Pinch Paxton

Well I hate the crappy CG versions! Especially the Purple/blue jabba. They should dump the CG, or improve it. Pincho.

The Matrix was OK! Reloaded is my favourite film of all time! Haven't seen Revolutions. Pincho.

Looks good!

You have to make a very small picture for this site, with some jpg compression. My avatar just about passed the test. I had to compress it a bit before it would work. Pincho.

Well, Ok that makes sense, but I'm sure that something can be predicted from my theory that couldn't be predicted without it. So I'll have to think of something that I can predict, that the normal rules of light can't. Pincho.

Daisy, Daisy give me your answer do, I'm half crazy waiting for what you can do. It won't be a stylish jpg If you can't afford Photoshop But you'll look sweet on the site With an avatar made for you!

But the big bang theory is based on perceivable after effects, and my theory is also based on the perceivable after effect of light being in two places at once, the wave made by individual photons, the observer theory of light, light reaching us from billions of light years away, atoms having instant changes, and other things. If your little green men left their pick axes behind, and their wheelbarrows, then you would at least have some evidence. Pincho.

Three pages, and still no Avatar, what's going on here? Do you like my Avatar, it's from a game I'm making about Jack The Ripper! Pincho.

You could be right. Einstein had a denser brain than most people, so maybe our density has increased over time, which would keep the shape of the skull pretty much the same. Lol! Puts a new meaning on the saying "Are you dense or what!" Pincho.

I am talking about our nearest ancestors. Erm not Neanderthal man, the other one which I can't remember the name of...Homo Erectus, or whatever he was called. Anyhow the one with the same skull as ours. Pincho.

Well maybe the time wave theory obeys the C rule but when it reaches its destination it bounces back. This causes time to travel backwards again resulting in no time loss. It would obey the C rule in both directions! Pincho.

I like to think of time as the wave, and light as the photon particle that rides on the wave. These atoms could be causing ripples in the time wave, and the wave travels towards, and away from both of them at the same time. This results in no time loss at all between the spooky action at a distance.

Yeah it makes more sense that way. It is still quite a new theory, and it still works with the picture that I found. So that's fine. As for the sand coming back over time, well water certainly would, and sand is like solid water, so that is right. Pincho.

That sounds interesting. It has some relevance, I shall look for it. Pincho.

Presuming that light travels as a wave then it can be bent off course. It's just that the wave is travelling the wrong way, and backwards through time. You get the same end result as travelling in the right direction, and forwards in time. There would be no observable difference, apart from the anomalies that are already known. Pincho.

Yeah I agree with the pushing sand method. That picture has apparatus higher than the building, suggesting that the sand was piled up to begin with. I think that the theory of piling sand is right. Still though, it requires pushing the blocks up an incline. Not a bad idea though. Pincho.

When you drop a stone into water, you start a wave pattern. The stone would be the observer, the wave pattern would be the light. The only difference being that the wave pattern goes towards the stone, instead of away from it. Hence, back in time. Pincho.

Usually yes! But a picture of a man can represent life on earth, but it can also represent a toilet. lol!

Well I have suggested that light takes no time to reach Earth because it travels backwards in time. I have suggested that there is no speed of light, and that the speed is wrong. So I have already answered that question. Current theory without my example has no explenation that I know of that would answer your question. Pincho.

Yeah it is an interesting picture because it shows something very much like my idea of how they moved the sand away. The slippery snake would represent the slipping sand down a trench system. There appears to be a small building at the beginning, and there appear to be high wooden supports to lift the wooden trench into the air. the first trench appears to have someone sending sand to the top. And at the ends of the trenches, the sand appears to be falling out onto the floor. I could easily imagine this as a secret formula for the pyramids using the idea that I have mentioned. I only just found this picture, and it took me by surprise. Sorry to sound too fenatical about my idea. I have a very open mind, so feel free to dissasemble my theory. Pincho.

Yeah but did the planet Earth have any life at all when the light left these stars to reach us today.

Just as a matter of interest, could this picture be showing how they moved the sand away from th pyramid after they built it? Pincho.

You have to turn the light way down so that just 1 photon is emmited at a time, but I'm not sure how they do that part. You need photographic paper at the back of the shoe box to record the event. Apparently this can be done in nearly all colleges around the world. Pincho.

If you feel that I am misunderstanding it in my presentation to you, then you are reading almost the same presentation that I have read myself, and you too are reading the same explenation that I have read. Do you follow that? For example: I read a theory about a box divided in two, and I came to the conclusion that light travels to an observer. The posts on here all suggest that light travels to an observer, so a lot of people think the same way as me. You have read my re-wording of this book, but my wording is good enough to explain the theory to you. Now having read my explenation, you think that I have misunderstood it, but to think that I have misunderstood it means that you have got the same answer from my wording, as I got from the book. So a lot of people on this forum seem to have misunderstood the book the same as me. Pincho.

Ok, but I have always believed that the phenomenon was widely known. There are many pages on this forum about it. Pincho.