Fiend

we go to the same school, we're in the same computer class...we're gonna have the same ip address (FYI). and if you'll read my post, i explained what happened.

sorry about the CD thing...i was typoing a post to someone else about this stupid Cd that keeps freezing in my drive. interesting. actually, the device he is trying to produce is a device he plans on useing to test his hypothesis.

my point in debating it here is b/c i don't know who or what moderator banned my FRIEND not ME. i won't be on here much longer. i'm only here to figure out what's going on and if there is any way ot solve the problem. since i do not know who banned him, i will post it "publicly" for all to see including the one who banned him, in hope that the one who banned him will come out of hiding and confront the problem. Edit: Danny, i'm quite sure he realizes that now. teh theory is written in a very specific way you cna only fully understand it from reading it from front to back. he said he wrote it this way so that others can catch the train of though and see it the same way he did, making it easier to understand...wait, yea, he just told me he made a mistake from putitng that one up there. he was wrong and needs to fix it, hasn't gotten around to it yet.

intersting...well..then, by that definition, i guess it is not science. but, neither is anything that is recently being studied (whether by scientists or not) whcih does not have proof...but the study is to provide proof. correct? well, by that definition it is. but, people still call it "Science" or for better terming "A Scientific Study". either way, that's enough to BAN someone from a site?

dude...that was so long ago...how can you even hold that against him? he was barely even known to himself, much less anything else. he's tried multiple times to communicate with that site and appologize for his misbehavior...but they have kept ignoreing him.

interesting...well, what Kirlian Photography claims is that it can see the aura/spirit of objects. it's kinda interesting..but as Mokele said, it's not an exact science and is highly speculative.

i see...but still....banning him? that's kind of extreme measures isn't it? i just got done talking to him (we're at school, that's where we are able to get online at) and he told me that he did initially really like this site...alot of members, alot of scientists, a great change to learn new things, and bam, he's banned. if you want to talk to someone who knows him well, and knows how he acts, go talk to the admin at his home site. CD27 is a major moderator there and you'll find out quick, he stands up for what's right when he thinks it's right and he doesn't care who it is he's talking to (which someitme gets him in trouble), but it shows you what kind of person he is. he's not afraid to stand up to people, well, when he actually gets a change to, unlike here, he didn't even have a change to plead his case. he told me that as soon as he logged in thsi morning that it said he had a private message, but then kept him from viewing it and said he was banned. i don't know if he even said he was a "scientist"...and i would figure that scientists are all equal, as they al have to think, and analyze a subject, which CD27 does very well. he's outsmarted me several times, just by sitting back, listening to the question, and then picking it apart. i find him an amazing person, b/c he's able to do a very complex lead of thinking and picking apart in 30 minutes, as it would have taken me all day to do. if you were to read his material you may get a better understanding of his views in life, as he wrote everyting in his theory originally, wiht no outside assistance. if you were to ask him himself, he could explain it better, but from what i've seen, he just seemed to already know all of this stuff. one day he's real stupid, and a few months later, he knows more about the universe than the school books do...which is pretty cool. his work reminds me alot of Einstein's work. you know how Einstein saw everything in a differnt light and was ridiculed because of it? he's had laot of ridiculing in his life, but he stays strong in his beliefs. i comment him for this, and i ask the same from these fellow scientists who seem to place themselves above everyone else, simply becasue they have a degree. i find that kind of discriminate. isn't everyone equal here? if someone didn't like his work, why ban him, post your oppinion, let him know what you think he did wrong and please, tell him what he needs to do to fix it, but don't just turn your back on someone b/c they are younger than you and didn't have to go through all this schooling to know the things they do.

the thread I linked is one that has not been linked on this site before. so i know that, but the one's that pladiese linked are the ones i was referring to. sorry for any confusion. i'm not trying to get "uptight", i'm trying to understand this. either my friend was banned stupidly or there is some sectret reason why he was banned...i would like to know, and so would he.

i would like to request that this thread be locked as my friend is no longer able to return to this site due to someone's dislikeing his work (not really that his work isn't good...just that someone else didn't like it-view it here: http://www.scienceforums.net/forums/showthread.php?p=228876#post228876) i don't think it should be open any longer if my friend is no longer able to defend himself. cd

so, basically, he was banned b/c a few guys didn't like his work? here is the link to his thoery if you care to read: http://www.dkoontz.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=9159&PN=1 also his "Non-science" material is most definately SCIENCE...and has many basics from science added on to them, as well as advanced relativity and qunatum mechanics. i am one of his good friends (not one of his partners on the project he has been working on for months now-so i don't even fully know about it). so, by definition of "ignorant" which was used above so fluently, i can honestly say, BANNING a member b/c someone doesn't like his work or material is completely and utterly IGNORANT. a site this big, i thought better of it. but when you did this, pffftt....forget it. it's not worth it. oh, and he didn't ask ANYONE to design ANYTHING for him. he's the only one (even in his group) who knows the final and MAJOR plans; the device can not work without HIS plans...so there goes your accusation. how can you accuse someone of designing a device for someone else when that person doesn't even know the exact implifications? what my friend DID ask was this:

Hi! i'm Fiend, and by request of a friend of mine, i have come here to ask why he was recently banned. he claims that he was banned for no reason and can't even log in to check his private messages to find out why. um, if you guys can, explain this to me so i can get back to him and i'll get out of your hair as quick as possible. the member i am referring to is CD27.