sunspot

Thanks

When I left university, I had become a very objective scientist, a Mr Spock type, with an cool hearted analytical mind. When I started to work and was out of academics and having more control over my time, I decided I wanted to become more complete and decided to more learn about the subjective side of knowledge, through classical literature. The subjective side of knowledge also contained the various pseudo-sciences which were a blend of philosophy, religion and meta-physics. Through a broad spectrum of reading I dabbled in wide range of orientations, without becoming married to any one. I think it was a book on eastern mysticism, by some guru, that discussed a yoga techniques. This is where I learned about kundulini yoga. It is not something you do once and it happens. I did for about a month. Paralleling these last meta-physical readings, was intro book by Carl Jung. He spoke of the collective unconscious and synchronicity (meaningful coincidences). The stange experiences I had, gave me impetus to explore the arcane sciences through the eyes of modern science. Jungian psychology was the only orientation of psychology that seemed able to address the bizarre phenomena that healthy people often experience and appear to explain the internal nature of these projected pseudo-sciences.

Morality is a system of value judgements that attempts to define natural human behavior and distinguish this data set from unnatural human behavior. Humans are capable of both kinds of behavior. Without morality, the unnatural and natural become relative, with unnatural having the advantage, requiring less reason and will, and the ease of unconscious compulsion. For example, it is easier to steal than work for a living. It is easier to lie, at times, than to always tell the truth. It is easier to cheat than play by the rules. It is easier to divorce than work through difficult times. It is easier to overeat than eat heathful. It is easier to to drink too much than moderate to a couple of beers a day. It is easier to base self worth on money than on character. It is easier to run with the herd than to stand alone., etc.. If we put morality in historical perspective, modern civilization is very recent, maybe 6000-7000years. Before that humans or prehumans (before civilization), were small groups where everyone knew everyone like one big family. With civilization the family mentality is partially lost and one becomes more anonomous or one's cultural family now is only a part of the whole. The unnatural of today, was at one time, progressive in the sense of how one goes about living in this strange and unnatural cultural environment. But to make culture one big happy family, morality came to be. It was an attempt to define the new rules of modern natural human behavior that could best allow one big extended cultural family. Unnatural behavior is a throwback to being anonomous, where one's actions can not be seen as having any impact on others. Christ changed the requirements of morality, because it was limited to one large group, due to tindering by man. For example, prohibitions divide the cultural family. All that was required was love God and love your neighbor. It gave back some of the freedom to experiment with the constraint of weighing ones actions in the context of the big picture. Moderation is the key and the data so created hopefully allows one to see the same natural data set as everyone else.

In a very general sense men and women both lie for the needs of the other. Woman lie with physical illusions like makeup, hair, pushup bra, colors, etc., all of which are intended to create an illuison of enhanced beauty. Men like women to lie this way. Men would prefer natural beauty but the illusion works better than the reality of being natural average. Men, on the other hand, lie via verbal make-up, to create an illuison of enhanced personna. Women like men to lie this way. Women would prefer the weathy, ambitious, loving, etc., perfect man, but the illusion will work better than the reality of being average. Women often take advantage of male lying when they ask questions like, "do I look fat in this?". They do not want the truth but a light gray lie. Men take advantage of female lying when they ask their significant other to dress up in something sexy. These coping/lying skills, based on male/female interaction appear to spin-off into culture. Entertainment is there to create an illusion that combines both the costumes and the verbal illusions. Politics at all levels appears to be based this need to lie/cope.

Politics is closer to entertainment than education. That is why gray lying (diplomacy), evasiveness, and mud slinging are so important. These all help create a fantasy world, which can be entertaining. Whether it pushes one's buttons left or right, it is definitely not educational. If a polititian tries to educate the public on a new idea, he is ripped a new one, by all the entertainers.

