2.4686710(13) x 10^34 /m 033) temperature = 3.5518626(92) x 10^32 K 034) electric conductivity = 9.5637447(08) x 10^29 A^2-s^3/kg-m^3 035) electric potential = 3.0607617(77) x 10^28 kg-m^2/A-s^3 036) luminance = 5.6421832(93) x 10^27 cd/m^2 037) mass field = 1.3469817(34) x 10^27 kg/m 038) Avogadro constant = 6.0221415(04) x 10^26 /kmol 039) luminous flux density = 8.2346001(27) x 10^25 cd-sr/m^2 040) electric current = 1.1857531(48) x 10^24 A 041) thermal conductance = 1.0218041(14) x 10^20 kg-m^2/s^3-K 042) magnetic potential = 1.0209602(33) x 10^20 kg-m/A-s^2 043) molar mass = 3.2858629(47) x 10^19 kg/kmol 044) displacement = 4.4930474(34) x 10^18 kg-s/m^2 045) luminous density = 2.7467669(40) x 10^17 cd-sr-s/m^3 046) absorbed dose = 8.987551787… x 10^16 m^2/s^2 047) electric displacement = 3.9552467(59) x 10^15 A-s/m 048) Josephson quantum = 4.8359787(85) x 10^14 A-s^2-sr/kg-m^2-rad 049) Josephson constant = 2.4179893(93) x 10^14 A-s^2/kg-m^2 050) Coulomb constant = 7.7384850(15) x 10^12 kg-m^3/A^2-s^4 051) energy = 4.9038806(85) x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2 052) speed of light in vacuum = 2.99792458 x 10^8 m/s 053) Faraday constant = 9.6485337(83) x 10^7 A-s/kmol 054) inverse mass = 1.8327427(53) x 10^7 /kg 055) von Klitzing constant = 2.5812807(51) x 10^4 kg-m^2/A^2-s^3 056) i. conductance q. = 1.2906403(76) x 10^4 kg-m^2-rad/A^2-s^3-sr 057) molar gas constant = 8.3144721(42) x 10^3 kg-m^2/s^2-kmol-K 058) impedance of vacuum = 3.767303134… x 10^2 kg-m^2-sr/A^2-s^3 059) inverse fine-structure constant = 1.3703599(91) x 10^2 /rad 060) relative permeability = 6.8517999(54) x 10^1 /sr 061) momentum = 1.6357585(24) x 10^1 kg-m/s 062) spin two = 2.0000000 x 10^0 sr/rad 063) spin one = 1.0000000 x 10^0 rad/rad, sr/sr 064) spin one-half = 5.0000000 x 10^-1 rad/sr 065) dielectric constant = 1.4594705(14) x 10^-2 sr 066) second radiation = 1.4387752(25) x 10^-2 m-K 067) fine-structure constant = 7.2973525(68) x 10^-3 rad 068) magnetic permeability = 8.6102257(82) x 10^-5 kg-m/A^2-s^2 069) conductance q. = 7.7480917(13) x 10^-5 A^2-s^3-sr/kg-m^2-rad 070) electric conductance = 3.8740458(57) x 10^-5 A^2-s^3/kg-m^2 071) magnetic constant = 1.256637061... x 10^-6 kg-m-sr/A^2-s^2 072) molar Planck constant = 3.9903127(01) x 10^-7 kg-m^2/s-kmol 073) mass = 5.4563031(18) x 10^-8 kg 074) radiant distribution = 3.335640952... x 10^-9 s/m 075) Stefan-Boltzmann constant = 1.3897144(61) x 10^-9 kg/s^3-K^4 076) density of states = 2.0392013(27) x 10^-10 s^2/kg-m^2 077) Newtonian constant = 6.6723635(22) x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2 078) magnetic pole strength = 4.8032044(04) x 10^-11 A-m 079) electric constant = 8.854187817... x 10^-12 A^2-s^4/kg-m^3-sr 080) magnetic exposure = 2.9363774(27) x 10^-12 A-s/kg 081) electric permittivity = 1.2922426(01) x 10^-13 A^2-s^4/kg-m^3 082) magnetic flux = 4.1356674(39) x 10^-15 kg-m^2/A-s^2 083) magnetic flux q. = 2.0678337(20) x 10^-15 kg-m^2-rad/A-s^2-sr 084) specific heat = 2.5303770(36) x 10^-16 m^2/s^2-K 085) first radiation = 1.1910428(22) x 10^-16 kg-m^4-sr/s^3-rad 086) radiation = 5.9552141(09) x 10^-17 kg-m^4/s^3 087) elementary charge = 1.6021765(31) x 10^-19 A-s 088) molality = 3.0433405(66) x 10^-20 kmol/kg 089) thermal resistance = 9.7866116(02) x 10^-21 s^3-K/kg-m^2 090) Boltzmann constant = 1.3806504(11) x 10^-23 kg-m^2/s^2-K 091) inverse electric current = 8.4334585(30) x 10^-25 /A 092) kinematic viscosity = 1.2143880(51) x 10^-26 m^2/s 093) amount of substance = 1.6605388(62) x 10^-27 kmol 094) electric resistivity = 1.0456155(31) x 10^-30 kg-m^3/A^2-s^3 095) relative expansion = 2.8154241(50) x 10^-33 /K 096) Planck constant = 6.6260693(11) x 10^-34 kg-m^2/s 097) length = 4.0507625(15) x 10^-35 m 098) reduced Planck constant = 9.6705527(59) x 10^-36 kg-m^2-sr/s 099) absorption-emission = 2.4763817(25) x 10^-36 s/kg 100) inductance = 3.4877979(84) x 10^-39 kg-m^2/A^2-s^2 101) luminous intensity = 9.2580762(94) x 10^-42 cd 102) moment = 2.2102188(14) x 10^-42 kg-m 103) luminous flux = 1.3511889(33) x 10^-43 cd-sr 