swansont

A moderator quoting the rules is somehow unexpected, and funny? (also, that’s “you’re”)

There are issues that are already acknowledged as being outside of science. One shouldn’t have to reiterate those boundaries with each new argument

! Moderator Note from Rule 2.8: Preaching and "soap-boxing" (making topics or posts without inviting, or even rejecting, open discussion) are not allowed. This is a discussion forum, not your personal lecture hall.

! Moderator Note Yes. It looks to me like you are 0 for 6 in following the guidelines I linked to. Stream of consciousness posting really doesn’t cut it. Some rigor is required.

What have you done so far? Nobody is going to just do your homework for you

! Moderator Note This is a discussion site, not your blog

No competent scientist claims that this is the case. Anyway, please review the guidelines for posting in speculations

! Moderator Note From rule 2.7 Links, pictures and videos in posts should be relevant to the discussion, and members should be able to participate in the discussion without clicking any links or watching any videos. Videos and pictures should be accompanied by enough text to set the tone for the discussion, and should not be posted alone

Limited by c, obviously. You could probably estimate the linear speed by calculating the rotational speed from the in-spiral graphs (inverse of the period), and using v = wr and with the Schwarzschild radius for r. (assume equal mass BHs)

Sort of. It can’t spontaneously begin to rotate without an external torque. But the current would feel a force, and if properly connected, the wire would rend to rotate in one direction while the battery+magnets would rotate in the other, such that the angular momentum would remain zero.

! Moderator Note The rules of this forum say otherwise

No, you misread that. M1 + M2 = ~100 and the mass of the resulting BH was ~91 The surface are limitation you cite is ~70 if M1 and M2 are (roughly) equal. 79, if they are 75 and 25. Converting 9 solar masses to energy isn’t in conflict. The numbers you cited earlier tell us that it was not instantly converted. It took a few weeks, if your number is correct.

You need to provide scientific evidence to back up your claim.

! Moderator Note No, it doesn’t. And making claims like this without evidence or a model means this does not fulfill the requirements of speculations. And this has been pointed out to you before

What mathematical model is the basis for this conjecture? Is there any independent evidence that any of these effects will happen?

It could be coherent if a resonant cavity were used. It’s how dye lasers work.

I put this up a few years back, over the “Time Service” sign at work. Not many people noticed. Had to wait a year from my original plan, owing to rain. (paper sign) I got rained out again and couldn’t do a “Navel Observatory” one last year.

The kinds of crystals, or the general name? Wavelength conversion crystals, nonlinear crystals, or photonic crystals for four-wave mixing are some descriptions There are a lot of different crystals https://www.unitedcrystals.com/NLOCOverview.html https://www.rp-photonics.com/nonlinear_crystal_materials.html

You don’t save energy by doing it in stages, and assembling everything in space has the overhead of launching all the parts - including spare parts - into orbit. Plus, as the recent launch showed, launching can be fairly destructive to the surroundings, so you wouldn’t want to do that anywhere near a space station.

People keep kicking them. They handle one more than the other.

Neener neener

Except you didn’t/won’t actually answer the question, and just restate your assertion that it’s not rare. Note that “medical intervention” is not synonymous with reassignment surgery OTOH, there’s this Genital surgeries performed on minors are rare, but surgeons say interest is growing. The Komodo analysis of insurance claims found 56 genital surgeries, including vaginoplasty and other procedures, among patients ages 13 to 17 with a prior gender dysphoria diagnosis from 2019 to 2021. https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/usa-transyouth-care/ Less than 20 a year in the US. If you read past the headline you’ll find that they say “The survey of 1,655 parents, published in the Archives of Sexual Behavior, found that more than half of the parents who were referred to gender therapists said they felt directed to put their kids on medical treatments or change their wardrobe.” (emphasis added) Further, if you read the paper, it says Parents were asked whether they had felt pressure from a “gender clinic or specialist” to transition their child socially or medically. Of the 390 parents who answered this question, 51.8% (N = 202) answered “yes,” so that article claim is a lie (color me shocked) - it’s not half of the 1655, it’s half of 390, and so it’s less than an eighth of the number surveyed. And we don’t have an indication of how many just bought new clothing. (New clothing, to me, doesn’t seem like a big deal.)

Something to consider…

Not to mention internet archives. Deleting all instances of a post means deleting where someone quotes the post, and asking that these be deleted means one is saying that their request supersedes anyone else’s desire to preserve their posts. No, that’s not going to happen.

Sex change industry? How old is “old enough”? How many reassignment surgeries are done on minors? Compared to, say, breast augmentation surgeries? There doesn’t seem to be any uproar about the latter. Do you have evidence that this happens?