There is one form of yoga that appears to cause this, called Kundulini. I may be spelling it wrong. But I would recommend being very careful this. One may need to do Chaotic Mediation first to empty the mind. When I younger (early 20's), I experimented with various types of occult, mysticism, meditation, Pagan rituals, astrology, theosophy, etc., and found this Kundulini technique. It scared the crap out of me. I was trying to leave my body to see if it was possible. I never expected it to happen, but one day using this yoga technique, I had an hallucination of my body expanding beyond its perimeter. I freaked out, when I was about to get my wish, or a strong halucination of my wish. I stopped doing the Kundulini technique after that. A few days later, I had forgot to set my alarm and was about to oversleep. I had a dream hallucination, that someone grabbed my leg to help wake me up. This woke me up and I was able to make it to work without being late. After that second experience, I stopped all the ancient arts and got very interesting in modern psychology. Chaotic meditation I will discuss, because it is an excellent technique that is very beneficial, although I have not done it since those days. It is hard for many people to totally relax and focus because too many things are going on inside. What this technique does is exhaust the body, heart and mind with chaos. To begin, you do omething very physically exhausting involving random body (dance) movement say for 10mins. This tires and calms the body. Next, one does an emotional catharsis (spelling?). Essentially, yell, cry, laugh, be angry, sad, in a random type of pattern for 10 mins. This will tire and relax the heart or emotional side. Next, talk in jibberish for 10 mins. Talk stupid sounds and word patterns that are random nonsense. This will tire and scramble the mind. For the last 10 min, stop and just relax with your eyes closed. Your body, heart and mind will need rest and you be feel very peaceful.

I agree with what you say. The point I was making is that nature, during the creation of the universe, steady state tagged 99.99999+% of the positive charge onto the protons and 99.99999+% of the negative charge onto the electrons. This high mass ratio arrangement prevents the two charges from canceling. They just dance for forever. The positron and electron, of equal mass, dance for an instant. I saw the heavy slow nature of the proton lowering its ambient magnetic field, preventing the canceling of charge. The latter does occur, but requires extreme instead of ambient conditions. The positron/electron will cancel under most conditions.

Space and 1-D Phase I was going to define the faces of the cube, but I realize that in my last post I made a reference to space. As such, I think it might be useful to discuss the MDT version of space, first. Whereas as MDT particles are 3-D in the model, and the three light speed particle/waves phases are 2-D, space is 1-D phase in the MDT model. Being 1-D it implies that space has one variable parameter and two light speed parameters. The three aspect of 1-D phase or space are shown below. Space has three integrated aspects. (M, D=C, T=C), (M=C, D, T=C) and (M=C, D=C, T) In the MDT model, space is a little more comprehensive than the normal definition, in that these varaibles do not always define the vacuum of space. For example, the orbitals of atoms occupy mostly space. This is rather busy space, with a lot going on; electron mobility, EM force, gravity, etc. With space being the medium for all this exchange, this space will have a particular set of variable parameters, that are the same throughout similar orbtials anywhere in the universe. If we go into the nucleus of our atom, this is even busier space, with particles relatively close, and with the weak and strong nuclear force also propagating through this space. If we go into a region between galaxies, there are still many things going on via space, but things are more rarefield. The three variables accommodate the range of space with or without substance interacting in it. Digressing for a monent; The three 2-D light speed particle/wave phases, technically each have two components as shown below. (D,T,M=C), (T,D,M=C); (M,T, D=C),(T,M,D=C); (M,D,T=C),(D,M,T=C) Each pair essentially acts the same but will stem from a different parameter induction order. For example, as the EM spectrum goes toward gamma rays, this energy can affect the nuclear force in an ioinzed atom where there are no electron/proton interactions to produce the EM spectrum. As such, it isn't as much as the distance potential change of the electron, causing a coordinated change in time potential (D,T,M=C), as it is a time potential change causing a coordinated change in distance potential (T,D,M=C). The output is still part of the energy spectrum, but sometimes distance potential and sometimes time potential can lead the energy generation process. The same is true of the other two 2-D phases. As another example, the Dopplar shift is due to relative motion affecting energy via altering the distance potential of the light to create a coordinated change in time potential, so the product remains at the speed of light. Theoretically, a time potential change of energy can lead to a coordinated change in distance potential and also create a red shift. One would be hard pressed to distinguish the two. With respect to the universe and the observed mass, distance and time shifts, I called the second one of each of the three pairs, the phantom wave phases, because each popped out of the model but are unexplored at this time. Getting back to 1-D phase or space, the six light speed aspects within its combined three components, coordinate it with any combination of the six (three) light speed wave/particles phases.