104) time = 1.3511889(33) x 10^-43 s 105) magnetic moment = 1.9456640(35) x 10^-45 A-m^2 106) capacitance = 5.234567901... x 10^-48 A^2-s^4/kg-m^2 107) electric moment = 6.4900366(34) x 10^-54 A-s-m 108) area = 1.6408676(95) x 10^-69 m^2 109) fluidity = 1.0031234(27) x 10^-70 m-s/kg 110) inertial moment = 8.9530715(22) x 10^-77 kg-m^2 111) molar volume = 4.0027761(50) x 10^-77 m^3/kmol 112) electric charge volume = 4.1485848(93) x 10^-85 m^3/A-s 113) luminous energy = 1.8257115(33) x 10^-86 cd-sr-s 114) electric current volume = 1.3838189(66) x 10^-93 m^2/A 115) luminous efficacy = 3.7229933(79) x 10^-96 cd-sr-s^3/kg-m^2 116) mass volume = 1.2181811(03) x 10^-96 m^3/kg 117) volume = 6.6467653(52) x 10^-104 m^3 118) radiant volume = 1.3554092(73) x 10^-113 m-s^2/kg 119) inverse irradiance = 4.5211586(75) x 10^-122 s^3/kg 120) inverse radiance = 6.5984977(75) x 10^-124 s^3-sr/kg Bibliography: http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/

Mars Odyssey Themis Images May 23-27, 2005 Meridiani (Released 23 May 2005) http://themis.la.asu.edu/zoom-20050523a.html More Meridiani (Released 24 May 2005) http://themis.la.asu.edu/zoom-20050524a.html Elysium Mons (Released 25 May 2005) http://themis.la.asu.edu/zoom-20050525a.html Cratered Acidalia Planitia (Released 26 May 2005) http://themis.la.asu.edu/zoom-20050526a.html Acidalia Planitia Channel Margin (Released 27 May 2005) http://themis.la.asu.edu/zoom-20050527a.html All the THEMIS images archived here: http://themis.la.asu.edu/latest.html NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory manages the 2001 Mars Odyssey mission for NASA's Office of Space Science, Washington, D.C. The Thermal Emission Imaging System (THEMIS) was developed by Arizona State University, Tempe, in collaboration with Raytheon Santa Barbara Remote Sensing. The THEMIS investigation is led by Dr. Philip Christensen at Arizona State University. Lockheed Martin Astronautics, Denver, is the prime contractor for the Odyssey project, and developed and built the orbiter. Mission operations are conducted jointly from Lockheed Martin and from JPL, a division of the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena. Garry Denke http://www.asu.edu/

Making sure this had the right terminology.Einstein's nine (9) primary fundamental universal base unit values 1) Einstein intensity: [(hG/c^5)^1/2]/sr = 9.8601020(30) x 10^-46 cd 2) Einstein time: (hG/c^5)^1/2 = 1.3511889(33) x 10^-43 s 3) Einstein length: (hG/c^3)^1/2 = 4.0507625(15) x 10^-35 m 4) Einstein substance: [(hc/G)^1/2]/M = 1.6605388(62) x 10^-27 kmol 5) Einstein mass: (hc/G)^1/2 = 5.4563031(18) x 10^-8 kg 6) Einstein current: e/[(hG/c^5)^1/2] = 1.1857531(48) x 10^24 A 7) Einstein temperature: [(hc^5/G)^1/2]/k = 3.5518626(92) x 10^32 K 8) Einstein relative permeability: (e0hc)/e^2 = 6.8517999(55) x 10^1 rad 9) Einstein inverse fine-structure: (2e0hc)/e^2 = 1.3703599(91) x 10^2 sr Planck's non-primary fundamental non-universal base unit values 1) Planck intensity: [(bar-hG/c^5)^1/2]/sr = 3.9336115(89) x 10^-46 cd 2) Planck time: (bar-hG/c^5)^1/2 = 5.3904639(43) x 10^-44 s 3) Planck length: (bar-hG/c^3)^1/2 = 1.6160204(35) x 10^-35 m 4) Planck substance: [(bar-hc/G)^1/2]/M = 6.6245916(02) x 10^-28 kmol 5) Planck mass: (bar-hc/G)^1/2 = 2.1767500(08) x 10^-8 kg 6) Planck current: e/[(bar-hG/c^5)^1/2] = 2.9722423(67) x 10^24 A 7) Planck temperature: [(bar-hc^5/G)^1/2]/k = 1.4169882(01) x 10^32 K Legend's http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/ Planck constant: h = 6.6260693(11) x 10^-34 kg-m^2/s Newton constant: G = 6.6723635(22) x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2 speed of light in vacuum: c = 2.99792458 x 10^8 m/s Einstein molar mass: M = 3.2858629(47) x 10^19 kg/kmol elementary charge: e = 1.6021765(31) x 10^-19 A-s Boltzmann constant: k = 1.3806504(11) x 10^-23 kg-m^2/s^2-K electric constant: e0 = 8.854187817... x 10^-12 A^2-s^4-rad/kg-m^3 Planck h/2(pi): bar-h = 1.0545716(84) x 10^-34 kg-m^2/s Thanks for helping 5614, Garry Denke

Yes, about half an hour ago.Boltzmann has 2n's, not 1n. Thanks for helping, Garry Denke

