invisiblebrain

it all about survival.... thats true,but it could have chosen a way any other virus does.infect a host cell and multiply itself,defend itself by methods viruses do but it choses a alternative complex way which isnt eaisily explainable ......what abouts its pathogenesis

the virus that causes rabies in dogs,enters our body thru cuts , travels upwards to brains and creates psychological changes that make the dog bite every one(run amok),so that it can propagate itself again dont u think thats 2 smart/coincident?

im a medical guy ,so dont bash me if im wrong,just correct me. if a train is coneected to 2 engines one of which has speed of 40 and other 60,and if both are started simultaneously what will be the speed of the train? will it be 60 above 60 below 60 and above 40 1>it is 60 because 60 overrides 40.(my presumed ans) 2>abvove 60 because some load will be shared by 40 which helps to pull it 3>previosly a 40 engine was attached and now a >40 is attached ,so the speed will be above 40 but below 60 well i thought that 60 was right so where does the energy used up by 60 go?

i and my friend were of same complexion when were childs but i grew up to be darker than my friend although were in same atmos.it genetic ..true.but can it be changed ?if yes then how exactly is it done?im not asking the cosmetic procedure but the scientific logic behind doing the thing

this i think is the most deadly and it is rampant in the tropics.its multiplicative and survival capacities are hardly hidden by the statistics and u know what,it acquiring drug resistance.heard of bacteria acquiring it but a parasite and its fatal if u dont cure,have u ever had malaria?try it ones ull come to know

ringworm is a missinomer.its coused by fungus,but clinically the leisoin looks like a worm burrowing inside ,hence called ring worm

skin color as i know is a genetic trait.so our color is predetermined by our parents. but then can we change it during our life time? how true are the cosmetic gizmos that say its posssible. another thing....children as ive seen(some) are fair in childhood but after turing around 15-20 they express darker complections.how can this be explained?

yeah perfectly true i recently heard about a group that proved that we hate certain colors and certain things of particular consistencies(eg mucus,slimy fluids etc).proabaly this is a bodys mechanism to resist harbouring the parasites that want a free meal....

i wonder sometimes when i think of the viruses..... HIV creates a havoc when it gets into humans CORYZA/RHINO-mutate so quickly that they cannot be conqered by chemicals. what when both these charecters are mixed in one...... will that problem pose a danger to the human populatopn

leprosy is transmitted by aerosol infection , more than close contact.but i still dont think the ratio of encounters with TB/m.leprae matches with the number of AIDS patients having TB. in fact i havent seen in my life a single HIV case which had leprosy,while i have seeen many of them had TB.so i dont think either the prevalence of the survival rate of TB can still amount to the number of cases......there is something more which i believe is immunological........any immunologists please give an opinion as to what specific cells leprae infects.....and that about TB

well a wonderful therotical idea....... but do you think its only the good things that are transfered..... i dont think so......

no not possible at all.......not at least in 100 years(light)........ i dont think its possible to keep on extracting good traits and removing the bad ones,even if u r able to do that for one situation ,millons of others await u. and yet u think if u could develop a race and find the final solution to them..... individuals would vary......... it means the amount of doses would still vary...... now dont propose " create a human and breed it so that all the diffrences are pointed out" u r solution can only conerge it to a narrower beam but not convert it to a ray

well it psycology again........ the inbuilt quest to know about things(physcics) and oneslf(philosophy)......... the idea of going to the root........

simple coincidence............. its always a law of nature,that out of certain number of times..certain number would always preceeed in a particular way.... there are so many people in the world,thinking....so if the thoughts of 2 people in the world are the same ,it wouldnt be a wonder...... i have support for my explanation.... 1>they never occur to you in quick succesions(nether do coincidences) 2>they occur always with 2 (N) people all the time,so if you are among the N people at one period of the time its not a winder

well its the human psycology.............. people from centuries in our country INDIA tried to find out the answer to this question (it was in this time the mughals and the brits attacked us).all of them ended up by giving their own theories or at least by trying to prove that it couldnt be answered. its human pscychology to try to go to the root of a particular problem and when we are sufficiently moving to the roots, we decide that (we feel that)it couldnt have been so far.......... only opinions are right....... the ultimate questions still remain and will remain unanswered. we have evolved from the nature but not according to what any one said but witha propotion of the truth being said by a person... but the GOD(DOG) theorists, better check u r brains,its a feeling, (the same feeling of excess pain when a robber strikes u and less of it when u r grandson does),be not be led by a feeling,question everything....... its human psycology....BUDDHA said there was no god,but people said he was the god....

well this time to harp on leprosy and tb both in leprosy and tuberculosis ,its the cell mediated immunity and not the humoral immunity that works but in AIDS where cell mediated immunity is depresssed , tuberculosis is more common than leprosy...... what does that reallly mean......

viruses can utilize their genetic matierial to the max extent by transcripting in a sequence in one fashion and then by doing the same thing by shifting the reading frame to the next position and sysnthesize a new peptide...... this seems too intelligent but would it be really posssible that the resulting protien could make sesnse and could really be utilizred for the viruses purpose of continuing its life........ what do ye think....

well this is a view from langhmans...... the immunology of pregnant lady is suppressed and so the rejection doesnt occur...... any contras...

i have my own theory..... i think there was a step in the evolution when something similar to viruses (call them protoviruses)came to existence,but they had the metabolic enzyme machinery.........,they survived and further evolution gave bacteria.............and one day the bacteria gave rise to viruses ......these viruses which had some unique advantage over protoviruses killed them and survived back.....huh seems much related to the 2nd option but still would explain its closeness to 1st one