The solution to the drug problem(s) is easy. Uncle Sams goes in and buys a good fraction of the dope supply at the best wholesale price and then undercuts the entire market. This drives out all the middlemen where the most violence is. All the profit margin is gone and the whole system is disupted. Next, Uncle Sam distributes the dope, at cost (to recoup its investment), through distribution centers that are full of parents, teachers, doctors, clergy, health care workers, police, etc.. The idea is to interact kindly and teach everyone the risks, while stressing the point of moderation leading to indifference.

The light speed wave phases As a way of introduction as to defining the faces of the cube, I would like to look at energy. Energy or photons have a particle/wave nature. The MDT model defines energy as a 2-D phase with variable parameters in D and T, while the mass potential=0 aspect, stays constant at the speed of light. For simplicity energy is written as (D,T,M=C). The M=C aspect is the light speed particle nature of energy, while the variables D and T define the wavelength and frequency of energy. This allows both to exist together. Although energy travels at C, it shows finite reference via its wavelength and frequency. In other words, if we traveled at C, time would be totally dilated and distance totally contracted. Yet energy is able to travel at C and still show a variety of distance and frequency that are way less than infinite. This is a natural artifact of only 1/3 of energy going at C, while 2/3remains finite in reference. How this possible will be clear when the three edges connected to space are addressed. In the MDT model there are three light speed wave/particle phases, which comprise the three possible combinations of MDT with 2/3 finite and 1/3 at C. These are listed below in MDT terminology; (D,T M=C), (M,T, D=C) and (M,D, T=C) The first I called the energy spectrum, the second I called the heat spectrum and third I called the entropy spectrum. This terminology may be a little confusing and was an artifact of working in relative isolation and developing my own nomenclature. I will try to explain what I mean by these terms. The energy spectrum reflects coordinated changes in D and T. The heat spectrum or (M,T, D=C) runs parallel to the energy spectrum but is more of an artifact of temperature and radiant energy. If we heat a body of a certain mass to a particular temperature, it will radiate a certain wavelength. If we double the mass and use the same amount of heat, the temperature will not go as high. The heat spectrum is a function of mass potential and time potential the product of which equals the speed of light of the distance parameter. The D=C aspect shows this being independant of distance. Whether on contracts or fluff out a certain mass, it will still have the same thermal energy. The M=C aspect of the energy spectrum implies D,T independant of mass potential. Electron transitions conserve mass, but alter only D and T. The energy and heat spectrum are highly overlapped but can act indendantly; mass burn is mostly the heat spectrum, while an electron orbital transition is mostly the energy spectrum. The entropy spectrum or (M,D, T=C) has little to do with entropy in the traditional sense of meaning disorder. As I defined it, it is deviation from the singular order found, say within black hole. As such, the entropy spectrum means all the mass and distance potential combinations of the universe, ie., coordinated movement of mass and distance potential, with T=C . Essentially, the entropy spectrum includes electron orbitals, planetary orbits, etc. where mass potential/distance potential ratio are related to C. The T=C aspect implies eternal configurations. This is a probably little confusing, but again remember that mass, distance and time potential are not the traditional mass, distance and time but include more subcomponents.

Just to repeat myself. This discussion is about how just varying the three special relativity variables allows all the laws of physics to remain the same in all references. This logically implies that all the laws of physics can be expressed with just those three variables. The mass, distance and time relativity or mass, distance and time potential, as I called them, has to be more than just tradtional mass, distance and time, or else it would be impossible to do. I tried to conceptually present a possible set for each variable with distance potential appearing the most pregnant with many subcomponents. When I came up with the cube, it made my head spin. It was so simple yet so cprovocative. It is a matter of getting use to it. I am not claiming that I have all the answers. The laws of physics took decades and thousands of bright minds to iron out the basics; beyond that there is a wide variety of ideas about many points. I can not integrate everything out there. Even the basics are a lot to chew from the ground up. What I have been able to do is provide a start on one possible approach for expressing the laws of physics in three variables, to show it is do-able.

