lqg
Senior Members-
Posts
41 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by lqg
-
The question: A triple stellar system, showing a parallax of 0.01 arcsecond, is composed of a binary system, with a distance between the two stars of 0.2 AU, and a third star, at a distance of 90 AU from the binary. This system is observed in the optical (wavelength of 55000 Angstram) with a 1 meter telescope. a. What is the distance of this system ? b. How many stars will actually be seen when using a space-based telescope ? c. How many stars will be seen when using a ground-based telescope, where the typical seeing is 1 arcsecond ? My attempt at solution a. Well,[latex]\theta=0.01[arcseconds][/latex] ,[latex]D=\frac{\lambda}{\theta}[/latex] where lambda is the wavelenghth given in the brackets, and D is the distance of this stellar system from earth. Don't know how to do b. and c., any advice? Thanks in advance.
-
x'y' + xy = (xy' +x'y)' x'z + xy = x'y'z + yz + xy if (xy'+x'y)=1 then either xy'=1 x'y=0 or xy'=1 x'y=0 or xy'=xy'=1 1) xy'=1 x'y=0 then x=y'=1, obviously x'y'=0 and xy=0 cause y=0 and x'=0. and (xy'+x'y)'=0 so we have an equality. this way you prove for the other two cases and for the case where (xy'+x'y)=0 which is another three cases.
-
i might not be an astronomer but isn't the centre of our solar system is the sun itself? (regarding your first question).
-
Congratulations to the author, any connection?
lqg replied to Martin's topic in Linear Algebra and Group Theory
according to my dictionary (an oxford one). grime<=>dirt. this is why i asked what i asked. -
Congratulations to the author, any connection?
lqg replied to Martin's topic in Linear Algebra and Group Theory
your last name is really 'grime'? -
i'm not the expert, but that seems to me to be invalid.
-
sorry but i prefer to talk about the maths and not about the means to convey it via the internet. i guess i should work it out by my own, as allways.
-
what i have typed is: lim a_n+1-a_n/b_n+1-b_n=G
-
what about the first question, any tips there? so far, youv'e encrypted it very well. i don't have time to learn latex, if i had you bet your money i would post by latex.
-
here iv'e got another four questions, any pointers or hints would be appreciated. in the attached doc file. I have four questions about limits.doc
-
okay, forgot to look on monotonic series, thanks for the tip.
-
1) let a1,b1>0 b_n+1=sqrt(a_n*b_n) a_n+1=(a_n+b_n)/2 prove the existence of lim an as n->inf and lim bn as n->inf, and prove that they are equal? i figure i need to use epsilon ofcourse but the problem is with N, what its quantity should be with regard to epsilon and the variables here. thanks in advance.
-
i know of devcc++, but i think it will suffice. i need to get on with progress and not think of the past, thank you.
-
no, it isn't. but i appreciate the effort.
-
does someone know where may i download it from?
-
my question is still remains open, someone? i appreciate the help if you can hand in some.
-
thanks. can someone help me with the second one?
-
i hope that someone could help me with my q's here: http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=97985
-
kleppner's and french's mechanics, are there any other challenging books?
lqg replied to lqg's topic in Classical Physics
anyone? -
are the books of penrose's as rigorous as cartan's books? bacause if they are, i think it's better to buy them bacause of the rigorous treatment with the physical examples as well.
-
tom, what about roger penrose's two volumes about spinors and space time, isnt there also a rigorous treat to spinors besdies the physical one?
-
because they are the same: 0/0=0^0
-
because the collision with the stairs isnt absolutely elastic nor is it plastic the one that lasts is non elastic in this case e is between 0 and 1: 0<e<1