-
Posts
54673 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
320
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by swansont
-
difficulty recycling my old smoke detectors, with americium 241
swansont replied to TheVat's topic in Other Sciences
Did you check with your municipal waste handlers? Lots of places have a couple of days a year where they handle HAZMAT waste. Also I think some manufacturers will let you print a prepaid shipping label for return to them, like the printing companies do for toner cartridges. -
That’s good, but it’s likely not as expensive as e.g. emergency surgery. And if they needed meds, what were they provided? If it was a short-term script, then that’s like stabilizing a patient with a physical ailment, and sending them on their way or transferring them to a “charity” hospital/clinic. The meds run out, and eventually there’s another emergency.
-
! Moderator Note Violation of rule 2.7. Discussion must happen here, and zip files are a security issue. Link and file removed And: free energy? Ha!
-
In theory, yes. ERs in the US are obligated to treat all emergencies owing to the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) In practice, they would likely be very stingy regarding what is an emergency condition, and do the minimum required.
-
I think it’s more that he has no real expertise to lend, so it doesn’t matter much.
-
When you registered your account you agreed to follow the rules of this site. You replied to a post in speculations but it was a new take, meaning you hijacked the thread. That’s against the rules. Preaching is also against the rules. “Scientist have zero for sure proof ANYWHERE about ANYTHING” tells us you don’t really have a grasp of science and are posting in bad faith (another violation) Further, the first rule of the speculations section is “Speculations must be backed up by evidence or some sort of proof. If your speculation is untestable, or you don't give us evidence (or a prediction that is testable), your thread will be moved to the Trash Can. If you expect any scientific input, you need to provide a case that science can measure” which is why you were admonished for not using science references, and why the post was put into the trash - we told you that would happen, if you had bothered to check. If you’re referring to your right under the first amendment of the US Constitution, you still haven’t. That means the government can’t silence you. We’re not the government and can moderate as we wish. Your speech wasn’t erased, but it was moved, because this site has rules, you broke several of them, and that’s what happens. If you complain about this elsewhere, make sure you point out that you broke the rules. You wouldn’t want to bear false witness. Oh, and “The Bible is recanted live stories” probably isn’t what you meant to say. But it’s a funny typo.
-
Sure. But the issue was “wealth inequity” - which I took as the difference between the very rich and the very poor. And there are hundreds of millions of very poor. Are people, on average, better off? Sure! But the very poor aren’t, and the rich definitely are. The inequity is greater. And that’s really a tragedy of modern times.
-
I don’t see that there has been a serious job offer for that position, so it’s largely moot, but I don’t know how much time it takes to say “Let’s go to Mars!” every now and then. It’s not clear that he’s all that involved with daily operations of any of his companies.
-
That he’s a tad better than a coin flip is hardly a ringing endorsement. A coin flip gets you 6 correct out of 12, and all you need are three elections where the winner is pretty obvious where there’s no real guesswork (Reagan beating Carter, Bush beating Dukakis are two candidates)
-
Which means the disparity comparison should not be using the poor in an industrialized nation as the baseline, since there are a billion people elsewhere who are worse off.
-
What does being speaker have to with going to Mars?
-
We’ve been over why this is a bad idea, but beyond that, I don’t see how it solves your conundrum. Surely a referendum can be both good and bad? We have referendums in the US, and it’s not like they universally get huge landslide victories. There’s always something bad about them, in the view of some of the people.
-
That has some physical significance, as it’s the most probable distance an electron would be from the proton in the S state of hydrogen. It gives you the scale of the size of the hydrogen atom. The classical electron radius doesn’t have an analogous role. By not saying much of anything other than citing the number, you didn’t do much to dissuade this notion.
-
! Moderator Note The Bible is not a scientific resource. Neither is AI. This is a science discussion board and this nonsense has no place here.
-
In industrialized countries, perhaps. There are a lot of people who don’t have access to clean water or safe food, or decent medical care, or even electricity.
-
Musk vs Bezos inequality misses the point. A rich king sitting on a pile of gold and jewels in olden times had the same issue of having money that would never be spent. That’s the case with inherited wealth. It’s why their heirs were also rich. So do the very rich.
-
! Moderator Note This topic was closed. You don’t get to start up a new one
- 1 reply
-
0
-
! Moderator Note What is it you want to discuss? Your rambling does not make it clear.
-
If you have a PhD in science, you must really love science.
swansont replied to greatgrapes's topic in General Philosophy
Tell me you’re a troll without saying you’re a troll. -
The issue was souls, and the fact that we don’t know the details of dark matter or dark energy doesn’t mean anything regarding souls. That’s on par with saying we don’t know what a particular light in the sky is and concluding it’s an alien. We didn’t know the details of the composition of the nucleus 100 years ago. It takes time to figure things out.
-
Please don’t use the report post function, or PMs, to request we fix trivial typographic errors. If you can no longer edit your post either live with the pain of having typed it’s instead of its (or whatever), or, if you must, quote yourself and respond with the correct version. Most of the time people will know what you meant. If they don’t, they can ask for clarification.