I would like to share some interesting ideas that came to me last night about positive and negative charge. Positive and negative charge are two sides of the same coin, in the sense that both create electrostatic force but of the opposite sense. What is interesting is that both are integrated within the magnetic force. In other words, if a postive charge was moving left or a negative charge right, at the same velocity, it would be hard to distinguish them from the magnetic fields that would be created. So they are integrated by the magnetic force into something common to both. What is also interesting is that if one takes a positron and an electron they will attract, anihillate each other, and cancel the charges. But if the positive charge is part of a proton the electron and proton can not readily cancel each other out under normal (low energy) conditions. The question is, why does the extra mass make all the difference in the world as to how opposite charge interacts? One possible way to answer this question is connected to the larger mass of the proton. The larger mass of the proton does not allow the positive charge to move as fast such that it can not generate the same level of magnetic field as the electron (under the same conditions). Charge only appears to disappear when the generated magnetic fields are very close in magnitude. Either the positive has to get faster or the negative slower?

Dream symbols are all parts of the person having the dream. Water symbolises thoughts, which in this case are connected to thoughts that the dreamer feels are poluted; Poluted in the sense of not being clean or wholesome within the value system of the dreamer. When he falls into the water, it is shallow and only his feet touch the water. The feet symbolize instincts; how one is connected to the earth. His conflict is connected to his instinctive repression. Being shallow, show this is quite close to consciousness; not deeply repressed. The two women are aspects of his female side. Being two show there is a split in his emotional state, with both aspects in the poluted water. This is interesting in that the unconscious mind consideres both sides of the split unhealthy or in the poluted water. This probably indicates the two women who led and are leading him are neither kosher for him. The whale is symbolic of the unconscious mind. It going after the two women, showing his unconscious mind starting to disrupt his unhealthy split emotional state. But it is also symbolic, being a former priest, of Jonah and the whale. Jonah comes out the whale by the grace of god. He will probably return to his faith and find a more wholesome woman more in harmony with his beliefs; not like his mother or his present girlfriend. His present girlfriend was the antedote to his mother but the medicine is becoming harmful in another way.

I do not know the numbers, but legal drugs (past, present and future), have caused more deaths than the illegal ones. Ironical hah? The difference comes down to lobbyists and campagn contributions. Making certain things illegal takes that group out of the lobbyist game. What I would do is set the bar at something that is useful, maybe sometimes harmful, but legal, i..e, alcohol, chemotherapy, etc., and we will call this the zero point. Anything that has data that shows it is worse should be illegal and anything where the data says it is less harmful will be legal. This would go for both currently legal and illegal drugs. This would provide an objective scientific basis instead of a subjective political basis to determine which go where. From stories I have been told, marijuana was very cheap back in the 60's. About $100-150/ pound. Very few people did cocaine regularly because it was relatively expensive. By the late 70's or early 80's, the price of MJ had reached $100/oz, making cocaine competitive in price; $100/gram. Those who smoked MJ, who had got use to paying $100+, figured they could just as well blow this money on coke and have a good time. From then on, MJ prices continued to rise and coke stayed flat. The rest is history with the extreme abuse during the 80's and 90's. We have Uncle Sam to thank for this. They disrupted the cheap MJ distributution, shifting the market toward the more severe and violent cocaine abuse.

