mississippichem

We introduced them to facebook and they quickly lost their motivation for galactic domination in order to have more time to like status's.

It is not clear where your numbers come from. Why don't you show us equations with variables and some derivations? We can plug in the numbers by ourselves. By the way, the Mayan Caledar ends in 2012 for no specific reason, there is no scientific significance to be found there. My calendar ends tomorrow.

Can Cappy's face be on the shirt?

It's all nonsense. I can detail why if need be. I think the famous quote "not even wrong" applies here. If I know anything about chemistry this is all snake oil.

The structure of snowflake ice crystals has already been explained by molecular dynamics arguments, namely hydrogen bonded networks. Electric field lines are not physical, they are convenient book keeping representations of the field and are often used to supplement drawings of equipotential surfaces.

No, science built western society, along with the computers that we are typing on now. If you really think science is destroying western society then get rid of all your technology and don't ever take an antibiotic again.

I see your logic, it's a good idea but unfortunately incorrect. Any two gasses or any collection of n-gases will always be miscible and will always mix spontaneously. For an ideal gas the enthalpy of mixing is zero and for real gases it is negligible. The mixing is always spontaneous though as the entropic contribution is positive. You can show this by looking at the number of available microstates before and after mixing, as long as there is a boltzmann distribution IIRC, but really it makes sense intuitively and can be deduced by inspection. Excellent question.

Santa just becomes extremely aware of his own momentum, so then he can have position uncertainty over the entire globe and localize at a random chimney. After doing this enough times he has probabilistically visited every house. By the way...could the Easter bunny be santa's hermetian conjugate!?

The ideal gas law gives a situation where a mixture of gases (not a gaseous compound, is this what you meant?) will behave like a single gas. This is really an outcome of the rather drastic assumptions in the ideal gas law though rather than a valid theoretical insight. In a real gas, dipole moments and Van der Waals interactions will play a role and chemically non-identical gases will have different behavior accordingly. There are a number of ways that you can treat this mathematically, all the practical ones involve empirical parameters that are compound specific. The Van der Waals equation is a great demonstrative example but is not useful without the rather "fudgey" Maxwell correction. See the "virial equation of state" to learn how all these gas laws apply under certain scenarios. You'll learn that all the other gas equations are just approximations that are applicable in some limit (like for example low pressure).

Yeah, I tried L' Hopital for several rounds and kept getting indeterminant forms.

Stable bonds don't cause anything to react. In fact it is quite the opposite. The reason chemicals react at all is to form a new chemical species that is more stable than either reactant separately. The best way to look at what's going on is to examine the atomic and molecular orbitals as they are what really makes and breaks bonds. So lets take a simple (perhaps the most simple) example. Two hydrogen atoms both have one electron each, in the ground state this is called a 1s orbital. When those two hydrogens come together their 1s orbitals come together and mix to make a [imath] 1s-1s, \sigma , \ a_{1} \ [/imath]molecular orbital. This molecular orbital is lower in energy than either of the hydrogen 1s atomic orbitals so nature thermodynamically favors the forming of this bond.

That's one oscillation that will never damp for sure. Whoever came up with the second law of thermo evidently was not married.

Any prep involving HF falls off my list of "practical preps". Im not a big fan of molten salts really either.

UV can be bactericidal in the shorter wavelengths IIRC.

If it wasn't paradoxical to disagree with all of you simultaneously I would.

I disagree. No one else did, so I had to.

Depends on what you mean by indestructible...high melting point? Tensile strength? Hardness? All physical properties are pretty specifically defined.

Oh really!? If we were inside a container then shouldn't atmospheric pressure not vary as a function of height? Atmospheric pressure does vary as a function of height. [math] p = p_0 \cdot \left(1 - \frac{L \cdot h}{T_0} \right)^\frac{g \cdot M}{R \cdot L} [/math] as detailed by Wikipedia: Wiki: density of air I'm sure many here would be willing to walk you through the experimental evidence of this or walk you through the derivation of this equation (which is surprisingly simple actually) but only if you are willing to keep an open mind. Like you I don't like wasting my time and energy on people that are just tolling or have already made up their mind. ***What would you accept as evidence of a spherical (right side out) Earth? If there is no evidence you would accept then please kindly bug off as we will just continue to argue back and forth to no avail. I have here offered mathematical and empirical evidence that the earth is in fact a sphere-like body in the vacuum of space. Can you do the same for your assertions? If not, then direct yourself back to the paragraph denoted ***. Please do not call me a dummy, this debate will get plenty heated without resorting to school house tactics. I will not call you names but I will call you on your unsupported assertions and hand-waving.

That chemistry is impossible. If it was possible, the thermodynamics are going the wrong direction, meaning you're doing work or putting energy in the system for no energy benefit. That process would be highly thermodynamically disfavored.

Imagine if someone like Einstein would've had even a few hundred years to continue pondering GR or related topics in physics. I speculate that a lifespan that long might make "geniuses" exponentially more fruitful in the new knowledge they create over their career.

Someone stole your work?

"No. You will!" -my dad

I would hate to die at fifty if I knew I had another 950 left in me. If we live longer, then untimely death means you miss out on more.

You do mean DNA intercalation right? I assume so because the compound you have posted is similar to a class of DNA intercalcting poly-pyridyl Ruthenium(II) complexes I'm familiar with. Well off hand I would say that anything with a quinone, two pyridinyl groups and a phenazine is going to have a lot of [imath] \pi-\pi [/imath] stacking interactions with any purines or pyrimidines. I'm not sure of the structure of "qdppz" (do you have a structure or IUPAC name?) but from how you describe it there should be available hydrogen bond acceptors as well.

How much energy? About 756431 ballon frog rainbows? Your statements are no less ridiculous than that when the units don't balance. Even elementary school teachers require students to write the correct units. Also, you should go into politics as you are a professional question dodger. Not an insult, but a demonstrable fact.