Pinch Paxton

Male carries rare, dormant disease ........................... Female carries matching gene causing mutated childbirth ........................... Dormant Male breeds with none gene carrying female, male child carries dormant gene. Dormant female breeds with none gene carrying male, female child carries dormant gene. ........................... Population growth increases risk of carrying child mutation, when a couple both carrying genes mate. ........................... 16 million years later, whole population carry mutant genes. ........................... Breeding now causes mutation each time. ........................... Mutated T-Rex has smaller arms. Cannot fall, else starves. ........................... T-Rex moves into water, where he cannot fall over. ........................... A large breed of Crocs already live in water, their gene pool is also starting to weaken. T-rex mates with female T-rex in water. mutated Genes are passed into water. Croc mates with female croc in water, some mutated genes are passed into water. T-rex drinks water containing croc mutated genes. Croc digests water containing mutated T-rex genes. Croc eggs contain a mutation, with some elements of T-rex. T-rex eggs contain a mutation with some elements of croc. Adventually the two mutations are able to breed, and produce a smaller croc with a new gene pool which is safe. New small Crocs continue to survive, but T-rex, and larger croc become extinct. Is that simple enough?

You call that asteroid list logic because it contains no science at all. I can't strip the science away from a gene theory, it is more complex. I am writing a computer program at the moment to see what would happen if 2 people in 100000 had faulty genes. Then pass the genes on to their children as dormant. I am interested to find out what happens when the population reaches 20000000. Will the gene pool start to become higher risk, or lower? Pincho.

And you tell me to get my facts right, but Lions, and Tigers can breed naturally without any help from mankind. It's just that they live in different countries. Pincho.

Also female hormones are combining with male hormones in our drinking water. Males are becoming more female. This is the same as T-rex drinking from the croc water, and the crocs also drinking the same water.

I think I have presented as much evidence as the crator, and the dust cloud, and the Ice Age. Crator = Swamp full of crocs, and T-rex. Dust cloud = Gene cloud in water. Ice Age = Dormant Gene pool.

I've seen Ligers already, they are easy to breed. So are some other cross breeding animals. Zebras and horses are easy. T-rex, and crocs are very similar. Actually I think that lizards are easier than mammals to cross breed.

Like a giant meteor you mean? Or a giant crator? Then I would have a great theory huh?

Mankind isn't at the end of its gene pool though. Imagine two species like T-Rex, and crocodiles both coming to the end of their gene pools. T-rex reduces in size and becomes weaker, his forearms shrink, and if he falls he has a problem getting up again. So T-rex moves into water, where he feels more stable. Crocs are in the water, maybe larger than normal crocs of today. T-rex mates, and the water contains T-rex genes. Crocs mate, and the water contains croc genes. Somehow this swamp of mixed genes contaminates both species, and the two become intertwined after a few years. That's why all of the T-rex that we find have these small forearms, we are finding the more recent mutated T-rex, rather than an older perfect version, which may have looked very different. We might even confuse older T-rex with a different species of dinosaur. This is still theoretical. Pincho.

Mutations would allow some cross breeding, because a large number of mutations would allow for a large number of possibilities, and results.

No I meant that they breed with existing crocodiles because T-rex became smaller and more awkward. This then increased the croc gene pool. I knew already that crocs existed then. I beleive that they were a bit larger, but I may be wrong on that. Do I really have to check the sizes of them as well?

Hypothetically, I was thinking that the child defects from the parents carrying the bad genes cause a mutation that was allowed to continue the species. The mutation from T-rex could have bread with, and led to crocodiles, and alligators, very quickly compared to normal evolution. I expect this transition from T-rex to crocodile to actuall improve the crocodile gene pool, and continue the species for many more years. But again, I expect someone to use bad manners. Pincho.