If one plots the velocity (v) of Special Relativity gamma (γ) for mass, distance and time, respectively, from 0 to C, on a 3-D grid, the result is the cube shown in figure 1. Only the velocity variable of gamma is plotted, where the velocity for any mass subunit, Vm, is the x-axis. The velocity for any distance subunit, Vd, is the y-axis. And the velocity for any time subunit, Vt, is the z-axis. I used capital V to distinquish the subunit relativistic velocity. I did not plot gamma or gamma times (m, d, or t), but only velocity. The reason I did this, was I did not want to create infinite axis, if velocity=C was plugged into gamma. By plotting velocity instead for each of the three variables, a finite cube was formed that goes only from 0 to C. The cube is finite. but functionally contains 0 and infinite gamma in potentia. This extra, do the math separately step, allows one to maintain finite axis and still imply infinite results. For example, the point labelled (CC0) would mean Vm=C, Vd=C, Vt=0. These would imply infinite relativistic mass, infinite distance contraction and 0 time dilation, etc. I am going use a 3-D MDT particle that is composed of the three smallest, near infintesimal units of mass, distance and time. I will then move from apex point to apex point and vary the velocity in various ratios of 0 and C, and look at the reference that our particle will see with those parameters. This is summarized in figure 2. There are two uniform apex singularities (000) and (CCC) and six intermediate apex singularities with various combinations of 0 and C. The first pair of diagonally opposing apexes is (000) and (CCC). The two uniform apex singularities (000) and (CCC) will be called nothingness and eternity, respectively. The (000) reference will see nothing beyond it near infinitesimal state. While the (CCC) reference will imply infinite eternal. With these two apex references fixed in place on the cube, the relativistic potential between nothingness and eternity will define something tiny (0+, 0+, 0+), analogous to the short-lived reference particle of this analysis, and something less than eternity (C-, C-, C-), analogous to the finite universe, respectively The apex at (C, 0, C) is the black hole. Vm=C would define infinite mass, while Vt=C will define its very long life stability. The Vd=0 would define its singularity with respect to inertial size or distance. Absolute zero is the apex at (0, C, 0). Absolute zero is not a possible mass state or Vm=0. The inertial universe can’t exist at absolute zero so its time or Vt=0. While the uniform coldness of space need to define absolute zero implies this apex needing to be everywhere with respect to distance or Vd=C for absolute zero to exist. These two fixed but diagonally opposing apexes will set a potential with each other, keeping each singularity from forming in the universe, while still forming finite versions of each other within the universe, i.e., finite phenomena that behave like black holes (C-, 0+, C-) and the near absolute zero temperature of space (0+, C-, 0+). The third pair of diagonally opposing apexes is (0, C, C) and (C, 0, 0). The first implies zero mass with infinite distance and time. This would be infinite eternal empty space. The second would have infinite mass but no size and would not last even an instant. This is the hypothetical mass point singularity. Their fixed positions on the cube and the potential between them creates finite instead of completely empty infinite space (0+, C-, C-) and a finite mass singularity that is a little bigger than a point that lasts a little longer than an instant (C-, 0+, 0+). This is analogous to the primordial atom. The fourth pair of diagonally opposing apexes is (C, C, 0) and (0, 0, C). The first would have infinite mass stretched out over infinite distance but only lasting an instant. The second would have no mass or size but would last an eternity. The first would be similar to the near infinite mass point spread uniformly over infinite space for an instant. The second is eternal time without any mass or size. Their fixed positions and the potential between will create a nearly infinite mass spread over a near infinite universe that lasts slightly longer than an instant (C-, C-, 0+). The second will result in a very large but finite time interval with a very small amount of mass and size (0+, 0+, C-), i.e., tiny long-lived particles. If one extrapolates the potential between all the diagonally opposing apex point pairs they all meet in the center of the cube. This is the point where all the opposing apex potentials overlap, simultaneously, Figure 2b. It would be the reference where the four pairs of opposing singularities have no potential with each other and with the other singularities. The eight apex points define the eight mathematical singulariites. Just inside the apex are the finite versions found within the universe. The cube also has six faces and twelve edges. This is where the rest of physics will integrate. The center point is where common matter is. These will be future topics.

Sorry for my conceptual rantings but they will be useful as the model progresses. I was going to discuss MDT cosmology, but that is partially conceptual because it was an easy application of the model. Because of the discontent, I will go right into the math.

