Yes they are, proof rather than semantic acrobatics follows.
Yes, there is. In this case, the Democrats are re-writing history. [1]. As you can see, they make several "findings" which are easily falsified. These are not questions in the vein of "what happened in 2002 and 2003?" In fact, they're not questions at all. These are accusations by the Senate Democratic Caucus. Specifically, the claim made by Democrats that the intelligence they received (in the October NIE) was dissimilar from intelligence in the community's daily products (the President's Daily and the Senior Executive Intelligence Briefs), is flat out contradicted by the Commission on the Intelligence Capabilities of the United States Regarding Weapons of Mass Destruction's report issued last March. [2]
There is no effort by the Democrats to figure out what went on in the past through investigation. Otherwise there would be mention of what other commissions have found. The Democrats have not, and are consequently either demonstrating the same ignorance they willfully allege they suffered from in October 2002 or more likely the rank dishonesty we've come to know and love about them.
Sure we can, when the Senate Democrats pushing for it blatantly lie in their Myths vs. Reality press releases.