According to Max Planck : Planck's seven (7) primary universal base unit values 1) Planck intensity : (bar-hG/c^5)^1/2/sr = 7.8672231(80) x 10^-46 cd 2) Planck time : (bar-hG/c^5)^1/2 = 5.3904639(43) x 10^-44 s 3) Planck length : (bar-hG/c^3)^1/2 = 1.6160204(35) x 10^-35 m 4) Planck substance : (bar-hc/G)^1/2/M = 6.6245916(02) x 10^-28 kmol 5) Planck mass : (bar-hc/G)^1/2 = 2.1767500(08) x 10^-8 kg 6) Planck current : e/(bar-hG/c^5)^1/2 = 2.9722423(67) x 10^24 A 7) Planck temperature : (bar-hc^5/G)^1/2/k = 1.4169882(01) x 10^32 K According to Albert Einstein : Einstein's seven (7) primary universal base unit values 1) Einstein intensity : (hG/c^5)^1/2/sr = 1.9720204(06) x 10^-45 cd 2) Einstein time : (hG/c^5)^1/2 = 1.3511889(33) x 10^-43 s 3) Einstein length : (hG/c^3)^1/2 = 4.0507625(15) x 10^-35 m 4) Einstein substance : (hc/G)^1/2/M = 1.6605388(62) x 10^-27 kmol 5) Einstein mass : (hc/G)^1/2 = 5.4563031(18) x 10^-8 kg 6) Einstein current : e/(hG/c^5)^1/2 = 1.1857531(48) x 10^24 A 7) Einstein temperature : (hc^5/G)^1/2/k = 3.5518626(92) x 10^32 K According to Planck & Einstein : Planck & Einstein two (2) primary universal base angles 1) Einstein relative permeability : steradian = 6.8517999(55) x 10^1 sr 2) Planck inverse fine-structure : radian = 1.3703599(91) x 10^2 rad According to Einstein & Planck : http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/ Planck h/2pi : bar-h = 1.0545716(84) x 10^-34 kg-m^2/s Planck constant : h = 6.6260693(11) x 10^-34 kg-m^2/s Boltzmann constant : k = 1.3806504(11) x 10^-23 kg-m^2/s^2-K Coulomb elementary charge : e = 1.6021765(31) x 10^-19 A-s Newton constant : G = 6.6723635(22) x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2 Einstein relative permeability : steradian = 6.8517999(55) x 10^1 sr Einstein speed of light in vacuum : c = 2.99792458 x 10^8 m/s Avogadro molar mass : M = 3.2858629(47) x 10^19 kg/kmol Question #1 : Who is Ludwig Boltzmann? Question #2 : Who is Charles Coulomb? Question #3 : Who is Amadeo Avogadro? Thanks for helping, Garry Denke

There is No fourth Posthole at 'A' Cross-sections Quadrant bearings -------------------------------- http://www.geocities.com/garrydenke/MAP_12.5percent.gif http://www.geocities.com/garrydenke/CenterMAP_25percent.gif http://www.geocities.com/garrydenke/MAP_25percent.gif http://www.geocities.com/garrydenke/CenterMAP_50percent.gif Round the Heelstone clockwise Start 12:00 o'clock ------------------------------------------------ 1) A-A' (1979) C91 quadrant bearing; N 73 E 2) B-B' (1953) C36 quadrant bearing; S 67 E 3) C-C' (1923) C6 quadrant bearing; S 57 E 4) D-D' (1923) C6 quadrant bearing; South 5) E-E' (1923) C6 quadrant bearing; S 50 E 6) F-F' (1923) C6 quadrant bearings; S 2 W - S 22 E 7) G-G' (1923) C6 quadrant bearing; S 50 E 8) H-H' (1956) C51 quadrant bearing; S 63 E 9) I-I' (1979) C91 quadrant bearings; S 71 E - S 34 E - S 71 E / S 71 E http://home.earthlink.net/~ctfeagans/SH_Fig183_a.jpg http://home.earthlink.net/~ctfeagans/SH_Fig183_b.jpg http://home.earthlink.net/~ctfeagans/SH_Fig184.jpg http://home.earthlink.net/~ctfeagans/SH_Causeway2.jpg Stonehenge, Heelstone, UK

Thank you Stumblebum. Covered in the above post. For those interested... The above publication is out of print but available through interlibrary loan. If one is so inclined comparison of the C6 cross-section cited in the above English Heritage 1995 publication, to the Hawley and Newall original 1923 map published in 1925, is available at most universities (at Southern Methodist University of Dallas for certain) in The Antiquaries Journal, 1925, published by Humphrey Milford, Oxford University Press, in Volume 5, at Page 21 preceeding, Plate IX. Nice photograph (black and white) in The Antiquaries Journal, 1925, in Volume 5, at Page 25 preceeding, Plate X, same in the above English Heritage 1995 publication, et al, including Stonehenge Complete by Christopher Chippindale, all 3 editions. But save and except for the C6 cross-section showing the detailed sample descriptions of the subject