I agree Swansont that there is great overlap but not at the point where the physics of the EM force overlaps electron orbitals. Consider any atom. The electrons in the orbitals are in rapid motion, filling the volume of the orbital.This is charge in motion, moving near the speed of light. There should be a lot of magnetic force stemming from the electron movement within the orbitals. Electron orbitals are magnetic shapes that are integrated with the electrostatic force. Getting back to H2 and O2, the H2 has two electrons and two proton, while the O2 has sixteen proton and sixteen electrons. If only the electrostatic force mattered this should be stable. Going to H2O, still retains the same balanced electron/proton ratio, such that the electrostatic force did not appear to gain or lose anything. The exothermic formation of the two -OH, dipoles was due to magnetic addition within the 2P orbitals of oxygen allowing an imbalance of charge where it did not originally exist.

The war on drugs puts Americans in jail. They may be dealers or users but many are still Americans. When one has prisoners of War they are POW's. If the AMerican government wages was against its citizens, that is not Costitutional.The war on Terror at least goes after foreigners and the prisoner are considered POW's and are given all which that entails. Lets look at the example of outlawing tube socks so it becomes a crime to wear them. Some would blindly follow the law. Others would be outraged and in protest would wear tube socks. Others would hate those whos dare to oppose the law and would not hesitate to beat and harrass anyone caught wearing them (a legal excuse to be A-holes). An underground would also form against the stupid law, where those who protest the stupid law could trade in tube socks. It would be a symbol of freedom fighting. These tube sock peddlers would now become public enemy number one, such that if a swat team went in a shot one of them is would be considered righteous. The lawyers would love this and many new jobs would be created. Look at prohibition in the 1920's. Did American drinking slowdown and did American empathy improve during the prohibition. Things esculated, the mafia monster was given the best stream of life blood it ever had. Crime on both sides of the law increased. When it was repealed, did all the Americans became alcoholics. Prohibition creates temptation. Remove the prohibition the temptation steadily declines because the dark side of human nature loses its power over culture.

Maybe my magnetic force explanation is a little bit off the mark. But another way to visualize the impact of the magnetic force, is when water forms. One has essentially two neutral molecules H2 and O2 combining, very exothermically I may add, to form two dipoles (one for each O-H bond. This would appear to break the laws of physics because, typically to form a dipole from a neutral start is endothermic. One possible thing that can account for this, paradox, is the magnetic force playing a significant role in the energy equation. The model that I visualize for the cell works sort of like this. The H in question are attached to O and N, trying to get other O and N to share some of what they took from their fellow hydrogen. All the O and N are quite magnetic stable and stingy with electron density, but H is hungry and will take what it can. But biochemistry screws things up for H even further, by making odd bond angles, long bond distances, and sometimes just not enough N and O around for it to share. In the cell, we have all these H with lingering potential. Not all biomaterials are so cheap, some are very generous and allow H to feast, while other make them starve. This sets up hydrogen potential gradients within the cell that is connected by the water. At the time of Einstein, when he was working on relativity, physics and chemistry were very close. What is called physical chemistry today was the much of the physics of Einstein's day. After he published relativity, physics and chemistry parted ways. Physics went after subdividing the nucleus into subparticles. And chemistry went in the opposite direction of molecular synthesis. Where I am looking, is in the no-man's land between these two sciences. It is a neutral territory that requires physics getting close again to chemistry and chemistry closer to physics.

I would like to propose a fun conceptual model, that you can have, that can readily explain all the observational universe. I came up with this last year. It is model that can explain the observation data of the universe. Picture is we created a house of mirrors. We position the mirrors at various long distances so that the light reflected between all the mirrors takes various amounts of time to return to us. The time delay and the reflections of time delay would allow one to see the step by step history of their visit in the house of mirrors reflected back to them, at the same time real time events are being reflected by close mirrors. If we also allow our house of mirrors to expand with a uniform velocty from center, each reflection will be red shifted and the more times the light is reflected back and forth will result in the most additive red shift. This will create an illusion that the events from the beginning of our visit are accelerating away from us at the highest velocity. If we go into our house of mirrors with a group of friends and then scatter, each person would view themselves as the center, while the history of our and everyone else's visits would create a diversity of real time, historical and red shifted data of many orders of magnitude more people than are there.

