akahenaton

just because you something reacts quicker doesnt mean that its smarter.

any body got any ideas on how to make electrical wires superconductive and keep them that way? I was thinking that there would be a sleeve of liquid nitrogen around the electrical wires, with an energy absorbing system that used the thermal heat in the air around the wires to keep and produce more liquid nitrogen. any one got some krazy ideas? ( i know i spell crazy wrong)

xyph: i kinda thought about it and it does appear that i would have to suck large amounts of air to make this possible

dear meson: what i'm trying to say is that you gotta think backwards a little.... just think of a jet engine working backwards, or a car engine working backwards. I know it seems to not make sense but it is imaniginable, after all people back in the dark ages probabally thought that man was never going to fly.... and they were correct werent they?

i was thinking of an engine that would use the heat energy of the air itself and have the by products make what we would now call " fuel " like gasoline. i believe that some how we could make and engine that sucked air instead of pushed air. but the problem arises: how do i compress it and extract the heat? maybe some infra red photo voltaic cells or something else that i havnt thought of yet. p.s.: swansont, light pushes and pulls correct?

is this engine possible to be made? and if its theoretical then has carnot himself tried to produce such and engine, and does any body have any ideas on being able to make energy out of nothing?

which guy?

do excess velocities change the equation. like lets say the bullet travels 5 miles a second. the earth curves at 8 in at a mile away. so if you travel a mile in any given direction you'll be 8 inches lower than at your original point. Right?

the funny thing is.... is that no one said we had to be on earth to hit the target.... we could be in space and these calculations would'nt quite work well...... uhhh at least i think so....

what type of engine is the most efficient?

actually what i think the correct answer is 24.5 frames per second....... lol

can i ask y we can only hav hole numbers?

ya know.... it's really hard to think of reverse mechanics..... just try to imagine a jet engine working in reverse or a meteor being pushed into space instead of being sucked into the earths atmosphere...... COLOR="Red"]are reverse mechanics possible?[/color][/color]