Pinch Paxton

I have spent ages trying to beat the Asteroids score, and now I find that the trophys have vanished. What happened? Pincho.

Yeah..Did we land on the moon? LOL! And why does the flag wave around? Err but otherwise I don't know. Pincho.

Grin + X ? = Grinch?

It's not fixed.....I'm The Grinch!!! Actually it's Ginch, but close enough!!! Pincho.

Yeah sure....Read this. http://www.dancesafe.org/documents/druginfo/cocaine.php

It used to work, but they changed the ingredients of Coke. It used to contain cocaine. Pincho.

The emotions of the Human species are not balanced. Distress should be an evolutionary advantage for a species to survive. A partner gets killed, you blow up, and kill the predator. But humans have another option which is suicide. This is probably because society doesn't view revenge as a decent option. This kind of society probably make emotion more confusing than they need to be, because we have laws that prevent us from using them how they are supposed to be used. Anyhow, because of my previous statement, it would be psychological stress that causes us to cry, as part of the human nature to survive. Pincho.

This guy sure knows his science when it comes to cooling his PC! Pincho. http://www.avforums.com/frame.html?http://www.avforums.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=56924 Fixed URL - Sayo

Drinking a hot drink cools you down.

A Genius to me is someone who creates a solution to problem before the problem was even known. Where a population of thousands have accepted something as fact, the genius knows already that the facts are wrong. Pincho.

Light doesn't just go. It has been proved that it travels to a place that is to be observed. Read Scrodingers Kittens. Or find the Two Slit Experiment on Google search.

You want light to change states to conform to science? Science is not part of the equation. Light doesn't need to change from a particle to a wave or anything like that. That's the problem.. science becomes a part of something, like it is unbreakable. The wave is the signal, the light is always a photon, never a wave. The interference pattern is the light interfering with the signal wave. The signal wave travels faster than light. Humans have an observable speed limit which is C, but it is not really time. Time is just our word for advancing forward, and we can only advance our equipment forward to the speed of C. We can only measure C, and then we need a new type of measurement.

It's enough to show that the light hit a spot on photographic paper that was defined during the flight of the light particle. It made a decision whether to go through the top slit, or the bottom slit, or both. It's like driving a car on the road home, and you are hungry. You can see two Cafe ahead of you, one on the right side of the road, and one on the left. You have never been here before, but you want to visit the cafe that has the best food. Do you turn left or right? The light seems to know in advance which slit it is going to go through. It must have recieved a message. The message would have to travel faster than light to give the information to the photon. Pincho.

I am talking about The Two slit theory, where light travels to a predetermined location.

...so since we're talking purely mathematical manipulation, time ought to be destroyed by travelling exactly at c, since that would create a divide by zero error in the space time continuum! rofl. *************************************************** Maths is used for E = MC2 1) No. If you really need to be explained why light is constant for all reference frames, refrain from claiming to know relativity well. *************************************************** My answer was not to do with relativity. It was to do with Scrodinger's Kittens. 2) Neutrinos can exist as discrete particles. They have their own mass, and even oscillate between different types of themselves. *************************************************** Nutrinos do not necessarily have mass. That was a scientific guess. It was based on them changing states. But they would change states if they travelled faster than light, and then they would have no mass. ..and on the third point; not only do neutrinos not come from the future since they do not travel faster than c, but they interact so weakly with matter there's no biological mechanism that could possibly detect a considerable amount of them, much less interpret them into something usefull, and such gathering and decoding would require some sort of supernatural explanation, which I no doubt expect you to soon advocate. ************************************************** I can tell by your answers that you are a follower of science, but not an actual theorist yourself. You never make any deductions, you just spout out actual known science like a dictionary. Why don't you actually think about what you are saying? Just think about nutrinos by yourself, instead of telling me the scientific guess. Why don't you think that anything can travel faster than light if light seems to have a predefined path. You know, you really have to make a contribution to science rather than just be part of it. Pincho.

