-
Posts
3856 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by blike
-
AHH!!! Daisy I don't know what the problem is Its working for me. Maybe we'll try a different server soon, thats probably the problem.
-
I dunno man. I haven't taken organic chem yet. Is this your first or second semester of it..?
-
I added a hack that will make it easier to quote posts. If you look in the upper right area of each post you'll see a checkbox with "quote" next to it. Check all the posts you want to quote and when you hit reply it will automatically quote them for you. Right now it only shows up for users using the orbitz theme. Let me know if you find any bugs.
-
Two more for the list today: From yahoo search: "My girlfriend doesn't appreciate me" From google search: "Things to make for your girlfriend"
-
Check it out. (from amazon): In a series of interviews with luminaries of modern science, Scientific American senior editor John Horgan conducted a guided tour of the scientific world and where it might be headed in The End of Science. The book, which generated great controversy and became a bestseller, now appears in paperback with a new afterword by the author. Through a series of essays in which he visits with such figures as Roger Penrose, Stephen Jay Gould, Stephen Hawking, Freeman Dyson, and others, Horgan captures the distinct personalities of his subjects while investigating whether science may indeed be reaching its end. While this book is in no way dumbed down, it is accessible and can take the general reader to the outer edges of scientific exploration. Check out some of the comments from people over at amazon:The End of Science: Facing the Limits of Knowledge in the Twilight of the Scientific Age (Helix Books)
-
It's working for me...
-
HRM. VERY STRANGE. i'll look into it
-
Haha, nooononono. A referral is the URL that brought someone to this website. So basically what that tells you is that someone typed cliteris on a google search and ended up here BTW the chat should be fixed , i dunno why you can't access it.
-
rofl. let me reiterate ScienceForums.net staff will not be held liable for any damages, be they direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, special, or exemplary that you may incur by using this site or information contained within. we don't condone drug use either just to clear my rear.
-
Not necessarily that evolutionary pressures cannot come up with organisms themselves, but they point out that there are certain mechanisms within living processes to which gradualism could not have developed, because all the parts rely on each other. Without one part, the process fails to have a function and/or has a negative affect on the organism, and would either be selected against or not selected for at all. This is their main argument.
-
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q= cliteris &sa=N&tab=iw
-
lol. i see you've found the comedy goldmine that is the "Pseudoscience" forum; home of Zarkovian Science, Pyramids that produce sacred water, all things spin gravity, and the vanishing planet X...
-
Counter-Strike originally was not an official mod. Only after its popularity exploded did Sierra show interest. But like you said, it isn't some pimply kid in his room that put out these mods. I do believe counter-strike was designed by two people, but they obviously had a good deal of experience with programming..and time. But they didn't use a program like winhack. Sierra made half-life's sourcecode widely available to anyone who wants it. Good luck making any sense of it though. One time a friend and I got it into our head that we were going to make a basic mod for half-life. I couldn't even get the darned thing to compile I hate C++ :\
-
lol. hmmm.... is right
-
If you want to see if the sales are statistically different for each region, what you're going to want to do is take the mean for each specific region. You will get four different means (assuming four regions: north,south,east,west) Then, take the standard deviation for each region. You will get four different standard deviations. Then you can use independant t-test to compare one sample to another (north to south, east to west, etc) to the degree of certainty you wish. I'm still not sure if I answered your question. If I read it correctly you weren't sure which xbar you wanted to use. Since you're comparing regions, calculate a seperate xbar for each region. You'll need those for the t-test. But remember the t-test can only compare one region to another, not all the regions at once. I'm not sure how to go about the ANOVA analysis, but I can look it up if thats the way you want to go.
-
For standard deviation of the ungrouped data just use the formula :lcsigma:^2 = [ (:sum: x^2) - ((:sum:x)^2 / N) ] / (N - 1) * where x = mean, N = sample size Do that for each region, then you'll have enough info to do the tests. *sample standard deviation, for population use N instead of N-1
-
If the universe is expanding, what are we filling up?
blike replied to Soulja's topic in Astronomy and Cosmology
Because they are not truly transparent. /doesn't know the argument, just wanted to chirp in -
Are you talking about the physics of space, or astronomy, or what..
-
Eh? What thing... BPH, GREAT suggestions, thanks. I'll let you know how it comes out.
-
I need your ideas for a slogan of some kind to go on my scienceforums shirt i'm making example: ScienceForums: more degrees than dates edit: yes, i put this in general science because half of you probably don't realize 'general discussion' even exists
-
Yea, I used the wrong word But you got my drift. I was thinking "neureal loops" as well, but it seemed a bit of a stretch.
-
"Albert Einstein may have been right that gravity travels at the same speed as light but, contrary to a claim made earlier this year, the theory has not yet been proven. A scientist at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) says the announcement by two scientists, widely reported this past January, about the speed of gravity was wrong.Stuart Samuel, a participating scientist with the Theory Group of Berkeley Lab's Physics Division, in a paper published in Physical Review Letters, has demonstrated that an "ill-advised" assumption made in the earlier claim led to an unwarranted conclusion. "Einstein may be correct about the speed of gravity but the experiment in question neither confirms nor refutes this," says Samuel. "In effect, the experiment was measuring effects associated with the propagation of light, not the speed of gravity." Full Article available here
-
I'm not sure I understand the proposed mechanisms by which a complex behavior in a species becomes instinct. Anyone have any insight?
-
NEVERMIND... I just talked to him. He didn't get the firework job, he works somewhere else, but I'm not sure what he's doing ;x