scrolling trench, none of the maps or photgraphs show it: because; Hawley and Newall did not excavate it completely so as not to disturb the Stonehole B (WA3606) area any further northeast of the scrolling trench origination (WA3607) area. Why? The subject scrolling trench was so large and deepening so rapidly to the northeast-east toward the west side of Heelstone, that if they had excavated it completely to the northeast-east, none of the features in its path would have been left to photograph, and present (sound familiar?), at the annual Report on the Excavations at Stonehenge reading, which occurred on 19th June 1924 covering the season of 1923. Basically, they were told to stop short and illustrate their to date findings, save and except for the large scrolling trench. Unfortunately, the Office of Works blocked any more excavation of the northeast-east scrolling trench, from Stonehole B (WA3606) to the Heelstone, and history has left us with the Hawley and Newall correctly drafted maps, incorporating dashed lines for undefinite features, and solid lines for definite features (see The Antiquaries Journal, 1925, published by Humphrey Milford, Oxford University Press, in Volume 5, at Page 21 preceeding, Plate IX.), and, of course, all of the misleading maps which followed in the solid lined Stonehenge publications. Thus, the historical question as to why the subject trench was neither fully excavated nor mapped any further than the northeast line of WA3607 is answered, the artistic question is is anyone here interested in expressing it artistically using our seismic refraction contour map as a basis, and the scientific question is when is the next seismic refraction survey going to be conducted over it because the first one is twenty (20) years old, and outdated. I think we should complete the excavation of 6th century BC Heelstone scroll trench began by William Hawley and Robert Newall through artistic expression of it, based upon all the above facts of the matter, and any more facts that may be acquired. ATT, 1st April 1985

***Stonehenge in its landscape; Twentieth-century excavations, Rosamund MJ Cleal, KE Walker, and R Montague, ENGLISH HERITAGE, 1995, ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT 10, ISBN: 1850746052, Pages 321-322, Figure 183-183 continued, Lieutenant-Colonel William Hawley's 1923 cross-section C6 of 9ft wide 33ft long WA3607 broad cut scroll trench to underneath Heelstone. Map of C6 cross-section at Page 269, Figure 156. Note: C6 cross-section at Pages 321-322; Figure 183-183 continued, shown reversed.*** Question No. 1. Concerning the mapping of easternmost Posthole at A (the 4th blackened circle on most Stonehenge maps), located 18ft due west of the Heelstone's west side; Does anyone think it is right, or wrong, to solid line contour and blacken in on any map a posthole, such as the easternmost Posthole at A, cut away entirely by the subject 6th century BC Heelstone scroll trench, when such easternmost Posthole at A does not exist? (see Hawley's 1923 cross-section C6 in above publication: Pages 321-322; Figure 183-183 continued) Question No. 2. Concerning the mapping of Heelstone's western elder circular ditch 9ft missing portion (the thinnest darkened portion on most Stonehenge maps), located 13ft west-southwest of the Heelstone's west side; Does anyone think it is right, or wrong, to solid line contour and darken in on any map a ditch, such as Heelstone's western circular ditch 9ft missing portion, cut away entirely by the subject 6th century BC Heelstone scroll trench, when such elder circular ditch portion does not exist? (see Hawley's 1923 cross-section C6 in above publication; Pages 321-322; Figure 183-183 continued) Question No. 3. Why is the subject 6th century BC Heelstone scroll trench not mapped honoring the detailed sample descriptions of the original C6 cross-section creators, Lt.