Relativity is a concept that shows that things could be travelling faster than light. It was not designed to do this, but it does show this anyway. If you travel faster than light, time moves backwards. This would cause the illusion that light has not accelerated. C + 5 = C + 5 + time - 5 = C See, light is still a constant. Because of two reasons. 1/ Light travels to an observer. This requires another message before the light gets there. That would require the other message to travel faster than light. 2/ Particles like nutrinos are spaced apart. There needs to be a wave, not a particle to produce continuous movement. They cannot move on their own momentum, this is a falacy. But if you are talking about psychic prediction of a future event, you would have to be somehow connected to the future. I am thinking that nutrinos, or similar are the connection, plus they travel through us, and through our brain. Perhaps we could pick up the signal. Pincho.

Of course it's possible to go past the speed of light. Why is it considered impossible? I never found that part out, but it better not have to do with light being the creation of images because that would be lame.

No, I haven't heard of it.

Yes that is the idea. Maybe you could even pick up a similar discharge from the brain impulses. There must be a few things that pass through us faster than light, and whatever they are, have come from the future. I don't know if we have the ability to use them in any way, but they would pass through us, and then pass into the computer, or into the ball bearings. It's possible that they might have something to do with gravity, so moving things has a slight probibility. If we could just influence a small fraction of an event, a computer can run millions of events a second, so you could amplify any tiny change in an event. That's about as far as I can go with this psychic brain subject.

You have the same problem with the ball bearings. They have to follow the rules of gravity etc. The computer has to use the Timer() to get its random numbers from. If you wanted to affect the computer choices you would have to slow down, or speed up the clock, then you would have to witness the results of this on the screen so that you could decide if you were improving your chances of getting a number right, or moving the choice away from the number 3 in your example. Pincho.

. They can if you can get white noise into your computer, and use this as the seed. That's not very scientific. You have performed no tests at all, unlike me. I have performed 3 years of tests. But you make a quote that is far more extreme than anything that I have said so far. Not only is it extreme, but it agrees with me in a roundabout sort of way. So in a few decades it will be possible? This means that it is possible now surely. Pincho

Three runs. I do three lines of lotto tickets each week. Say for example... 01,02,03,04,05,06 07,08,09,10,11,12 13,14,15,16,17,18 My computer picked 5 numbers from my third line. 13,14,15,16,17,19 It was 1 number over on the sixth number. It does other strange things besides just picking your numbers. If you think of a number for it to go into, it goes in the opposite direction. Probably has to do with the subconcious. My program is like a clock face, so if you think about number 3, it goes into number 9. I have reasons not to say, but I make computer games, so it was using a sort of pinball physics. If you want a direct link to the computer then remember that the Timer() is connected to the clock pulses which occur every 60th of a second. You need to mentally connect to those pulses to interfere with the rnd() seed. Pincho.

I've already told you how I made the program. I made a computer program that drops millions of ball bearings into 49 buckets. You make a point without reading my posts, that is not a good sign. My computer picked 5 of my numbers, and 5 of my friends numbers, it was based on an experiment that was devised to pick buckets depending on what you are thinking about. Although all of this could be coincidence, it takes a lot of ignorance to ignore it altogether. Anyhow my computer program is on the net, and has been on there for about a year now, so you can try it out if you like. It's free.

My computer program is not a random number generator, its the ballbearing test placed inside a computer. It can drop millions of ballbearings, and has 49 buckets instead of 2. So you see it is based of psychic tests. If you can manipulate the simulated ball bearings into the winning lotto number buckets then you can predict the future. See how I have linked Telekenisis, and Psychic phenomenon together? Like I said, the program picked 5 of my numbers. I connected to the concious part of the brain, instead of the psychic. I have been trying to fix this. Pincho.

Well what I was doing was linking the brain, to nutrinos or other connections with the outside world in both cases, but we can ignore my perception if you like, and stick with the standard definitions. The thing is that if you are going to move something, you need a link between you and the thing, and if you are going to predict something then you need a link between you and a future event. Part of my argument was that the thing connecting us is like a pond of water, and in both cases, it is ripples in the same pond that connect the two things together, but the ripples are either used as receivers, or transmitters. Anyhow, you can use the two things like a telephone, with an ear piece, and the microphone. A telephone is considered as a single object, but Ok I shall stick with the two seperate objects. Pincho.