So science provided the evidence that a meteor killed the dinosaurs? Actually my evidence in this case is quite simple. All you have to do is calculate the number of dinosaurs that reach maturity and breed from a single set of parents. Then you need to calculate how many of these would pass on an heriditary gene that is dormant until it is passed on to a female carrying another heriditary gene that combines with the male's gene. These two genes together causing child defect. Then it would be possible to calculate if there would be a substantial dormant period, allowing both male, and female to breed dormancy to extinction. I don't need to prove any of this, it's all hypothetical. I believe that the thread was meant to be hypothetical in its nature anyway. What really killed the dinosaurs? sounds hypothetical to me. I'm fed up of the bad attitude that is generated on this site from any sort of comment that is not already known about. Pincho.

Also you say hundred, and hundreds of species, but I am relating my idea to a time that genes become too similar to continue a species. This time period would be a mathematical formula that would extinguish many species who had lived for a similar number of generations.

Last week it was science that said it was a meteor. I actually already had my gene idea. I was ahead of science at that point, because my idea has not yet been totally prooved wrong, only by you, and I would expect that on here anyway.

Look I suppose you are saying that my interpretation is wrong, but you are too argumentative to notice that the conclusion is the same whatever meaning you decide to take. Dinosaurs could have had a recessive gene, a dominant gene to extinction, a preference for dark skin, all the same result. Maybe you should try adding to my posts rather that immediately debunking them. Pincho.

Ok read this........ http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/2284783.stm

Pardon? are you disagreeing with the blonde hair thing?

Snooker physics? If an object is at rest, and an energy transferance take place, then the object at rest takes over the momentum in the opposite direction to the point of impact. If an atom were at rest, and a wave passed energy to the atom, then the atom would move away from the point at which the wave passed the energy to it. This would be a fluctuating energy. When two atoms collide in opposite directions as a result of this energy they stand still, but energy is still being exerted to them from the wave. The wave is cancelled out at the point between the two atoms. Eventually you will get a group of atoms, a planet, but the atoms can't all be colliding directly, so there is some spin, they are spinning. The wave is cancelled out throughout the radius of the planet. This is a flatline wave. All objects are determined to reach a flatline wave, all objects are attracted towards a planet, or any other flatline wave in that area. Like someone putting their finger on a guitar string. Is that any clearer? Pincho.

Maybe their gene pool became heriditarally weaker over 16 million years? Humans are some day going to loose their blonde hair because brown hair is more dominant. Maybe this is like a countdown to extinction in a long run of time. First we loose blonde hair, then what? What happens when you are a huge population of similar genes? Could this have caused the extinction of the dinosaurs? Pincho.

Hmm, maybe you can't follow words just maths. I didn't say that the mathematical formulas didn't exist, I said that I haven't seen any, so I don't know how to write them. This is pseudoscience I suppose to people that can't understand it. To others, it is the start of a career proving it. Not me though, because I just posted it so that the right people could see it. This is the end of my posts on this subject, I have found too much immaturity to bother with this site anymore. Pincho.

I've never seen any mathematical formulas for any scientific theory, so I have nothing to base my theory on. But I have lived my whole life this way, and I still know that magnets exist. Show me the mathematical formula for magnetism, and I shall see if I can calculate my formula. I also need the mathematic formula for gravity, and a formula for wave/energy transferance. Oh yeah I have seen a formula..E=mc2, but I believe that it was innacurate, slightly higher than it should be. Pincho.

This is funny! Do you guys go to the beach? Because I can imagine you all waiting for the mathematical formula of water before you would go there.

Maybe if I post a circular example you will understand better, but really you should imagine a 3D example. Pincho.

Why am I going round in circles with this? It's obvious how my theory works surely. It based on sand on a beach, how simple can I make it. It's based on waves pushing matter. You could imagine a vibrating guitar string, it moves objects away from the vibration because they have no choice but to continue outwards to a stationary area, otherwise they are in a state of energy. Here's my link again. http://www.scienceforums.net/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=3164

I thought you were taking the 'P'. I am starting to have my own doubts anyway. Between planets there should be a rise of forces, and I'm not sure that there actually is. It might be very small between the planets in our solar system, but I'm sure that we would notice it anyway. Pincho.