-Col. William Hawley and Robert Newall, on most Stonehenge maps? (see Hawley's 1923 cross-section C6 in above publication: Pages 321-322; Figure 183-183 continued) Same original C6 cross-section at Salisbury and South Wiltshire Museum: http://www.aboutbritain.com/SalisburyMuseum.htm?RefID=1504297 -- 6th Century BC Heelstone Scroll Trench Stonehenge in its landscape; Twentieth-century excavations, Rosamund MJ Cleal, KE Walker, and R Montague, ENGLISH HERITAGE, 1995, ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT 10, ISBN: 1850746052, Pages 321-322, Figure 183-183 continued, Lieutenant-Colonel William Hawley's 1923 cross-section C6 of 9ft wide 33ft long WA3607 broad cut scroll trench to underneath Heelstone. Map of C6 cross-section at Page 269, Figure 156. Note: C6 cross-section at Pages 321-322; Figure 183-183 continued, shown reversed. Lydian lion electrum coins (7) in WA3607 scroll trench, 1 recovered. Described in daily Journal No. 4 at Stonehenge on 19th May 1923. Remaining artifacts along and at 12ft bottom of Inigo Jones' Stone-Heng Restored scroll trench East of coined Heelstone elder circular ditch (missing). Gold ark (2.5c-1.5c-1.5c), gold table (2c-1c-1.5c), gold altar (1c-1c-2c), gold candlestick, gold breastplate, gold ephod, gold censer, and brass laver, all, inside brass altar (5c-5c-3c) located beneath Hawley's Helestone lion head, calf head, man face, and eagle wings (pictured below). Jones' brass altar (5c-5c-3c) top side at 7.5ft augered depth. Scrolling trench 9ft wide 33ft long description from Stonehole B (WA3606) to 12ft below Heelstone 96 (Stonehole 163) surface: BEGINNING at mapped Stonehole B (WA3606), THENCE deepening Northeast, THENCE cutting Easternmost Posthole at A (missing), through C6 cross-section right triangle at southwest side, and Heelstone elder circular ditch (missing), THENCE East pass Stonehole 97 disturbance at northern side to beneath Hawley's Helestone lion head, calf head, man face, and eagle wings. Artifacts below Denoco Inc.'s ATT refraction seismic station No. 96 (sledgehammer source) recorded at Stonehenge on 1st April 1985. Salisbury Museum and above publication maps contour 33ft long broad cut scroll trench short by 25ft showing WA3607 only 8ft long. Robert Newall's 1923 scroll trench map contour short of Hawley's cross-sections and scroll trench East side under Heelstone (embedded 4.5ft). Three 1985 refraction seismic lines confirm Hawley's cross-sections and 9ft wide 33ft long scroll trench length and depths. Denoco Inc.'s ATT two north-south lines traverse WA3607 scroll trench width, and one east-west cross line ties along its length. English Heritage's AMLab 75 Ohm-m^2/m 1994 resistivity survey (above publication: Figure 261; Page 500) traceplot of raw resistivity data confirms ATT refraction seismic recordings. Upload of coined 6th Century BC Heelstone Scroll Trench 1984 magnetic-electromagnetic (EM-GPR) and 1985 refraction seismic maps and cross-sections to follow shortly. For MSN users: http://groups.msn.com/stonehengewhitestones http://groups.msn.com/arkarchaeology http://groups.msn.com/stonehengegeologyandgeophysics http://groups.msn.com/geomagnetism http://groups.msn.com/paleomagnetism For YAHOO users: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stonehengewhitestones http://groups.yahoo.com/group/arkarchaeology http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stonehengegeologyandgeophysics http://groups.yahoo.com/group/geomagnetism http://groups.yahoo.com/group/paleomagnetism For FORUM users: http://www.garrydenke.com/stonehenge.htm'>http://www.garrydenke.com/stonehenge.htm http://www.freewebs.com/garrydenke http://www.webspawner.com/users/garrydenke/index.html http://www.geocities.com/garrydenke http://www.garrydenke.bravehost.com Discussion at this forum appreciated. Garry W. Denke Geologist/Geophysicist Denoco Inc. of Texas Wildcat Station, P.O. Box 866488 Plano, Texas 75086-6488 Tel: 972-422-8268 Fax: 972-423-6337 Cell: 940-521-1667 http://www.garrydenke.com GarryDenke@garrydenke.com http://www.denocoinc.com GarryDenke@denocoinc.com

Many Thanks! Garry Denke

http://www.sciforums.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=2971&stc=1 Specifically define "this" in detail please.

