swansont

The last statement does not refute the first.

The last statement does not refute the first.

Some schools let you come up with custom disciplines. You could combine some of them or major in one and minor in another. There are disciplines of biochem, biophysics, and chemical physics, so it's not like choosing one excludes the others. Do what you enjoy the most. Also recognize that choosing one doesn't really lock you in to anything. There are jobs out there where diversity of knowledge would be valued.

Some schools let you come up with custom disciplines. You could combine some of them or major in one and minor in another. There are disciplines of biochem, biophysics, and chemical physics, so it's not like choosing one excludes the others. Do what you enjoy the most. Also recognize that choosing one doesn't really lock you in to anything. There are jobs out there where diversity of knowledge would be valued.

The mass increase is a misapplication of the equation. You basically have to redefine what you mean by mass, which makes it difficult to make ideas mesh.

The mass increase is a misapplication of the equation. You basically have to redefine what you mean by mass, which makes it difficult to make ideas mesh.

Gotta have a source on that.

Gotta have a source on that.

There are few theories so outlandish that you can't find some credentialed person that supports them.

There are few theories so outlandish that you can't find some credentialed person that supports them.

Go here and scroll down to "rectangular components"

Go here and scroll down to "rectangular components"

What we think of as particles also exhibit wave behavior - you can get electrons' date=' protons, neutrons and even whole atoms to diffract and interfere. The wavlenength is [sup'][math]\lambda=h/p[/math][/sup]

What we think of as particles also exhibit wave behavior - you can get electrons' date=' protons, neutrons and even whole atoms to diffract and interfere. The wavlenength is [sup'][math]\lambda=h/p[/math][/sup]