Lets look at little closer at what I called, MDT particles. This is not just the mass, distance and time of a particle, which excludes charge, etc. Rather these three variables are the final result of what special realtivity does to mass, distance and time, to allow the final result to vary all the laws of physics for each reference. As such, each of the three potential variables, i.e., MDT, are composed of more than just mass, distance and time. Once again I am going to do this conceptually to give one an intuitive feel for the variables. As the model proper develops, things like the four forces of nature will pop out of the model, all integrated. Before beginning, MDT particles of matter are 3-D particles , in the model, in that they have finite parameters in all three MDT potential variables. Energy is 2-D, in the model, because it only has finite parameters in distance and time potential, with the mass parameter zero so it can travel at C. From a 3-D MDT particle, a wide range of 2-D energy can appear to express the 3-D potential. For example, an electron can give off the spectrum of EM as well as heat during mass burn. I would like to introduce the three variables of the MDT model; mass potential, distance potential and time potential. The MDT particles are composed of all three relativistic parameters. The mass potential is straightforward and is a measure of the relativity in a particles mass parameter. The higher the relativity affect, the higher the measured mass in our inertial reference. As the little mass subunits go faster or slower, this will determined the measured mass. For example, the proton will have more mass potential than the electron. During nuclear fusion, the mass potential will decrease. The distance potential is conceptually similar to mass potential. It is a measure of the relativity with respect to a particle's distance parameter. Distance potential is essentially everything connected to the distance variable expressed in physics equations, plus entropy. For example, the electro-magnetic force will have a higher distance potential than the strong nuclear force. The higher distance potential or distance dilation associated with the EM force, brings farther distance in closer for the greater distance encompassing electro-magnetic force interaction. A free electron will need to lose some distance potential to become part of an atomic orbital. Time potential is a little more confusing to conceptually visualize beyond time dilation, because when one thinks of time, one primarily thinks of seconds ticking away. After much contemplation of time dilation, it dawned on me that changes within relativistic velocity could readily explain the spectrum of inertial time using this model, even if the little spinning orbiting time subunit particle(s) only had a singular native time frequency. Transient phase has low time potential or low time relativity, while the long phase has high time potential or high relativity. The most transient state of the transient phase begins to approach the singular native time frequency behind the time potential spectrum. Changes in time potential imply changes in relativitistic velocty instead of changes in actual time, since the little time particle clock never needs to change from its singular native time frequency. As such, time potential changes imply relativistic velocity changes over a finite time duration. This relativistic velocity-inertial time summation is expressed by heat; frequency aspect of heat. Heat is life or time potential changing over inertial time. If the entire universe ever reached absolute zero, it would run out of time potential; i.e., state of no more heat. Although MDT particles have three relativistic parameters, perturbations can occur with one, two or three parameters changing. For example, electron-positron annihilation will alter all three parameters of the electron while removing the relativity, i.e, annihilation. Electricity will increase the distance potential of electrons while also partially altering time potential via resistive heating. While superconductor style electricity controls the temperature or the time potential of the electrons, so that essentially only the electron’s distance potential changes. An example of one parameter having several additive parts is the coupling of the electro-magnetic force. The distance potential of the electron defines both charge and entropy/motion. The distance potential of the electron (motion) in conjunction with its charge will produce magnetism. If the distance potential lowers to where motion equals zero, the electron will still have charge or distance potential but it will de-couple from the magnetic force. If the distance potential lowers even further, the electron will begin to de-couple from negative charge. Another example of a two part parameter is heating a stable nuclei. Its total time potential will be its stable time potential state (life expectancy plus heat. Left alone in space it will radiate heat or lose time potential until only its stable time potential state remains. As an integrated example, the nuclear fusion reaction causes the mass potential to decrease and the distance potential of the strong nuclear force to increase (strong nuclear force is now sharing larger space). The time potential decreases drastically during fusion to reflect an exothermic reaction into a lower time potential nuclei configuration. We then can use this time potential or heat output, to increase the distance potential of molten metal, steam, turbines and electrons to make electricity. The three variables are interconvertable. For example, mass can create energy and energy can create mass. In the former, mass potential converts to time and distance potential, in the latter time and distance potential can become mass potential. In nature, fusion for example, the natural progression is mass potential to time potential (mass burn causig the nuclear force to increase distance potential), time potential to distance potential (electron kick out to form atoms) and distance potential back to mass potential (atoms coming together for higher level fusion).