These rocks get to stay dave, so what is the big deal? 1) Stonehenge White Chalk - The outcrop sedimentary rocks at Stonehenge are the Late Cretaceous Period, Santonian Age, calcium carbonates. The Late Cretaceous Period outcrop sedimentary rocks comprise the first (1st) English construction material used by the Stonehenge builders of England. This material is approximately 85 million years old. These stones are called Seaford Chalk Formation rocks. They are English and belong in England. 2) Stonehenge Sarsens - The youngest sandstone sedimentary rocks at Stonehenge are the Oligocene-Miocene (Tertiary) Period silicates. The Oligocene-Miocene Period sandstone sedimentary rocks comprise the second (2nd) English construction material used by the Stonehenge builders of England. This material is approximately 24 million years old. These stones are called Reading Formation rocks. They are English and belong in England. Unless of course Marlborough wants the Sarsens back; Save and Except: the Heelstone of Hampshire County. Stonehenge Heelstone Sculpture In 22 separate excavations, for which the detailed records are published, a total of "over 11,500 stone fragments were recorded" at Stonehenge (PROCEEDINGS AT THE BRITISH ACADEMY . 92, SCIENCE AND STONEHENGE, Cunliffe & Renfrew, 1997, pages 258-9), representing all of its different lithologies. Approximately 4,000 sarsen chips, including "a total of 3,760 sarsen fragments", and "sarsen sand from the area", excavated by Lieutenant-Colonel William Hawley (REPORT ON THE EXCAVATIONS AT STONEHENGE DURING THE SEASON OF 1923, W. Hawley, 1925, pages 21-50), from a single location within ten (10) meters of the Heelstone, in the Avenue between the Heelstone and the Slaughter Stone, "do strongly suggest that a stone was either dressed or broken up in the vicinity" (STONEHENGE, Cleal, Walker, Montague, 1995, page 290), in front of the Heelstone carvings. In 1975, Arizona State University (ASU) GLG 324 Petrology-Petrography class analised the Cainozoic Reading Formation sarsen samples provided by Professor Richard Atkinson from the London Basin, the Hampshire Basin, and from each of the sarsens at Stonehenge. The ASU 1975 GLG 324 Petrology-Petrography class determined through optical mineralogy and geochemical analysis that the source area of the Palaeogene-Oligocene age heavy mineralogy Heelstone was from the Hampshire Basin located to the south of Stonehenge, and all of the rest of the Neogene-Miocene age lighter mineralogy sarsens at Stonehenge were from the London Basin to the north of Stonehenge. It was from this first detailed analysis by ASU in 1975, and the subsequent works of H. Howard 1982; A petrological study of the rock specimens from excavations at Stonehenge, 1979-1980, in M.W. Pitts, 1982, 104-24, where the Heelstone carvings fragment chips from its sculpture were determined. In short, the piles of sarsen chips and sarsen sand at the sarsen Heelstone, "do strongly suggest that a stone was either dressed or broken up in the vicinity" (STONEHENGE, Cleal, Walker, Montague, 1995, page 290), in front of the Heelstone Lion head, Calf head, Man face (clockwise), and Eagle wings (centering) carvings: http://www.freewebs.com/garrydenke Bibliography: REPORT ON THE EXCAVATIONS AT STONEHENGE DURING THE SEASON OF 1923 William Hawley Antiq. J., 5 1925 21-50 Hele Stone, sarsen chips, and sarsen sand STONEHENGE R.J.C. Atkinson PENGUIN BOOKS in association with Hamish Hamilton 1956 ISBN 0140136460 INDEX 221 Carvings, prehistoric, 43-7, 91-3, 139-40, 178-9, 208-9 Heel Stone, 29-30,68-9, 70, 76, 105, 173, 203 STONEHENGE in its landscape; Twentieth-century excavations Rosamund M J Cleal, K E Walker, and R Montague with major contributions by Michael J Allen, Alex Bayliss, C Bronk Ramsey, Linda Coleman, Julie Gardiner, P A Harding, Rupert Housley, Andrew J Lawson, Gerry McCormac, Jacqueline I McKinley, Andrew Payne, Robert G Scaife, Dale Serjeantson, and Geoff Wainwright ENGLISH HERITAGE 1995 ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT 10 ISBN 1850746052 INDEX 603, 608 carvings, prehistoric 30-3, Plate 7.2 Heelstone (Stone 96), 25, 26, 166, 269, 270, 271, 272 PROCEEDINGS OF THE BRITISH ACADEMY . 92 Science and Stonehenge Edited by BARRY CUNLIFFE & COLIN RENFREW Published for THE BRITISH ACADEMY by OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS 1997 ISBN 0197261744 INDEX 351, 355 carvings, prehistoric 5, 29, 35, 150, 338 Heelstone (Stone 96) 15, 16, 28, 155 HENGEWORLD Mike Pitts C CENTURY . LONDON 2000 ISBN 0712679545 INDEX 402, 403 Stonehenge carvings 8, 26, 265-6, 296-7, 27, 266 Heelstone 8, 96, 135, 139, 145-50, 154, 229, 266, 275, 7, 138, 146, 230

