Jump to content

Nimmer

Members
  • Posts

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Nimmer

  1. What was it Arthur C Clark said? Merged post follows: Consecutive posts mergedI think this site is a great opportunity to think aloud however unqualified in the subject one might be. Thank you all for putting me right on my idea. Merged post follows: Consecutive posts mergedOK, let’s try a new theory. If my next theory has already been suggested (I would be surprised if it hasn’t) sorry for wasting your time. Me – Completely unqualified in this subject, so I am free to present my theory without embarrassment. Lets put all matter and energy under a heading and call it Positive. Lets call the vacuum of space the empty bits Zero. Now let’s call beyond the universe Negative, which seems to be rather appropriate. Now with all things wanting to be equal, an equilibrium between positive and negative is expected, creating Zero and thus more space, the expanding Universe. I conclude that this natural desire for equilibrium may be sufficient to overcome gravity. Should I stick to my day job? Merged post follows: Consecutive posts mergedIn anticipation. To those who have a one word reply to my last sentence - Cheers. Merged post follows: Consecutive posts mergedI do appreciate you taking your time to add to my thoughts, also please excuse my humour.
  2. This subject is way over my head, I was just thinking aloud. If the experts can't sort it then perhaps thinking outside of the box might work. I'm sure there are lots of ideas why this thought can't be right but by approaching it from the other direction ie to try and make it fit then perhaps it might snowball and gain plausability. But of coarse the idea must challenged and dissmissed if rubbish. Bring on an expert but keep the language simple please.
  3. With no datum possible could it be that the reason why the universe is accelerating in its expansion be that the universe is spinning as well as expanding and thus a centrifugal force is able to overcome gravity? Although it is evident that the universe is not expanding on one plane could this be because we are still at the initial stage of the start of the universe. An oval shape might develop.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.