Actually I am trying to teach something very new and fairly complicated. This is only an introduction to help create a conceptual understanding before I start doing the harder physics. I would challange any aspect of physics, for example, say String Theory to explain itself to an unfamilar audience in a few paragraphs. It would raise more questions than have answers under those conditions. If one was to just present all the final math, it would answer all the questions, in potentia, but one would lose the audience. Either way, if would be very hard to get the point across to an unfamilar audience, in such a narrow format. What I am trying to do it give everyone a feel for how the MDT or mass, distance and time potential or special relativity mass, distance and time, are fundamentally integrated in the overall model. What I still need to do is define the three potential variables in something more familar to the normal thinking within physics. After this second part of the introduction, I will get into the good stuff. Maybe part of the difficulty is that I am trying to make everyone think instead of memorize. The power of the final model is that it allows one to do physics in one's head. I just need to get circuits connected first. If anyone needs me to clarify points, please speak up.

The war on drugs is there to create jobs. Consider how many jobs it creates. There are high paying tax free jobs for the inner city. There are many jobs for lawyers, law enforcement, criminal justice system, the prison system, the rehab system, etc., plus the multiplier effect that results as this seed money goes back into the economy. If we decided the drug war was another Viet Nam, that was a non righteous money pit that could never be won (WWI, WWII, Korean, Viet Nam, Persian Gulf all combined took less time to complete), many jobs would be lost. To me it does not seem fair that we enslave (inprison) a good fraction of the American people to justify all these jobs. Maybe we can spread out the jobs and imprisonment more fairly. For example, we will create silly laws that guarentee that 20% of all the lawyers be in jail at all times. The former imprisoned personal consumption drug users can parlee that into a good paying job. It would not cost any more; redistributing the benefit/liabilty distribution of jobs. If we are having a war against drugs, does that make all those imprisoned by the war on drugs, POW's. As POW's are they not entitled to the laws of the Geneva Convention. What the war on drugs also means is that our government is waging war against its own citizens. I am no expert, but isn't this illegal under the Constitution? The government can never win this war because American's will never allow tyranny to rule. This war is creating causualties on both sides. The addicted are the wounded of this war. Addiction is an artifact of prohibtion creating temptation. But in this case, the enhanced tempation is a direct protest against increased tyranny.

The psychologist Carl Jung correlated this for humans 50-60 years ago. He called the genetic predisposition behind innate collective human behavior the archetypes of the collective unconscious. The archetypes amount to personality software, genetically ingrained in the brain at birth, that makes human nature similar on all humans independant of culture. The personality software is empty as birth but represent molds for structuring the data that makes up various aspects of the personality. The archetypes are essentially genetic neural data molds for structuring environmental (plus internal) data. The archetypes usually work in the background, but can sometimes take on a life of their own. For example, falling in love, is a collective human expression that has probably not changed in thousands of years and can create personality dynamics the ego can not normally create for itself. The "Devil made me do it" is probably a better analysis for the archetypes than "genetics made me do it", since the genetic mold is generic but the jello in the mold is data collected and organized sometimes over decades. The archetype mold will make one fall in love, but the jello in the mold may cause one to fall in love with something inanimate, with the archetype compulsion being strong enough to appear like natural instinct. The archetypes are a limited set and all the personality abberations, even within socially acceptable behavior, are jello affects.

I agree with both lrokwild and joema that genetics play a part but that environmental is also important. The example that there is a 50% chance that identical twins can both develop schizophrenia, also suggests that environmental influences can have a strong or 50% impact on altering the predestined effect of genetic predispositon; mind over matter. This suggests the opposite being true, negative mind over matter, can create conditions that are attrbuted to genetic predispostion. If Flip Wison's character used morality the devil may not make him do it. Or if behavior and environmental conditions are such, genetics can be overcome or exaggerated.