superforce = c^4/G c = superpower/superforce superpower = c^5/G http://perso.club-internet.fr/molaire1/e_superforce.html We were there gathered and hoping to show you all of the Carboniferous rocks, circling/over the artifacts. No worries though, all of the Welsh born Stonehenge rocks are to be moved back to Wales: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/wales/3830547.stm Instead we visited the good Doctor Robyn Lewis who staked the official claim on behalf of all fellow druids, all bards and all the Welsh compatriots. Archdruid of Wales made no claim to our artifacts: http://dsc.discovery.com/news/briefs/20040614/stonehenge.html Discoveries sparked it. Glacial transport disproven. So much for the Judd, Kellaway, Hawkins, Williams-Thorpe, et al, glacial transport. Thomas, Atkinson, Greene, Scourse, et al, would be proud. http://www.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/?view=usa&sf=toc&ci=0197261744 Here is the good Doctor's requested list of Welsh rocks that need to go back to Wales. They are in the way of the excavation of our gold, silver, brass, iron, wood, and stone artifacts anyway. Archdruid of Wales, the good Doctor Robyn Lewis, has offered to pay for their removal, as agreed, making this a low cost excavation: http://groups.msn.com/ArkArchaeology/shoebox.msnw 1) Stonehenge Whitestones - The oldest limestone sedimentary rocks at Stonehenge are the Early Carboniferous (Mississippian) Period, Arundian Age, calcium carbonates. The Early Carboniferous (Mississippian) Period limestone sedimentary rocks comprise the first (1st) Welsh construction material used by the Stonehenge builders from Wales. This material is approximately 340 million years old. These stones are called High Tor (Birnbeck) Limestone Formation rocks. They are Welsh and need to go back to Wales. 2) Stonehenge Bluestones - The volcanic rocks (oldest geologically) at Stonehenge are the Ordovician Period intrusive igneous diabases (dolerites), and extrusive igneous felsites (rhyolites) and tuffs (basic). The Ordovician Period igneous rocks comprise the second (2nd) Welsh construction material used by the Stonehenge builders from Wales. This material is approximately 470 million years old. These stones are called Ordovician Volcanic rocks. They are Welsh and need to go back to Wales. 3) Stonehenge Coshestons - The oldest sandstone sedimentary rocks at Stonehenge are the Silurian-Devonian Period micaceous sandstones. The Silurian-Devonian Period sandstone sedimentary rocks comprise the third (3rd) Welsh construction material used by the Stonehenge builders from Wales. This material is approximately 417 million years old. These stones are called Old Red Sandstone Formation rocks. They are Welsh and need to go back to Wales. 4) Stonehenge Gritstones - The sandstone grit, conglomerate, limestone, shale, and coal sedimentary rocks at Stonehenge are the Late Carboniferous (Pennsylvanian), Namurian Age, silicates, calcium carbonates, and carbons. The Late Carboniferous (Pennsylvanian) Period sandstone grit, conglomerate, limestone, shale, and coal sedimentary rocks comprise the fourth (4th) Welsh construction material used by the Stonehenge builders from Wales. This material is approximately 320 million years old. These stones are called Millstone Grit Formation rocks. They are Welsh and need to go back to Wales. 5) Stonehenge Coalstones - The bituminous coal sedimentary rocks at Stonehenge are the Late Carboniferous (Pennsylvanian) Period, Westphalian Age, carbons. The Late Carboniferous (Pennsylvanian) Period bituminous coal sedimentary rocks comprise the fifth (5th) Welsh construction material used by the Stonehenge builders from Wales. This material is approximately 310 million years old. These stones are called Crosskeys Coal Measures rocks. They are Welsh and need to go back to Wales. Here Here to the good Doctor, the Archdruid of Wales! Garry Denke ps. See that fafalone, this redig is financed.

