Pinch Paxton

This shows antigravity over long distances. This either makes or breaks my theory. Pincho.

Actually I have thought of something that is different about my universe. Between planets that are long distances apart, better still, between galaxies, there would be anti-gravity. This would be a force that pushes things away from an invisible field. A spaceship trying to approach this empty space, would not be able to get near it. This is because the waves that I have mentioned are not held firmly by atoms, so they are allowed to vibrate wildly. So I believe that I have predicted something from my theory. Pincho.

Well you can put it anywhere you like. It was just my idea as the basis for a chat. The chat didn't go the way I expected.

My theory has not been broken yet. It still conforms to all previously known laws. It also helps to identify unknown laws like gravity, spooky science, magnetism, photon interference, bending light, glass, water, photon duality, the list goes on.

Yeah but the experiments have already been done before, they were just explained with a different aproach to science. It's like I am the greatest musician of all time, but every song has been made already. I had better words for the records, but it's too late. Pincho.

I've re-read the two slot experiment. It still produces my wave exactly how I said. It is worded differently of course, because it takes a different approach to the answer. It interferes with itself, is used, instead of, it interferes with my theoretical liquid wave. I don't see what is wrong with my theory. It produces all the results that you read about. It conforms to all known science, and it gets rid of the nonesense, like spooky science. My wave explains spooky events with the wave travelling faster than time. All I can do now is sit back and wait for science to prove me right. It may not be long. Then you can remember that I told you about it before. No one could follow me. That doesn't make me cleaver, it makes me a heretic. Pincho.

Well I edited it out. It's just a consequence of the wave. I don't feel that I have to explain all of the already known facts just to get back to my theory. Soon I'll have to prove that the world is round. I feel like I am having to explain way to many know details to keep this running. Some things aren't visible, they have consequences, but are not easily detected. You can see iron filings from magnetism forming a pattern, that is my liquid in action. That's the best I can tell you. Pincho.

Well that depends on whether you decide to believe in Dark Matter, Strings. I suppose that fish don't really notice that they are in water. Pincho.

I've already mentioned Scrodingers Kittens. That is based on the two slot experiment. That actually helps my theory with the observed effect of light travelling to the observer. It would need to know which direction to travel ahead of time. That's part of my wave theory. I mentioned it already.

What's the difference?

Why is my interpretation poor? That is the actual test that is performed to show light as a wave, and a particle. You use a piece of photosensitive paper, and fire a photon through a hole to hit the paper. The photons will produce a pattern like a wave over time. How is that different to my example of a surfer hitting a wall, and a photon hitting photosensitive paper? My example is the exact test performed. Pincho.

?

Scrodingers Kitten is a Popscience book based on real experiments. The experiments are taken from universities from all over the world. The experiments show how light can be both a particle, and a wave. If a surfer hit a wall, and left a mark, he would leave the mark at the height of the wave. If he repeatedly hit the wall, he would leave marks at different heights. That is what light does when it hits photosensitive paper. Shut up about light travelling faster than itself. Light speed as registered by man is not accurate. Therefore I can say that light travels faster than Lightspeed, because lightspeed is a number that is innacurate. For example, can sound be heard inside Concord? Is that sound travelling faster than the speed of sound relative to someone on the ground? Same thing. Pincho.

It is based on science, but I thought that everyone on here was up to date with all of that, so I didn't bother explaining the experimental results based on tests in universities. I have explained it now. Here...... http://www.scienceforums.net/forums/showthread.php?s=&postid=41289#post41289

@Mooeypoo But I have several times, but you haven't seemed to follow what I am talking about. Light can be a wave, and a particle right? You know that? How can this be explained? It can be explained by light travelling on a wave right? Light would then be a particle travelling on a wave. If light is a particle travelling on a wave, what about atoms. They are particles. How do they float though space? If you put sand on a guitar string it vibrates the sand to an area that is not vibrating, that is atoms travelling on strings. In the sea, sand is pushed along onto the beach, that is atoms travelling on a wave. Light travels to an observer as you should know. How does the observer send a signal to the photon? You need a material between the photon, and the observer that cannot be seen. What is this material? It's a material that creates the wave pattern of photons. If it creates a wave pattern from a single photon then it is a wave itself. So an observer produces a wave that affects a photon. How can this wave reach the photon before the photon has reached its destination. It has to travel faster than the photon to get there in time. So now we have a wave that travels faster than light. So why can't the photon travel faster than light on the wave of the string. We it can! Scrodingers Kittens shows how a light particle can be in two places at once. This can only happen if the wave from the observer reaches the same photon from two different directions. Because the wave can travel faster than light, it travels backwards in time. It reaches the light from both directions of an observers directional path. Now the photon has two paths to take. It has to travel faster than time to reach both goals. So light speed is not accurate. I have explained this earlier. Now we have a wave focusing light. But the wave has to fill the entire universe to function properly with light. Its a wave with a high peak if it is capable of pushing photons at extreme high speeds, so maybe it can push matter. How do I find out if it interacts with matter. Well we start with magnetism. Magnets cause a wave visible from iron filings. This wave can push magnets together. They are matter. They must be using the same medium as light because that medium has to be everywhere to work with light. So now the wave can push matter. Therefore it can vibrate in a way to push atoms together. Therefore it produces gravity. That's all the typing I want to do. If you don't understand, the I have to refer you back to Scrodingers Kittens. Pincho.

No scrodingers Kittens is an entire book. I think that my theory is one of those things that only a few people can understand. The ones that already know about strings, Scrodinger's Kittens, fractals, light, time, constant velocity, dark matter, and I can't go through every detail. I was hoping for other people to join in, and fill in some of the gaps, but maybe I am on the wrong site.

But it's an entire book. I told you about Scrodinger's Kittens, surely I can't quote an entire book in a thread.

You are making out that I am guessing. But there are is a lot of real science involved in my theory. Maybe you are not up to scratch with the details of light?

Hmm you seem to be low on intelligence..I don't expect you to understand, I expect you to get annoyed with your inability to cope with science laying you out with impossibilities. My material is based on science, but a lot of science has proven things that are false. If I use those things then I can only end up with another of your none sensical factors, like light not travelling any faster when you approach it. You can stick with your innacuracies if you like, but I am sticking with my truth. Pincho.

Maybe science can only proove things that are untrue? Maybe there are so many false factors in science that you will never get to the truth? Then you are stuck in your own black hole. Pincho.

My theory started to evolve when I read Scrodinger's Kittens. That might be a good place for you to start. It's the best popular science book ever. Then I started to wonder how light can produce those odd results, and be in two places at once, and produce both a wave, and a particle. The I started thinking about strings, and I started bypassing anything that didn't make physical sense. So I made sense of everything, and i got rid of the flat universe, and I got rid of the infinate universe, and I disposed of the constant speed of light. Now I was left with my theory. It's more to do with selective science, which is a good idea really. Lets not have these spooky results. Pincho.

I am saying that we are surrounded by waves that are pushing us down to the ground, like a surrounding sea. Waves, Vibrations, radiation, whatever you want to call them. They are also like strings, and the atoms are the beads, and light is a bead that creates its own wave behind itself. A magnet creates its own wave too, but the wave is displaced by some distance away from the magnet. Glass is a bead that has been pushed off the string so that light can travel between its atoms. I'm not sure what else I can say. This isn't on topic anyway. Pincho.

Do you understand how water pushes sand and surfers onto the beach?

It works with magnets too...Very nicely.

I have posted my example of how I would portray gravity. Here's a link. http://www.scienceforums.net/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=3164 It's very probably right, but I can't prove it.