Sorry dave, here, Graviton's everywhere... E=(hc^5/G)^1/2 4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2 = [(6.6260687 x 10^-34 kg-m^2/s) (2.4216061 x 10^42 m^5/s^5)/(6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2)]^1/2 4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2 = 4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2 [rsu 3.9 x 10^-8] E=c^5/Gv 4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2 = (2.4216061 x 10^42 m^5/s^5)/ (6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2)(7.4008894 x 10^42 /s) 4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2 = 4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2 [rsu 3.9 x 10^-8] E=hc^3/Gm 4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2 = (6.6260687 x 10^-34 kg-m^2/s) (2.6944002 x 10^25 m^3/s^3)/(6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2) (5.4563026 x 10^-8 kg) 4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2 = 4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2 [rsu 3.9 x 10^-8] E=h(Gd)^1/2 4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2 = (6.6260687 x 10^-34 kg-m^2/s) [(6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2)(8.2089591 x 10^95 kg/m^3)]^1/2 4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2 = 4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2 [rsu 3.9 x 10^-8] G=c^3/mv 6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2 = (2.6944002 x 10^25 m^3/s^3)/ (5.4563026 x 10^-8 kg)(7.4008894 x 10^42 /s) 6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2 = 6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2 [rsu 3.9 x 10^-8] G =wc^4/E 6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2 = (4.0507625 x 10^-35 m) (8.0776087 x 10^33 m^4/s^4)/(4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2) 6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2 = 6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2 [rsu 3.9 x 10^-8] G=c^4/F 6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2 = (8.0776087 x 10^33 m^4/s^4)/ (1.2106066 x 10^44 kg-m/s^2) 6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2 = 6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2 [rsu 3.9 x 10^-8] G=c^5/P 6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2 = (2.4216061 x 10^42 m^5/s^5)/ (3.6293075 x 10^52 kg-m^2/s^3) 6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2 = 6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2 [rsu 3.9 x 10^-8] etc. (shortened to conserve bandwidth) http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/ (1998 values shown, working on 2002) Because it was recorded by the geophysical surveys, and it is known from literature, Exodus’ 114cm,45in x 69cm,27in x 69cm,27in four-winged gold ark (Rev's 'throne') and Ezekiel's four iron (ferromagnetic) wheels are currently located under the Stonehenge builders' rejected Heelstone, centered below the four beasts above it, surrounded by the 24 four elder(s) species of fossils (Carboniferous) around it, and the millions of species of younger fossils (Cretaceous) below it. Furthermore, 100m (328ft) east-southeast (E-SE) of Heelstone, at Stonehenge Mound, it was recorded by the geophysical surveys, and it is known from literature, Exodus' 229cm,90in x 229cm,90in x 137cm,54in brasen altar containing Exodus' 37-40 balance of artefacts (gold table, gold altar, etc.) are currently located inside Stonehenge Mound (Carboniferous), centered below its apex, surrounded by the ~32.5 tons of bituminous coal species of fossils (Carboniferous) around it, and the millions of species of younger fossils (Cretaceous) below it. It is true magnetic reversals are ongoing processes, however the quoted theory, one of many, is slightly flawed. All such theories will be tested by the EHAML-WANT (English Heritage, Ancient Monuments Laboratory - Wessex Archaeology, National Trust) 1) Gold Ark Experiment, to be conducted shortly. The EHAML-WANT 1) Gold Ark [with balance 1) brasen altar, 2) gold table, 3) gold altar] Experiment will trigger the next polar flip, such flip lasting less than 1hr,60min in time, beginning with decreasing candelas 36hr,2160min before exhumation, and ending with increasing candelas 36hr,2160min after exhumation, of EHAML-WANT 1) Gold Ark, throughout the universe of many. It is true this is a wildcat prospect http://www.freewebs.com/garrydenke but the exploration geophysics is completed and it is time to commence 'mining' operations. Garry W. Denke, Geologist/Geophysicist, Denoco Inc. of Texas, Wildcat Station, P.O. Box 866488, Plano, Texas 75086-6488 USA (972) 422-8268 Office, (972) 423-6337 Fax, (940) 521-1667 Mobile Graviton triggers the polar flip dave. Watch (time).